Clangus wrote:Ok im going to start at the bottom and work my way up.
Drafting Harden was the right choice. Tyreke would have stunk it up on the Thunder. He can't shoot, Harden can. Put Harden in Reke's situation where he gets to be the #1 option and he might have put up good numbers.
What kind of arguement is that? Harden is giving the reigns to do what he can do. Tyreke's just the better player, plain and simple. Years from now, fans that say Durant/Roy over Roy/Oden would've been something will be saying the same thing. Evans is more of a ball-dominant scorer, as opposed to Durant. They would've fit beautifully. You have two of the best perimeter, young players in the league. One's thats going to be 22/5/5, one that is 30/8.
Westbrook-Evans backcourt also is one of the best defensive backcourts. Shooting is a concern, though.
Clangus wrote: Noah? Maybe, but im not enomared with him. Green is a winner. His stats are up and down, but if you watch him play every game you will see he makes alot of winning basketball plays. I am still happy with that pick.
Don't be enamored with him, it's fine. He's ugly as ****, but he's a 6 foot 11 agile PF/C that averages a double double in barely 31mpg. He's the answer to a tremendous interior defense, and pick and roll defense. He has the length, athleticism, and size to be a heck of a defender, you're talking about someone that can come out on picks, that can contest shots, etc. He'd be the perfect, young, defensive PF/C in OKC.
He'd be the team's leading rebounder, shot blocker, and improve the interior defense immenesly.
Green is a nice piece, but we all know in order to take that NEXT step in the franchise, the PF part is going to have improve.
Clangus wrote: Westbrook... We had Luke Ridnour and Earl Watson playing at the PG.... WE NEEDED AN Upgrade desperatly, Westbrook is a massive upgrade, he has the potential to be a superstar. Lopez is putting up good stats, but his team has won....7 games?! I think its a decent player putting up good stats on a bad team. I don't see him doing anything close to that on a winning team. Love, well we already had/have 4 decent pf , 2 of which are young pf prospects that look like they will become pretty goood players. (Ibaka and DJ White) no need to draft something that you are loaded at. (We picked Ibaka the same year as Westbrook, and stashed him for a year but still had Collison, Green, and a Kurt. (from memory)
Westbrook is NEVER going to be a superstar. Immeaditly get that train of thoughts out your head. In order to be a superstar, you got to show flashes year 1. Meaning taking big shots, doing big things, and exceeding expectations(i.e Tyreke evans).
Defensively and athleticism wise he's a premiere PG, but he's brick shooter, and a poor playmaker. Granted, in the draft, if you would've gotten Lopez or Love that would've been incredible. Lopez, a legit 7 foot inside presence, