ImageImageImageImageImage

Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31)

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#1 » by a-rod » Tue Feb 9, 2010 12:27 am

Image

Image
Image

Image

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Image

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Luv those Knicks wrote:Re-draft the 2003 class
Am I the only one who'd take Melo over Wade? because I would without hesitation.

LeBron
Melo
Wade


Image
MadFishX wrote:
ProjectChester wrote:Hedo's wife FTW, donating 26 tickets to retared kids. Good for her and Hedo.

did you get a ticket too?


Image
Nate Robinson tried to get out of an arrest for a driving violation on Tuesday, sources told the New York Post. Robinson was pulled over for driving without a seat belt and then arrested for driving with a suspended license. Sources claim that he cranked up his stereo when the officer walked back to check his license and that he sang along with the music when the officer returned. When the guard realized that he was going to be arrested, sources said he replied: “Well, I’m Nate Robinson from the Knicks.” “OK, Nate Robinson from the Knicks, you’re under arrest,” the cop replied.


Image

Image
Nice all-around skills for a player his age... Good shooting and ballhandling skills... Pretty strong already... Mediocre rebounder.


Image

Image
The Sacramento Kings are enduring a dismal stretch on the road. A visit to Madison Square Garden to face the New York Knicks may help them break out of that slump.Sacramento looks to continue its recent strong play over the Knicks in New York and snap an 11-game road losing streak Tuesday night.

Link
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#2 » by a-rod » Tue Feb 9, 2010 12:41 am

Early Gamethread might change our luck...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Opposite

PS: I'm sorry Wolfay, I Just Couldn't Help It :lol:
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
I am Ra
Banned User
Posts: 6,059
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#3 » by I am Ra » Tue Feb 9, 2010 12:43 am

very nicely done gamethread. this is a must win for the knicks but best of luck to you guys and hope for no injuries.

and LOL @ the if they mated. kid looks deformed.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#4 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Tue Feb 9, 2010 1:34 am

Until I have reason to believe otherwise, I'm gonna say Kings lose.

PS good GT as always.
User avatar
Wolfay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,656
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 13, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
       

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#5 » by Wolfay » Tue Feb 9, 2010 2:50 am

a-rod wrote:Early Gamethread might change our luck...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Opposite

PS: I'm sorry Wolfay, I Just Couldn't Help It :lol:


Get your shots in while you can, because you'll be bowing down to my superior basketball knowledge before too long!

And playing okay against Raptors ain't no thang, considering how awful on defense they are.
Image
Silver Man
Starter
Posts: 2,129
And1: 644
Joined: Jun 03, 2007
 

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#6 » by Silver Man » Tue Feb 9, 2010 3:07 am

Spencer's rebounding is beyond average. The fact that our starting center can't even grab seven boards a game.
User avatar
Joseph17
RealGM
Posts: 10,430
And1: 529
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: New York
   

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#7 » by Joseph17 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 3:42 am

I'm debating on whether or not I should go to this game.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#8 » by SacKingZZZ » Tue Feb 9, 2010 4:58 am

I'd go if I were you, I have a major feeling Kevin's going to break out of his funk and explode!!!
User avatar
Joseph17
RealGM
Posts: 10,430
And1: 529
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: New York
   

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#9 » by Joseph17 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 5:44 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:I'd go if I were you, I have a major feeling Kevin's going to break out of his funk and explode!!!

I want to go but I'm thinking that it'll be more trouble than it's worth. Finding parking near MSG is a bitch and I get out of class an hour before the game.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#10 » by pillwenney » Tue Feb 9, 2010 12:22 pm

Well, definitely a winnable game. And it sure would be nice to get that 17th win before the all-star break. It's certainly not where we thought we'd be a while ago, but it would give a reason to go into the break on a positive note.
User avatar
perezident
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,823
And1: 73
Joined: Mar 12, 2009
Location: On the beautiful island of the Bahamas. Where I was born
       

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#11 » by perezident » Tue Feb 9, 2010 3:30 pm

Mitch this is so not a winnable game. Knicks are a better team right about now imho. I got a source saying to me that this is the "mark game" If we lose this game you can expect a move to go down (as for the move...I don't know).

Spurs Boston and Kings need to get together and work something out
Smills91 wrote:You guys are idiots....
If you sleep on Beno, he can drop 30/10 on you.

^Shall remain until this happens :rofl:

theo42 wrote:If you think Philly isn't getting better you will be shocked with how they play this year.

^ :lol: (7/4/15)
User avatar
mobiuseinz
Analyst
Posts: 3,440
And1: 8
Joined: Oct 29, 2005

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#12 » by mobiuseinz » Tue Feb 9, 2010 3:51 pm

Since I am going to this game tonight, they better win... other than that I hope Tyreke Evans has a triple-double...
------------------------------

We might lose this one, so brace yourselves
Image
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#13 » by ICMTM » Tue Feb 9, 2010 4:02 pm

If this is a "make game" for us I question who's been watching, OR someone else has been more patient than me with some of our players. I just don't get why now?
KANGZZZZZ!
User avatar
perezident
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,823
And1: 73
Joined: Mar 12, 2009
Location: On the beautiful island of the Bahamas. Where I was born
       

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#14 » by perezident » Tue Feb 9, 2010 6:04 pm

I dnt have the slightest idea bro. But, I'll say this much it makes sense to me really. We are currently in 5th spot in terms of the draft. If we make a deal for expirings and maybe an additional pick we'd be sitting good. I've been saying this for a minute now, having multiple picks in this draft would be MONEY imo.

