t. owens

bangostalker · Post #1 » by **bangostalker** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:35 am

Sorry if this is off topic...I am at sundance watching the vikes game at a place called harry ols...aaron rodgers was here with t.o...a. rogers is a very cool guy, but the interesting thing is that he is here with t.o. and t.o is on the mic mc'ing the game...t.o. just said "you didn't hear it feom me, but here is my quarterback next year!"

Don't shoot the messenger!

Steve nash is here as well, and very cool.

chuckleslove · Post #2 » by **chuckleslove** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:38 am

I'm sure T.O. would love to play with a real QB instead of the crap he played with last year.

I doubt TT wants anything to do with T.O.

Most realistic scenario there is that T.O. is just running his mouth like normal.

Scoops · Post #3 » by **Scoops** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:39 am

With the way Driver played this year we'd set the record for drops.

PkrsBcksGphsMqt · Post #4 » by **PkrsBcksGphsMqt** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:16 am

Scoops wrote:With the way Driver played this year we'd set the record for drops.

Yeah no kidding, we might as well go get Braylon Edwards too.

Mags FTW · Post #5 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:17 am

A little google search and they are both at this event, but I'm sure T.O. was just joking. He's still on BUF's roster.

Post #6 » by **Wade-A-Holic** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:34 am

TO will make a good towel boy for Jermichael Finley.

MilBucksBackOnTop06 · Post #7 » by **MilBucksBackOnTop06** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:09 am

Terrell Owens would be an excellent addition and I have said this many times before this year and have been laughed out of the room...
But I have always felt the Packers have always needed a big game player at WR and a true #2 and #3 receiver behind their #1 on a one or two year deal if they ever got close to contention.
Terrelll keeps himself in great shape, is a great competitor and he plays to win and then put on a show.
He gives us options and is a man that teams will have to plan for.
With an emerging running game in Ryan Grant and A. Rodgers and "All World" TE Jermichael Finley, he would give McCarthy and teams another weapon they would have to cover and perhaps leave Rodgers unaccounted for on short yardage situations. The Packers would be unstoppable.
T.O would be no different then other 'personalities' we have had before added one of the youngest teams and promising in the NFL.
Terrell can be more then a decoy in the red-zone offense. And he would be coming to a team that actually was the victim of his breakout game in the NFC title game years ago when the madness that is T.O began.
Like a John Jefferson, Andre Rison and the guy we got from Seattle named Robinson...I say bring him in. If I played football I would love T.O as a teammate. I am one who does not find his antics a big distraction. I can see his passion...and drive and instead of knocking him I would try to match it on some level to win.
GM Thompson wouldn't get Moss for Favre, perhaps you will get T.O. for Rodgers along with Finley and Jennings you can look out!
And then maybe the Milwaukee Bucks can sign Owens to a NBA 10 day contract as well? :wink:

crkone · Post #8 » by **crkone** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:18 am

I'd play him at CB and safety over Bush.

chuckleslove · Post #9 » by **chuckleslove** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:20 am

MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:Terrell Owens would be an excellent addition and I have said this many times before this year and have been laughed out of the room...
But I have always felt the Packers have always needed a big game player at WR and a true #2 and #3 receiver behind their #1 on a one or two year deal if they ever got close to contention.
Terrelll keeps himself in great shape, is a great competitor and he plays to win and then put on a show.
He gives us options and is a man that teams will have to plan for.
With an emerging running game in Ryan Grant and A. Rodgers and "All World" TE Jermichael Finley, he would give McCarthy and teams another weapon they would have to cover and perhaps leave Rodgers unaccounted for on short yardage situations. The Packers would be unstoppable.
T.O would be no different then other 'personalities' we have had before added one of the youngest teams and promising in the NFL.
Terrell can be more then a decoy in the red-zone offense. And he would be coming to a team that actually was the victim of his breakout game in the NFC title game years ago when the madness that is T.O began.
Like a John Jefferson, Andre Rison and the guy we got from Seattle named Robinson...I say bring him in. If I played football I would love T.O as a teammate. I am one who does not find his antics a big distraction. I can see his passion...and drive and instead of knocking him I would try to match it on some level to win.
GM Thompson wouldn't get Moss for Favre, perhaps you will get T.O. for Rodgers along with Finley and Jennings you can look out!
And then maybe the Milwaukee Bucks can sign Owens to a NBA 10 day contract as well?

Do you actually know sports or do you just spout stuff on here just to hear yourself talk? Did you go to the Sparky school of spouting crap just to start controversy? You really can't believe everything you post, I just refuse to accept that.

MilBucksBackOnTop06 · Post #10 » by **MilBucksBackOnTop06** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:21 am

crkone wrote:I'd play him at CB and safety over Bush.

You know what...Bush can be a player. I am pulling for the kid to learn from Woodson and become a better player.
I would assign Woodson to him and challenge Charles to help this young man out. I like his value and play on special teams.
The Packers must have liked something in him or they would not have drafted him. I don't see what the big deal is on Jarrett Bush...really

jakecronus8 · Post #11 » by **jakecronus8** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:28 am

This is obviously BS but I would love it.

I know to is past his prime but he is still a good receiver and one of my all time favorite players. Out team is so vanilla right now so bringing in someone with some attitude and brashness could be good.

xTitan · Post #12 » by **xTitan** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:31 am

jakecronus8 wrote:This is obviously BS but I would love it.

I know to is past his prime but he is still a good receiver and one of my all time favorite players. Out team is so vanilla right now so bringing in someone with some attitude and brashness could be good.

On the defensive side is where they need some animals who kill QB's

Mags FTW · Post #13 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:37 am

jakecronus8 wrote:This is obviously BS but I would love it.

I know to is past his prime but he is still a good receiver and one of my all time favorite players. Out team is so vanilla right now so bringing in someone with some attitude and brashness could be good.

Jermichael Finley is that guy. It started with his Lions twitter and he put everyone on notice after the Arizona loss.

"This is like the appetizer," he said. "The full course meal is coming pretty soon."

Max Green · Post #14 » by **Max Green** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:12 am

T.O. will end up either in Baltimore, New England or Minnesota.

xTitan · Post #15 » by **xTitan** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:15 am

MVP4Champ wrote:T.O. will end up either in Baltimore, New England or Minnesota.

He has already burned the Baltimore bridge, Minnesota doesn't need him, after Moss's late season quitting I doubt they take a chance......Chicago is desperate, he just might go there.

Mags FTW · Post #16 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:22 am

http://twitter.com/ogwilson/statuses/8157208069

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/style/ ... stage.html

Late into the night we spied women throwing themselves at Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers and the Buffalo Bills wide receiver Terrell Owens, whom we saw at the Fred Segal Fun style lounge earlier in the day. Speaking of throwing, it’s too bad Rodgers’s throwing arm didn’t land him in the N.F.C. Championship game, which is being screened at Harry O’s this afternoon; at least the football player is being a good sport and hosting the party.

Best buds.

jakecronus8 · Post #17 » by **jakecronus8** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:33 am

PkrsBcksGphsMqt · Post #18 » by **PkrsBcksGphsMqt** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:36 am

It doesn't matter what TO and Rodgers say, it comes down to what TT and MM think is best for the team. I find it hard to believe that TT would be in favor of a move like this. Not sure how MM would feel about it though.

Mags FTW · Post #19 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:51 am

Unlike Moss, he's never been accused of taking plays off. Always goes 100%. The knock on him has been his antics, but he behaved pretty well this year.

Mags FTW · Post #20 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:10 am

From the club, to the Wii.