Haywood for Trade Exemption?

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

User avatar
Wolverine
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,271
And1: 119
Joined: Jul 27, 2002

Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#1 » by Wolverine » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:16 am

Anyone hear about this rumour????
User avatar
Neon Black
Starter
Posts: 2,294
And1: 19
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
Location: Salt Lake City

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#2 » by Neon Black » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:18 am

not yet
drivewayball
Suspended
Posts: 1,443
And1: 68
Joined: Dec 03, 2008

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#3 » by drivewayball » Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:04 pm

That would be nice ... but would hardly solve the Jazz money problem. Another deal would have to be made to dump a bunch o salary elsewhere. A trade to get Haywood that involved Okur would be a better option.
outerspacefella
Analyst
Posts: 3,169
And1: 73
Joined: Jul 08, 2006

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#4 » by outerspacefella » Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:19 pm

Having watched Amare (and other bug dudes...) playing a bunch of games this season amd knowing dude will sign a huge extension somewhere... I'll tell you.... Okur's not bad at all... even in a little bit of a slump....
Zemsta
Ballboy
Posts: 47
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 13, 2006
Location: POLAND

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#5 » by Zemsta » Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:31 pm

Wolverine wrote:Anyone hear about this rumour????


anyone can tell me what is trade exemption?
Poland Jazz!
rick333
Sophomore
Posts: 117
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
     

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#6 » by rick333 » Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:04 pm

David Locke proposed that idea to KOC on his radio show before the Suns game.

I don't know how much merit it has to it.

Locke stated that if the Jazz brass felt they only needed a solidified backup center to put them over the top, that Haywood is the only guy out there.
User avatar
Racer X
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,913
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
Location: S L C

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#7 » by Racer X » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:00 pm

He also mentioned that the Wizards were not willing to do it for salary relief only.
Image
User avatar
QuantumMacgyver
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,453
And1: 42
Joined: Jul 07, 2008

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#8 » by QuantumMacgyver » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:03 pm

There's nothing to this. The Wiz have already said that they "aren't moving Haywood", which as we all know could just as likely mean "We are moving Haywood'. But simply for cap relief? I don't see it. However if we take Butler off their hands I'm sure we could get Haywood too. Boozer for Butler and Haywood has been many Jazz fans wet dreams.
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,536
And1: 9,467
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#9 » by DelaneyRudd » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:24 pm

Zemsta wrote:
Wolverine wrote:Anyone hear about this rumour????


anyone can tell me what is trade exemption?

A trade exception is created when you trade away a player and do not recieve back the same amount of salary.

If you trade away a 10 million dollar player to a team under the cap for a 5 million dollar player you now have a 5 million dollar trade exception that can be used like a player with a 5 million dollar salary. The thing is you can't combine these exceptions.
kebutah
Analyst
Posts: 3,533
And1: 99
Joined: Feb 10, 2005
Location: Clearfield Utah
       

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#10 » by kebutah » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:29 pm

You actually pick up the difference plus $100K if used in a nonsimultaneous (later) situation.
Fido
Veteran
Posts: 2,581
And1: 83
Joined: Feb 25, 2001
   

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#11 » by Fido » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:08 pm

Locke has discussed using the trade exceptions a fair number of times in recent weeks as now that the team is playing better he doesn't see them trading key players. Soo......if you look around the league at who they may be able to get with a trade exception (where other players cannot be included and the player can only make Harpring's salary), Haywood is the only "desirable" player out there. Now that Arenas is suspended for the rest of the year, speculation is the Wizards may want to dump salary to reduce luxury tax liability. But all this is speculation.
Zemsta
Ballboy
Posts: 47
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 13, 2006
Location: POLAND

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#12 » by Zemsta » Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:27 am

DelaneyRudd wrote:
Zemsta wrote:
Wolverine wrote:Anyone hear about this rumour????


anyone can tell me what is trade exemption?

