ImageImageImage

#3 + Rubio for #1

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Rubio + #3 for #1 (Wall)

KEEP RUBIO + #3!!
24
59%
I'd lean towards keeping what we got
3
7%
neutral
3
7%
I'd lean towards getting Wall
4
10%
GO GET WALL!!
7
17%
 
Total votes: 41

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

#3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#1 » by shrink » Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:57 am

If MIN got the third pick, would you make this trade?

MIN GETS: #1 (Wall)

NJN GETS: #3 + Rubio
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#2 » by the_bruce » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:12 am

This would be as foolish as when MN posters wanted to do #5 & #6 for #2(rubio). I wouldn't do this and I'm not even a huge rubio fan, but I'm coming around.

While I'm not a huge fan of euros. Rubio was hyped as much as any overseas prospect I had ever seen. Then here I was complaining about how he can't shoot, doesn't elevate on his jumper, etc etc. I just didn't see it at the time. Many people see Wall as the superior prospect I tend to agree, but not to the extent of adding another potentially franchise changing talent from the #3 pick.

1 of Favors, Cousins, Monroe, Aldrich + Rubio or Wall(or Turner)
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,427
And1: 1,118
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#3 » by TheProdigy » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:13 am

It really depends on whether Evan Turner is available at #3. If he's there we gotta keep the pick and Rubio. If he's not available then it's all in for Wall.
digitaldropoff
Starter
Posts: 2,019
And1: 520
Joined: Sep 06, 2007

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#4 » by digitaldropoff » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:25 am

Absolutely not...there has been more than one analyst saying Ricky would be a top five pick even thise year. Call him the 5th pick....so something like the 3rd and 5th for John Wall does not do it for me at all. We could package our third with another plus a younger player like Sessions to drop down and get Turner. Either way, John Wall isn't worth that much. I might be bias, because I actually think Turner is going to be the better player in the NBA.
diggity_88
Junior
Posts: 306
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 26, 2009

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#5 » by diggity_88 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:48 am

Man if u guys can get Turner, u guys have 5 legit young all star potential prospects in Flynn, Rubio, Turner, Love, and Jefferson. Now all you gotta do is pull of some trades to turn flynn/rubio and love/jefferson into a SG and a C
Biff Cooper
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,732
And1: 318
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Northern Minnesota
 

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#6 » by Biff Cooper » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:49 am

I don't know enough about Favors or Cousins to say for sure, but I'd probably do this trade.
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,427
And1: 1,118
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#7 » by TheProdigy » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:55 am

Hmmmm... The thought of Rubio throwing lobs to Wes Johnson has me second guessing.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#8 » by Esohny » Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:14 am

Way too expensive.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#9 » by southern wolf » Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:19 am

I'd lean towards getting Wall, but i'm really not a big Rubio fan.
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#10 » by dunkonu21 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:50 am

1000xRubio.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#11 » by AQuintus » Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:03 am

From what I've seen of them both, Wall is a better NBA prospect and has more value than Rubio, but he doesn't have more value than Rubio + Favors (who could be a duo similar to Nash and Amare) or Rubio + Cousins, etc.
Image
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#12 » by horaceworthy » Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:13 am

No reason to combine Rubio and the pick for Wall. There isn't a big enough separation.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
Diggler
Sophomore
Posts: 120
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 28, 2009

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#13 » by Diggler » Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:27 am

How high would Rubio go without baggage? He's probably be worth at least the fourth pick even with contract complications, and he'd obviously be more valuable if he could play right away. Rubio without contract issues would warrant serious consideration at the very top of the draft, so it's almost like giving up this years #3 PLUS a future #1 or #2 overall. Why should we give Rubio away for a discount when we can afford to wait for full value?
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#14 » by IAmTheTruth » Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:57 am

I easily do this trade. Wall is a better prospect and player than Ricky in every single way imaginable. If Derrick Favors, who has incredibly high bust potential, is all it takes then I jump on this trade in half a second and laugh at whoever accepts.
Don't ban me
User avatar
wildvikeswolves
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 577
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
       

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#15 » by wildvikeswolves » Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:46 am

IAmTheTruth wrote:I easily do this trade. Wall is a better prospect and player than Ricky in every single way imaginable. If Derrick Favors, who has incredibly high bust potential, is all it takes then I jump on this trade in half a second and laugh at whoever accepts.


you think wall is a better passer and has better vision then rubio???
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#16 » by IAmTheTruth » Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:21 am

wildvikeswolves wrote:
IAmTheTruth wrote:I easily do this trade. Wall is a better prospect and player than Ricky in every single way imaginable. If Derrick Favors, who has incredibly high bust potential, is all it takes then I jump on this trade in half a second and laugh at whoever accepts.


you think wall is a better passer and has better vision then rubio???



Wall's passing and vision is amazing. You're really splitting hairs between them in that aspect. Wall has FAR superior athleticism and will be a much more prolific offensive force in the NBA. He's quicker, appears stronger, and projects to play better Defense because of that. I'm not knocking Ricky, but he is not John Wall as a talent.
Don't ban me
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,348
And1: 12,210
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#17 » by Worm Guts » Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:51 pm

I haven't seen enough of these guys to have a strong opinion, but I'd lean towards no. Wall has been kind of sloppy with ball in conference play and has started to play more like a combo guard.
User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#18 » by mandurugo » Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:42 pm

I would keep Rubio and the #3. Normally I want to be on the side of the trade that is getting the best asset rather than the most assets, but it's too difficult to predict how good all these players are going to be. Perhaps I'm influenced by Derrick Rose's impact - it wasn't quite as dramatic as I expected. Is Wall better than Rose - if so, how much better? When there is this much potential involved it becomes a trade scenario that is only obvious in hindsight.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#19 » by moss_is_1 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:48 pm

IAmTheTruth wrote:
wildvikeswolves wrote:
IAmTheTruth wrote:I easily do this trade. Wall is a better prospect and player than Ricky in every single way imaginable. If Derrick Favors, who has incredibly high bust potential, is all it takes then I jump on this trade in half a second and laugh at whoever accepts.


you think wall is a better passer and has better vision then rubio???



Wall's passing and vision is amazing. You're really splitting hairs between them in that aspect. Wall has FAR superior athleticism and will be a much more prolific offensive force in the NBA. He's quicker, appears stronger, and projects to play better Defense because of that. I'm not knocking Ricky, but he is not John Wall as a talent.

Wall isn't the passer Rubio is. Rubio has some of the best court vision, passing skills, and BBIQ in a point guard in quite awhile. That's why he's so good, he doesn't have elite athleticism to overcome just average things. Plus he's taller than Wall, who only seems to be about 6'3 at the most while Rubio could be 6'5.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: #3 + Rubio for #1 

Post#20 » by shrink » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:12 pm

I think the front office would do this trade. They need to do whatever they can to create marketing opportunities and lure back fans.

Starting with the NCAA tournament, and many many office pools, then ational media will be following John Wall.

Any story leading up to the lottery will talk about John Wall.

Any story after the lottery will talk about John Wall.

Workouts? John Wall.

Draft John Wall.

Pre-season? Rookie reports? John Wall. John Wall.

The front office would be hard-pressed to find a better opportunity to get national exposure, and get casual fans interested than to add the #1 pick. Rubio and #3 may turn out to be worth more on the court, but I think Wall would be their choice.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves