ImageImageImage

Would trading Chucker Wallace achieve anything?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

DelMonte West
Veteran
Posts: 2,945
And1: 685
Joined: Jan 10, 2006

Re: Would trading Chucker Wallace achieve anything? 

Post#21 » by DelMonte West » Mon Feb 8, 2010 2:54 pm

CrymeTime wrote:If Wallace can be traded to save some cash.

Boston gets
Marcus Banks (expires next year @ about $4.7 Million)
Patrick O'Bryant (min/expire)
Domonic McGuire (expire)

Toronto gets
Rasheed Wallace
Caron Butler
Earl Boykins

Washington gets
Jose Calderon
Rasho Nesterovic
Toronto 2nd rounder
Bill Walker


That's gross. Why not just take out McGuire and put in Blount instead. Blount, Banks, and O'Bryant. At least it could be good in a "so bad it's funny" sort of way.
Hemingway
Banned User
Posts: 3,725
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: Would trading Chucker Wallace achieve anything? 

Post#22 » by Hemingway » Mon Feb 8, 2010 3:17 pm

He is still gettting into shape and the plan all along has been for him to avoid the paint and contact as much as possible until the playoffs.

With posts like these I ask myself, "Did we really exect this team to be great this season?" I like our chances at getting to the finals.
User avatar
irie
RealGM
Posts: 11,353
And1: 4,502
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Would trading Chucker Wallace achieve anything? 

Post#23 » by irie » Mon Feb 8, 2010 5:38 pm

CrymeTime wrote:If Wallace can be traded to save some cash.

Boston gets
Marcus Banks (expires next year @ about $4.7 Million)
Patrick O'Bryant (min/expire)
Domonic McGuire (expire)

Toronto gets
Rasheed Wallace
Caron Butler
Earl Boykins

Washington gets
Jose Calderon
Rasho Nesterovic
Toronto 2nd rounder
Bill Walker


I think it's a bit too easy to say "we would be better if..."

Because this trade would make us even worse. Who would be our primary big on the offensive end? Davis? Shelden? That would be atrocious.
|

Return to Boston Celtics