ImageImageImage

More Rumors

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,291
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: More Rumors 

Post#61 » by shrink » Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:04 pm

DmoneyH3 wrote:Who would you guys give up for Rudy?
Unlike most Portland fans, I too think he is a tad overrated, but has the potential to become a great play-maker.
We have no need for Flynn as we have our own young PG in Bayless.
As a Blazer fan, the only assets I value on your team are AJ and your 1st round pick. I like Love, but he can't play the 5 and Al can, which enables us to keep Aldridge.


So you think Rudy's a tad over-rated, but the only assets you value here are Al Jefferson and the 1st?!?

I wonder what other POR fans want, that don't think Rudy's over-rated?!

Hilarity.
User avatar
DmoneyH3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 757
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 08, 2007
     

Re: More Rumors 

Post#62 » by DmoneyH3 » Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:06 pm

You didn't comprehend what I wrote. I said the only assets I value are your 1st and AL (dont need Flynn or Love, so point in valuing them). Never did I say it would take either one to get Rudy, just saying in a nut shell, we are not good trading partners.
Image
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,291
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: More Rumors 

Post#63 » by shrink » Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:09 pm

Maybe I didn't comprehend that
Who would you guys give up for Rudy?"

actually meant
in a nut shell, we're not good trading partners."

I should have realized you wanted to trade Rudy for assets you don't value.

I'll try to work on my reading comprehension.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves