New England v. Ravens (satan about to win again)

Post #1 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 2:48 am

I figure we can use the excitement of a game thread until the Pats finally go down with a loss.....I'd like to see the Ravens stick one on Brady.

Post #2 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 3:06 am

10-10.

Ray Lewis, Willis McGahee and Ed Reed playing with heavy hearts tonight, I'm sure.

Post #3 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 3:11 am

You have to play a perfect game to beat the Pats.....that fumble on the INT return was a killer. That would have likely meant at least a Raven's FG......

Thunder Muscle · Post #4 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 3:17 am

I was never a big Brady fan by any means, but this guy is becoming one of the worst whiners in the league. The guy complains every play that doesn't result in something positive...

I agree, that fumble on the INT was a killer. Hope Baltimore pulls this baby out.

NeedsMoreCheese · Post #5 » by **NeedsMoreCheese** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 3:26 am

N8Frog wrote:I was never a big Brady fan by any means, but this guy is becoming one of the worst whiners in the league. The guy complains every play that doesn't result in something positive...

I agree, that fumble on the INT was a killer. Hope Baltimore pulls this baby out.

Tim Duncan and Tom Brady are the same guy.

As for the INT fumble part, well thats why you dont buy Leon Letts football instructional videos.

Post #6 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 3:58 am

It's getting close....gotta love having Don Shula in the booth......It's almost like God cheering against Satan....

Post #7 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:00 am

God dammit.

TheGhostDog · Post #8 » by **TheGhostDog** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:04 am

Did they ask Shula about his asterisk comments regarding NE cheating? If so what did he answer?

Post #9 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:06 am

They asked him and you could tell he's trying to distance himself form that comment as much as possible. He said that he and his teammates would give all the credit in the world if the Pats did it, or something to that effect.

Post #10 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:18 am

A long, time consuming drive for a TD and this game should be over.

Post #11 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:24 am

Worst thing the Ravens could do would be to go soft and stop bringing pressure.

So of course they rush three :banghead:

goirish2107 · Post #12 » by **goirish2107** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:25 am

whats the timeout situation?

crkone · Post #13 » by **crkone** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:25 am

Whoever took the points... :nonono:

crkone · Post #14 » by **crkone** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:26 am

Prevent defense....

Preventing winning ever since 4 and 26.

Post #15 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:30 am

Amazing. Two consecutive plays Baltimore would have stopped them. If they get it now...

Post #16 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:31 am

****.

I can't believe this. They had them stopped twice.

Post #17 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:33 am

4th and 5. This is it!

El Duderino · Post #18 » by **El Duderino** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:33 am

It's like the Packers game

Everytime they don't blitz the Pats get a good play

MikeIsGood · Post #19 » by **MikeIsGood** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:34 am

If I can get a sack, forced fumble, recovery, and touchdown on this last play I might be able to make my Fantasy league's playoffs :lol:

I've only caught the 4th Q of this game but it's been great.

MikeIsGood · Post #20 » by **MikeIsGood** » Tue Dec 4, 2007 4:36 am

Goddamnit.