A trade exception is created when you trade away a player and do not recieve back the same amount of salary.

If you trade away a 10 million dollar player to a team under the cap for a 5 million dollar player you now have a 5 million dollar trade exception that can be used like a player with a 5 million dollar salary. The thing is you can't combine these exceptions.


thx!!
Poland Jazz!
User avatar
J_Ray
Pro Prospect
Posts: 983
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 15, 2005
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#13 » by J_Ray » Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:39 pm

I didn't see a general trade thread, so I figured I would bring it up here. What about Mike Miller in a Jazz uniform? He seems like the ideal player to fit Sloan's system w/ his above average passing, B-Ball IQ, and his shooting touch is something Utah could use. Korver & Miles for Mike Miller as the base of a deal?
Check my blog for a fresh outlook on the NBA:https://dimestonylon.wordpress.com
User avatar
seejaydeja
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,450
And1: 53
Joined: Nov 03, 2005
Location: provo
         

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#14 » by seejaydeja » Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:44 pm

i honestly don't see how miller differentiates himself from korver. at this point i'd rather hold on to kyle.
Image
hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#15 » by hoops4life » Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:46 pm

Looking at the wiretap, Wizards are funny.

They expect to not get full value for their trades but they want both Rudy and Batum for Haywood. Doesn't make sense to me much.
User avatar
seejaydeja
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,450
And1: 53
Joined: Nov 03, 2005
Location: provo
         

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#16 » by seejaydeja » Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:47 pm

hoops4life wrote:Looking at the wiretap, Wizards are funny.

They expect to not get full value for their trades but they want both Rudy and Batum for Haywood. Doesn't make sense to me much.



saw that too. if thats what they want for haywood then **** it
Image
User avatar
J_Ray
Pro Prospect
Posts: 983
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 15, 2005
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#17 » by J_Ray » Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:18 pm

seejaydeja wrote:i honestly don't see how miller differentiates himself from korver. at this point i'd rather hold on to kyle.


Really? Well Mike Miller is more than just a shooter if you haven't noticed. Through his career he has shown the ability to take over games w/ his shooting touch, while also doing work on the boards and making the extra pass. Korver's career season high for rebounding is 4.6, which is well in the past for him while Mike Miller has been well over 5 rpg the last 5 season and 3.5-4.5 apg he has also been putting up. Mike Miller is very comparable to a Jeff Hornacek, definitely more athletic than Horny was IMO. Miller is also a veteran that will help in road games, rather than fade ala majority of the team. Check this link, it's comparison of Hornacek and Miller for both of their careers up to Miller's current age of 29. This also works a bit since Miller is expiring, and doesn't lock down cap space like a Rip Hamilton or a few others that have been brought up.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... i?id=YuO9J
Check my blog for a fresh outlook on the NBA:https://dimestonylon.wordpress.com
User avatar
StocktonShorts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,386
And1: 2,551
Joined: Jun 02, 2009
   

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#18 » by StocktonShorts » Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:34 pm

I'd do Korver + Miles for Miller. Unfortunately it means the Jazz would take on extra salary this year.
Image
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,536
And1: 9,467
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#19 » by DelaneyRudd » Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:25 pm

I don't blame the Wiz. You don't salary dump without a concise plan for the future. They need time to sort that out. It's too easy for rash decisions to propel you into a decade long hole of no escape.
Charlie_S
Rookie
Posts: 1,067
And1: 87
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Italy

Re: Haywood for Trade Exemption? 

Post#20 » by Charlie_S » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:38 pm

HappyProle wrote:I'd do Korver + Miles for Miller. Unfortunately it means the Jazz would take on extra salary this year.


Haywood+Miller+(Young) for Memo+Korver+Miles?
9-men rotation: Deron - Miller - AK - Boozer - Haywood starting with Price, Brewer, Matthews and Millsap coming off the bench. I'd like that.

Return to Utah Jazz