If were 95% healthy, we can go back to Dallas and win!
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
If were 95% healthy, we can go back to Dallas and win!
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 43
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 01, 2007
If were 95% healthy, we can go back to Dallas and win!
I was watching the game over the other day on my tiVo and saw so many things that could have been avoided in situations... Woodson would have made a huge difference...
As long as we stay healthy, we can beat Dallas... That team doesnt scare me at all!
As long as we stay healthy, we can beat Dallas... That team doesnt scare me at all!
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 107,791
- And1: 42,082
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
There isn't a team in the NFL that really scares me. Even the Patriots, with their aging defense and suspect offensive line, look like that could be beaten.
Dallas, to be honest though, may actually be the most well-rounded team in the NFL. If we meet again in the NFC championship it's going to take the Packers playing there best in order to come out of their with a win.
Dallas, to be honest though, may actually be the most well-rounded team in the NFL. If we meet again in the NFC championship it's going to take the Packers playing there best in order to come out of their with a win.
- Nowak008
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,588
- And1: 4,303
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Book Publisher
- Contact:
DrugBust wrote:There isn't a team in the NFL that really scares me. Even the Patriots, with their aging defense and suspect offensive line, look like that could be beaten.
Dallas, to be honest though, may actually be the most well-rounded team in the NFL. If we meet again in the NFC championship it's going to take the Packers playing their best in order to come out of their with a win.
He is really scary.


John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
- brewcityboii
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,128
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 28, 2007
- Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,725
- And1: 8,134
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
I think going to Dallas, even when healthy in a playoff atmosphere would be incredibly tough, especially with a young team. That is why it is so important to take care of business now and hopefully we wont have to go back there. DET, PHI, CAR, and WAS are there remaining games so it would appear there is still a glimmer of hope for home field, but we would have to win out to even have a chance.
Do it for Chuck
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 43
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 01, 2007
bigrich88 wrote:KGB and Woodson will make a huge difference in the rematch in the NFC chanpionship and I'm confident we can come out with the win as long as Brett Favre does not try to force anything like he did against them the first time.
I agree, i think this team learns very quicky and makes ajustments very well. If we have everyone and the experience from this last game we can go in there even stronger and come away with a win..
It feels like those past years when dallas would get in our way until we finally beat them..
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
xTitan wrote:Jason Garrett>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bob Sanders
Sanders and his vanilla defense and poor personnel decisions will come back to haunt this team.
I agree unless KGB can consistently beat Adams. The only chance we have to slow the Dallas offense is to get pressure on Romo to disrupt their passing game. If KGB can't help change the feeble pass rush we got last time and we sit back letting Romo scan the field until someone gets open, they are going to drop 30+ points on us again and likely we'll create no turnovers barring a fumble or a tipped pass that gets picked.
Romo is a very accurate passer, give him all day to throw, it's hard for me to envision him not picking our secondary apart yet again.