ImageImageImage

Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23)

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,845
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#201 » by Qwigglez » Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:22 pm

So Nash has back problems which would be why he is struggling lately.
User avatar
Never Fear 33 Is Here
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 60
Joined: Sep 18, 2004
Location: DP09 Brotherhood: NF33IH, -SDU-, TASTIC, nevetsov, KPCB34, Frank Lee, Miklo, Rodrizzle, Cash
Contact:
         

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#202 » by Never Fear 33 Is Here » Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:40 pm

phx#7 wrote:
BurningHeart wrote:So according to Coro, the Suns are 12th overall in opponents FG%, ahead of teams like DEN, DAL, POR, ATL, and HOU. We are 6th worst rebounding team, only ahead of MIL, NY, IND, and GS.

Seems to prove that, like I've said for ten years now, the Suns aren't so much a bad defensive team, than are piss-poor at closing out stops, giving up second chances, and points.

I'd love for people to stop buying the "Suns dont play D" ****.


A lot of that has to do with the scrambling D that gets guys out of position to get boards. When the Suns had KT they were able to play straight up with him on the court and did better on the boards.


Ummmmm, you do realise DEFENSIVE Rebounding is a part of DEFENCE right? Whilst I agree with you that we are not as bad as some people think, our DEFENSIVE Rebounding leaves a lot to be desired.
Image
Props to Kerrsed for the sig
phx#7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,957
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Location: Colbert Nation

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#203 » by phx#7 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:56 pm

Never Fear 33 Is Here wrote:Ummmmm, you do realise DEFENSIVE Rebounding is a part of DEFENCE right? Whilst I agree with you that we are not as bad as some people think, our DEFENSIVE Rebounding leaves a lot to be desired.


You do realise that is exactly what I implied right? Or did you miss quote me? It is the Suns inability to play straight up D for the most part that gets them killed on the board so frequently.
DaDragicShow
Banned User
Posts: 4,337
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#204 » by DaDragicShow » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:58 pm

You do realize that you didn't spell "realize" correctly?
phx#7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,957
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Location: Colbert Nation

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#205 » by phx#7 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:07 pm

arizonaplaya85 wrote:You do realize that you didn't spell "realize" correctly?


You do realise that either can be correct? Like defence and defense. But thanks for the attempt grammar police, guess you'll have to work harder to reach your internet spelling quota.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#206 » by rsavaj » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:50 pm

Everybody: we won a game against a great team! Lighten up :).
User avatar
MaryvalesFinest
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Location: Back

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#207 » by MaryvalesFinest » Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:09 pm

After winning last nights game the Suns have a 94.3% chance of making the playoffs now according to ESPN's playoff calculator, they can't possibly blow it right?
DBrimstone
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,819
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 01, 2009

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#208 » by DBrimstone » Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:19 pm

rsavaj wrote:Everybody: we won a game against a great team! Lighten up :).

you do realize that we won because we had 8 more points than them at the end of regulation? If we had say, 8 points less, we totally would have lost
User avatar
WTFsunsFTW
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 113
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
 

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#209 » by WTFsunsFTW » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:41 pm

DBrimstone wrote:
rsavaj wrote:Everybody: we won a game against a great team! Lighten up :).

you do realize that we won because we had 8 more points than them at the end of regulation? If we had say, 8 points less, we totally would have lost

This is probably the worst comment made in the history of comments.
User avatar
Stix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,337
And1: 2,655
Joined: Jul 26, 2007
Location: Phoenix
 

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#210 » by Stix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:58 pm

Kerrsed wrote:Image
Image
Image


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Mr. Sun
General Manager
Posts: 9,927
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#211 » by Mr. Sun » Sun Feb 21, 2010 12:35 am

Phoenix– Woody, subdued and contemplative at this morning’s light practice, acknowledged that his strategy of playing his starters heavy minutes was a big factor in the Hawks’ loss to the Suns last night.

“I did something last night I haven’t done all year in terms of playing six guys,” he said. “I really thought we could beat those guys like that but it backfired on me because their second unit beat us.”

User avatar
Never Fear 33 Is Here
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 60
Joined: Sep 18, 2004
Location: DP09 Brotherhood: NF33IH, -SDU-, TASTIC, nevetsov, KPCB34, Frank Lee, Miklo, Rodrizzle, Cash
Contact:
         

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#212 » by Never Fear 33 Is Here » Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:05 am

phx#7 wrote:
Never Fear 33 Is Here wrote:Ummmmm, you do realise DEFENSIVE Rebounding is a part of DEFENCE right? Whilst I agree with you that we are not as bad as some people think, our DEFENSIVE Rebounding leaves a lot to be desired.


You do realise that is exactly what I implied right? Or did you miss quote me? It is the Suns inability to play straight up D for the most part that gets them killed on the board so frequently.


Yeah miss quoted. I was actually only meant to quote the poster that you quoted.

And for the realise realize argument.

realize
1611, "bring into existence," from Fr. réaliser "make real," from M.Fr. real "actual," from O.Fr. (see real (adj.)). Sense of "understand clearly" is first recorded 1775.

realise
British spelling of realize (q.v.); for suffix, see -ize.


Oh yeah, you also realise realize that color can be spelt colour right?
Image
Props to Kerrsed for the sig
DBrimstone
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,819
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 01, 2009

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#213 » by DBrimstone » Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:32 am

WTFsunsFTW wrote:
DBrimstone wrote:
rsavaj wrote:Everybody: we won a game against a great team! Lighten up :).

you do realize that we won because we had 8 more points than them at the end of regulation? If we had say, 8 points less, we totally would have lost

This is probably the worst comment made in the history of comments.

Internet sarcasm. Not always understood or recognized.
User avatar
impulsenine
Analyst
Posts: 3,272
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 10, 2007
Location: Tucson
Contact:

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#214 » by impulsenine » Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:42 am

Jdiddy701 wrote:
Mr. Sun wrote:I like to see Dragic start and Nash come off the bench.


You can't be serious. Suns fans are the worse. As soon as someone struggles, it's either trade him! or take him out! or bench him! or something stupid. Everyone sees Amare doing good and get happy that he never was traded. As soon as he has 2 bad games, I'll see posts saying how Kerr was stupid to keep him. I stay true to the whole team. Go Suns and keep provin the haters wrong!


I think this was more in response to Nash's health, and that Dragic is (as stated and generally agreed) very good at keeping people out of their rhythm. If depriving the opposing starting PG a rhythm for his first 5-10 minutes helps Nash's back and screws up the opposing guard's rhythm, it's fine.

But only if both criteria are true.
Image
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,553
And1: 14,845
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#215 » by Qwigglez » Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:53 pm

DBrimstone wrote:
rsavaj wrote:Everybody: we won a game against a great team! Lighten up :).

you do realize that we won because we had 8 more points than them at the end of regulation? If we had say, 8 points less, we totally would have lost

Lol!
User avatar
sunsfan13az
Junior
Posts: 350
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 21, 2008

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#216 » by sunsfan13az » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:04 pm

Was away and out of town for a while but very solid win for the suns vs the hawks that started a little winning streak!!!! Good job suns
schnakenpopanz
General Manager
Posts: 8,921
And1: 3,205
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Location: Germany
Contact:
 

Re: Game 56: Atlanta(34-18) @ Phoenix( 32-23) 

Post#217 » by schnakenpopanz » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:14 pm

our win does look a bit better when you watch the hawks beating the jazz. why do we always have to talk our own success down?
Ishiba is a BUSINESS MAN!

Return to Phoenix Suns