Scenario: We lose the "mark game" and get a deal done with Utah and Philly, where we end up with Dalembert, Holiday Brewer and Knicks pick (for w/e package we send surrounding KT Martin and Noc). We remain 5th in the lotto and end up with the 3rd pick and the knicks pick land us the 5th pick.

We'd look like this going into the draft

Hawes/Dally
JT/#5/Brockman
Brewer/Casspi/Donte
Cisco/#3
Evans/Beno/Holiday

We'd be looking good imo.
Smills91 wrote:You guys are idiots....
If you sleep on Beno, he can drop 30/10 on you.

^Shall remain until this happens :rofl:

theo42 wrote:If you think Philly isn't getting better you will be shocked with how they play this year.

^ :lol: (7/4/15)
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#15 » by ICMTM » Tue Feb 9, 2010 6:20 pm

Just for the record I was the only one who saw value in the Knicks pick (via Utah)
KANGZZZZZ!
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#16 » by a-rod » Tue Feb 9, 2010 6:59 pm

Wolfay wrote:Get your shots in while you can, because you'll be bowing down to my superior basketball knowledge before too long!

And playing okay against Raptors ain't no thang, considering how awful on defense they are.

Obviously you missed the joke.

What i was trying say is, Some people will believe anything so long as it supports what they already believe. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their agenda.

I'm sorry if I offended you....

perezident wrote:Mitch this is so not a winnable game. Knicks are a better team right about now imho. I got a source saying to me that this is the "mark game" If we lose this game you can expect a move to go down (as for the move...I don't know).

Spurs Boston and Kings need to get together and work something out

Yeah no way the knicks are better team than us, they been playing Eastern Conference a weaker competition. And they have better much much much better coach. That is why they have better record.

I respectfully think that we have passed the Knicks talent wise...

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Until I have reason to believe otherwise, I'm gonna say Kings lose.

PS good GT as always.

Thanks Nicky...
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
cdt3
Rookie
Posts: 1,183
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 17, 2008

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#17 » by cdt3 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 7:23 pm

Check out the Double-double list sometime. Thompson trails Amare by 2, BLopez and EOkafor by 6.

JT has more 10 rebound games or 20pt games than Hawes or Greene.

This is all after struggling a month. He did struggle offensively but continued to do everything else. If Westphal doesn't cut his minutes by nearly 10 Thompson likely would have had 3-4 more double-doubles in the last month. Not to mention he was on pace for one last game but only got 22mins even when shooting 4 of 7.

Good lookin out COACH WESTPHAL!! Way to help out a young big man trying to build confidence.

Why are Kings fans not furious with Westphal?

When Thompson played 34 minutes the Kings were 14-17. Since Westphal has Thompson playing only 24 mins the Kings are 2-17. Yes the schedule was tougher but they could have at least won 33% of the games.

Why are Kings fans not furious with Westphal?

Not playing your number one young big man is like this team sitting Tyreke in crunchtime if he was missing shots. Even if they struggle offensively complete players can make defensive plays. Leaders are just too valuable to sit.
GrapeApe
Pro Prospect
Posts: 819
And1: 14
Joined: Oct 25, 2004
Location: Where bananas grow

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#18 » by GrapeApe » Tue Feb 9, 2010 7:30 pm

ICMTM wrote:Just for the record I was the only one who saw value in the Knicks pick (via Utah)


I think everyone saw the value in that pick. In fact, most people are probably surprise at how bad the pick is going to be.

perezident wrote:Scenario: We lose the "mark game" and get a deal done with Utah and Philly, where we end up with Dalembert, Holiday Brewer and Knicks pick (for w/e package we send surrounding KT Martin and Noc). We remain 5th in the lotto and end up with the 3rd pick and the knicks pick land us the 5th pick.


Knicks are currently 8th in the lottery. If form holds they could not have the 5th pick. It is, however, possible that the Knicks pick results in the 3rd pick and the Kings' pick remains #5.

mobiuseinz wrote:Since I am going to this game tonight, they better win... other than that I hope Tyreke Evans has a triple-double...


I hope Donte Greene has a triple-double.
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#19 » by KingInExile » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:21 pm

Game is too early for me to catch unless I sneak out of the office early. Hmmm...that sounds like an idea...
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
deNIEd
Banned User
Posts: 4,942
And1: 30
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: Sacramento (16-34) @ New York (19-31) 

Post#20 » by deNIEd » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:25 pm

Return to Sacramento Kings