ImageImageImage

The Al Jefferson trade thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,730
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: The Al Jefferson trade thread 

Post#101 » by jpatrick » Mon Mar 8, 2010 4:50 pm

Slum_Dillinger wrote:
horaceworthy wrote:This deal goes along the same lines as the one I proposed, young talent + expiring. I'd rather have Rudy/Gibson/picks than Gallo, but If I recall correctly, you've been big on Gallo since his draft year. I just think The Situation should stay in New York, and I'm not sure the Pringles Guy would push for Walsh to add Al, since he prefers to pick up the pace.


There is so much awesome in this post I don't even know where to begin. :lol:


HIlarious. :lol:
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: The Al Jefferson trade thread 

Post#102 » by skorff26 » Mon Mar 8, 2010 5:20 pm

If Jefferson has such horrible value now (Gibson/Fernandez or Deng), we should definitely not trade him. His value is super-low, let him get his knee and the rest of his body back to 100% (coming off an injury like that, your knee isn't the only thing that isn't game ready) and let him have a much better season next year.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: The Al Jefferson trade thread 

Post#103 » by Krapinsky » Mon Mar 8, 2010 5:34 pm

skorff26 wrote:If Jefferson has such horrible value now (Gibson/Fernandez or Deng), we should definitely not trade him. His value is super-low, let him get his knee and the rest of his body back to 100% (coming off an injury like that, your knee isn't the only thing that isn't game ready) and let him have a much better season next year.


Exactly. Such a trade would all but guarantee us to be bottome feeders in the West for years to come. I don't have the patience for three more years of crapsketball. I would probably lose interest in the team at that point. Trading Jefferson for Gibson and Fernandez puts us in Nets territory next year.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: The Al Jefferson trade thread 

Post#104 » by horaceworthy » Tue Mar 9, 2010 12:15 am

skorff26 wrote:If Jefferson has such horrible value now (Gibson/Fernandez or Deng), we should definitely not trade him. His value is super-low, let him get his knee and the rest of his body back to 100% (coming off an injury like that, your knee isn't the only thing that isn't game ready) and let him have a much better season next year.

I've been saying that for awhile now. His play this year, combined with the injury, and the depth at PF available in FA/the draft this year, make it so the market for Jefferson likely won't be booming. The problem is the presence of Love, Pekovic apparently ready to cross the Atlantic, and multiple picks in a strong PF draft may contribute to Kahn wanting to pull the trigger on a Big Al trade this summer rather than wait. Gibson/Fernandez/picks/flexibility was proposed under the premise that, for whatever reason, Kahn's set on dealing Jefferson this summer. My hope is that Jefferson either finishes the year on a strong note, or is given enough time to show the new FO what he's capable of at full strength, but I'm not sure on what the chances of either are.
Krapinsky wrote:Exactly. Such a trade would all but guarantee us to be bottome feeders in the West for years to come. I don't have the patience for three more years of crapsketball. I would probably lose interest in the team at that point. Trading Jefferson for Gibson and Fernandez puts us in Nets territory next year.

One could easily say that we'll be bottom feeders for years to come if we don't do something about our interior D and outside shooting (and many have said the same about us if we keep the Alvin JefferLove frontcourt together). How good we are next year will have a lot to do with Pekovic, how our draft class performs and the old McHale-ism "improvement from within," primarily from Love, Flynn, Brewer and possibly Jefferson (and Ellington/Hollins/Sessions/Darko?). If Gibson/Fernandez is the end game, then yes, we remain a bad team, but that's not what was proposed. Gibson/Fernandez/etc. just gives us two young players that have played well for playoff teams and possess attributes we could use, added draft/salary flexibility, and keeps our options open to make a significant move in FA or trade either this year or the next.

Plus, it opens up the possibility of Love initiating the break, and Rubio running it with Brewer and Fernandez on the wings. I think Derek Fisher just crapped his adult diaper.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Al Jefferson trade thread 

Post#105 » by shrink » Tue Mar 9, 2010 3:56 am

I hope tonight's 36 PTS, 13 RB will remind fans from other teams what Al is capable of.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: The Al Jefferson trade thread 

Post#106 » by moss_is_1 » Tue Mar 9, 2010 4:05 am

shrink wrote:I hope tonight's 36 PTS, 13 RB will remind fans from other teams what Al is capable of.

I'm wanting to trade him, but that's just because I like Love more. But I really don't want to get rid of either of them....Hopefully we'll find a center who can play with them, and they'll keep working on their defense so they can play more together.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves