The Milwauke Bucks, one of the great Mysteries of the league

Post #121 » by **blkout** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Dwight went 24/16 and 19/10 against Avi Lee this season. Only blocked 2 shots total. Obviously Bogut was expected to do well against Lee but some Knick fans are acting like everyone puts up 20/20/5 on him.

David Lee's total blocks for the season: 24
Bogut's last six games: 23 :lol:

Great game from Bogut, doesn't matter who the opponent was.

icat2000 · Post #122 » by **icat2000** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:56 pm

Ito wrote:
GayFish wrote:
Ito wrote:no doubt that Bogut is a great center who's really underrated.. but you guys are overrating his performance last night. It was against the KNICKS! against a 6'8 LEE.. Our tallest player is Gallo!! smh

Yeah because people drop 20/20/5 blks all the time!

oh but against Lee it happens all the time. Maybe not 20/20 but Lee is the double double machine.. in the sense that he's going to give you a double double but also give up a double double.

Wow. didn't realise he was THAT bad. What does he bring to the Knicks? If he going to give up all the points he scores in defense. Why bother. :lol:

Vindicater · Post #123 » by **Vindicater** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:15 pm

Bogut should make the 3rd team all-NBA team this year.

BUt he wont unless the bucks make te playoffs

pross · Post #124 » by **pross** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:49 pm

Why so much hate from NY fans?

20/20/5 is massive no matter what team you play.

paul · Post #125 » by **paul** » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:20 pm

Not to be picky, but it was actually 24/20/5

Guy986 · Post #126 » by **Guy986** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:57 pm

Umm, the Bucks are legit.....?

Baddy Chuck · Post #127 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:14 pm

Guy986 wrote:Umm, the Bucks are legit.....?

Miami w/o Wade.

Better? Yes. Legit? We'll see.

AussieBuck · Post #128 » by **AussieBuck** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:18 pm

Our D has been mad since we shifted Warrick off onto the Bulls.

Gus McCrae · Post #129 » by **Gus McCrae** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:21 pm

paul wrote:
U-Borat wrote:Jennings and Bogut are HUGELY underrated.
Bogut i would put as the 3rd best center in the league behind Yao and Howard. Yes, i'm a lakers fan and i would trade bynum for bogut straight up with no hesitation.

First time I've ever seen a Laker fan say that.

well allow me to provide the second

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #130 » by **Buck You** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:23 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Guy986 wrote:Umm, the Bucks are legit.....?

Miami w/o Wade.

Better? Yes. Legit? We'll see.

We killed the Heat 2 straight games earlier this season with Wade playing.

Dupp · Post #131 » by **Dupp** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:38 pm

Guy986 wrote:Their best player is an Australian.
Their starting PG shoots 3/14 from the field every game.
They are starting a Small Forward at the 4.
Carlos Delfino and Charile Bell are their starting wing.

You look at their roster and you think, How are they winning all these games? How are they even respectable? On paper, they look like they have the worst talent in the entire league. You think the Houston Rockets are devoid of talent? If you combine the two teams, this is what the starting lineup would look like.

Aaron Brooks
Trevor Ariza (Martin should start here but lets not count him yet)
Shane Battier
Luis Scola
Andrew Boguts

This is how bad the Milwaukee Bucks are. Only one guy from their team would start on the Rockets. (Altho he would probably be the best player from the 2 teams)

I've seen alot of their games and they're actually quite fun to watch. They hustle, they move the ball well, they rebound, they defend and most importantly they play as a unit. The Bucks really only have 2 good defensive players. They defend better than you'd imagine considering how many liabilities they have out there. The Bucks shouldn't be this good. They're way waaaaaaay overachieving.

I present to you, the Coach of the Year.

theres your answer. you cant beat that

Vindicater · Post #132 » by **Vindicater** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:54 pm

So where will Bogt end up in the ALL-NBA teams then?

2nd team? 3rd team? no team?

Dr Positivity · Post #133 » by **Dr Positivity** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:58 pm

No Milwaukee!!! Don't take our 5th seed! We want Boston!

wicked_crossova · Post #134 » by **wicked_crossova** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:02 am

Big deal, theyve beaten crappy teams they should beat (they are 9-20 against teams above .500). They are right where i thought they would be, around the lower end of the east playoff picture. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

ponder276 · Post #135 » by **ponder276** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:12 am

Skiles is doing a great job, and Bogut is a very good 2-way player, underrated by most fans. They are definitely EXTREMELY low on talent, on pretty much every other team in the NBA Bogut and Salmons are the only guys who could start, and they've only had Salmons for 6 games. Jennings, Delfino, Mbah a Moute, Bell, etc. are mediocre bench players.

Dobber-16 · Post #136 » by **Dobber-16** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:18 am

wicked_crossova wrote:Big deal, theyve beaten crappy teams they should beat (they are 9-20 against teams above .500). They are right where i thought they would be, around the lower end of the east playoff picture. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Isn't that what good teams do, beat crappy teams?

Edit: Didn't the Celts just got a beating at home by one of the worst teams in recent years?

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #137 » by **Buck You** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:19 am

wicked_crossova wrote:Big deal, theyve beaten crappy teams they should beat (they are 9-20 against teams above .500). They are right where i thought they would be, around the lower end of the east playoff picture. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

You don't represent the majority of people that thought that the Bucks would win 25 games.

mbucks22 · Post #138 » by **mbucks22** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:20 am

wicked_crossova wrote:Big deal, theyve beaten crappy teams they should beat (they are 9-20 against teams above .500). They are right where i thought they would be, around the lower end of the east playoff picture. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

The amount of ignorance you display is lulzy.

wicked_crossova · Post #139 » by **wicked_crossova** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:22 am

Dobber-16 wrote:
wicked_crossova wrote:Big deal, theyve beaten crappy teams they should beat (they are 9-20 against teams above .500). They are right where i thought they would be, around the lower end of the east playoff picture. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Isn't that what good teams do, beat crappy teams?

Yep, but they're not anything more then a "good/average" team.

The amount of ignorance you display is lulzy.

cool story bro.

mbucks22 · Post #140 » by **mbucks22** » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:23 am

Ah the "cool story bro" response. The best sign of defeat.