ImageImageImage

ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala"

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#1 » by campybatman » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:30 pm

Interesting... But he has Iguodala starting at small forward. So, where does Pierce start? I don't think he can guard shooting guards anymore.



For these reasons, I have concluded that there is only one trade the Celtics should make in the next two weeks should the opportunity arise: some combination of Allen for Andre Iguodala.

Iguodala is the perfect fit for this Celtics team. He is already known for his defensive prowess and he is the perfect up-tempo player to complement Rajon Rondo. Pierce is also shooting a career-best 47 percent from 3 this season, so Pierce taking over the exclusive 3-point-shooting duties from Allen is not outlandish, especially with Eddie House coming off of the bench.



The bottom line is that the pros outweigh the cons with this trade -- at least in terms of guarantees. There is no guarantee that Allen is just going through a tough stretch and will snap out of it to become his old self again. However, there is a guarantee that Iguodala will remain 26 years old for the rest of the season.


http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page ... unday-dime
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#2 » by klemen4 » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:33 pm

However, there is a guarantee that Iguodala will remain 26 years old for the rest of the season.
:D

Good one...

We really need to get more athletic and young
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
BillessuR6
General Manager
Posts: 8,786
And1: 2,614
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
 

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#3 » by BillessuR6 » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:34 pm

We need some ATHLETICISM! Igoudala would be perfect but I doubt Philly will trade him to a division rival. I have been saying for weeks: Ray+whatever filler they want for Iguodala+Dalambert...
User avatar
SichtingLives
RealGM
Posts: 40,893
And1: 25,460
Joined: Mar 25, 2009

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#4 » by SichtingLives » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:35 pm

Wow, Brenden Jackson. A little late to that party, must be nice to skim column ideas off of websites like this.
10 miles through the snow uphill both ways
User avatar
Avalanche
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,522
And1: 1,498
Joined: May 21, 2007
Location: Australia
Contact:
     

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#5 » by Avalanche » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:37 pm

well hes 100% right..

Iguadala helps us in so many ways..

defensively he improves the wing D no end

helps on the boards, he is a good rebounder from the wing

athletecism/energy.. something this team sorely lacks

a guy to attack the basket

etc etc etc...

also, he would defend 2 guards, but would allow pierce to play more of a jump shooting role and save his body for the playoffs, allowing andre to attack the rim

i really hope its being explored and discussed... i dont think it will happen, but im hopeful at least
Image
User avatar
Al-Haqq
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 1
Joined: May 30, 2007

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#6 » by Al-Haqq » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:44 pm

I'm certain there are fans here who STILL prefer Ray Allen.

No doubt, absolutely no doubt Danny should pull the trigger on this one - if possible.

But I doubt he will.

He firmly believes, as does Doc that this C's team can win it all.
User avatar
SichtingLives
RealGM
Posts: 40,893
And1: 25,460
Joined: Mar 25, 2009

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#7 » by SichtingLives » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:46 pm

Here's the problem. Igoudala is worth and will pull SOOOOOOOOO much more than Ray Allen could in a trade. Unless we get stuck with Dalembert we would be fleecing Philly.
10 miles through the snow uphill both ways
User avatar
Avalanche
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,522
And1: 1,498
Joined: May 21, 2007
Location: Australia
Contact:
     

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#8 » by Avalanche » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:51 pm

DunkOnFace wrote:Here's the problem. Igoudala is worth and will pull SOOOOOOOOO much more than Ray Allen could in a trade. Unless we get stuck with Dalembert we would be fleecing Philly.

re-route delambert to the kings for kenny thomas' expiring
Image
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#9 » by The Rondo Show » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:52 pm

Only way I could see us getting Iguodala is if we agreed to take on Elton Brand's deal, not Dalembert's. Which I'm pretty sure we won't do.
Image
User avatar
Al-Haqq
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 1
Joined: May 30, 2007

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#10 » by Al-Haqq » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:56 pm

Cavs are going to make a move for Jamison or Troy Murphy.

LA are going to go after Kirk Hinrich [possibly].

Celtics: we like our team. Sure we can't win games and play with no passion, but I like our team.
darrendaye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,033
And1: 10,040
Joined: May 06, 2001
Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
     

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#11 » by darrendaye » Sun Feb 7, 2010 10:58 pm

I'd be interested to see how they would function with Iggy. My concern is that he, too, is a subpar outside shooter. My opinion of the two slasher offense has been articulated often, ad nauseum most likely. But the other side of it is my contention that having three inside oriented scorers WOULD be troublesome from a spacing standpoint. So Rondo, IGGY, and Perk, IMO, is not an ideal mix. Also IGGY, I believe, still wants to create much of his own offense and may be a ball sticker, at least initially. He may struggle to adjust, assuming he was willing to adjust in the first place.
Baylor is Brat.
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#12 » by campybatman » Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:00 pm

I disagree with the part about Pierce making up for the lost of Ray in the area of three-pointers. Pierce has changed his shooting form and it has improved his shooting this season. Namely, an improvement in his three-point percentage. However, who's to say that Pierce can sustain this career best in three-point percentage going into next season. Also, Pierce can be clutch at times in the fourth quarter, but you don't replace the clutch performances of a Ray Allen from over his NBA career overnight.

If you got Iguodala, then I see Pierce regulated to the bench in a sixth man role. But I don't think Pierce has reached that point to where his skills have declined that dramatically.
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,949
And1: 8,991
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#13 » by canman1971 » Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:01 pm

Al-Haqq wrote:Cavs are going to make a move for Jamison or Troy Murphy.

LA are going to go after Kirk Hinrich [possibly].

Celtics: we like our team. Sure we can't win games and play with no passion, but I like our team.


Well, in the Cs defense, Ainge never addresses trades/speculation. Now, ask me how I feel on February 19, and it may be different. But I certainly don't want Ainge to say, "man, I hate our team. We stink. We play with no heart. Our players suck. Wanna make a trade?"
User avatar
Avalanche
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,522
And1: 1,498
Joined: May 21, 2007
Location: Australia
Contact:
     

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#14 » by Avalanche » Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:01 pm

darrendaye wrote:I'd be interested to see how they would function with Iggy. My concern is that he, too, is a subpar outside shooter. My opinion of the two slasher offense has been articulated often, ad nauseum most likely. But the other side of it is my contention that having three inside oriented scorers WOULD be troublesome from a spacing standpoint. So Rondo, IGGY, and Perk, IMO, is not an ideal mix. Also IGGY, I believe, still wants to create much of his own offense and may be a ball sticker, at least initially. He may struggle to adjust, assuming he was willing to adjust in the first place.

true.. however we do have an array of outside shooters on the team aswell if you include long 2's with KG, Sheed, Paul and Eddie in a playoff rotation

would be 4 inside (rondo, iguadala, daniels, perkins)

and 4 outside (KG, Sheed, Paul, Eddie) threats, with Davis in there as a bit of both

It would take a bit of coaching (look out doc you may have to actually DO something) to chnge the offense a little, but i think it could work
Image
Bill Lumbergh
General Manager
Posts: 9,666
And1: 11,634
Joined: Jul 12, 2009
 

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#15 » by Bill Lumbergh » Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:08 pm

Al-Haqq wrote:I'm certain there are fans here who STILL prefer Ray Allen.

No doubt, absolutely no doubt Danny should pull the trigger on this one - if possible.

But I doubt he will.

He firmly believes, as does Doc that this C's team can win it all.

I think they're delusional if they still believe that.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#16 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:29 pm

If I could write an article, here is what it would look like.


For these reasons, I have concluded that there is only one trade the Celtics should make in the next two weeks should the opportunity arise: some combination of Allen for LeBron James.

James is the perfect fit for this Celtics team. He is already known for his defensive prowess and he is the perfect up-tempo player to complement Rajon Rondo. Pierce is also shooting a career-best 47 percent from 3 this season, so Pierce taking over the exclusive 3-point-shooting duties from Allen is not outlandish, especially with Eddie House coming off of the bench.



Get **** real. SHOULD?SHOULD?Come on..We have absolutely nothing to offer for Iguodala. The Suns are discussing trading Amar'e for him, why the **** would they GIVE him to us? It's not that simple people...if there was any possible way we could get him, he would be here by now.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
tfmiii
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,510
And1: 2,588
Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Location: home, home on the Front Range

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#17 » by tfmiii » Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:37 pm

iggy can't shoot, he is a "volume scorer" which equals great stats on lousy teams. and speaking of lousy, look at his contract.... much prefer Kevin Martin or even Caron Butler
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#18 » by CelticFaninLBC » Sun Feb 7, 2010 11:49 pm

I don't see Iggy being dealt for only an expiring deal, and can't see Amare wanting to be in Philly.
User avatar
irie
RealGM
Posts: 11,353
And1: 4,502
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#19 » by irie » Mon Feb 8, 2010 12:05 am

what they should do =/= what they can do.
|
User avatar
Scalamental
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,616
And1: 146
Joined: Dec 02, 2007

Re: ESPN: "Celtics Should Get Iguodala" 

Post#20 » by Scalamental » Mon Feb 8, 2010 12:31 am

tfmiii wrote:iggy can't shoot, he is a "volume scorer" which equals great stats on lousy teams. and speaking of lousy, look at his contract.... much prefer Kevin Martin or even Caron Butler


Pretty much my feeling for him, except I wouldn't trade ray ray for martin or butler.

Return to Boston Celtics


cron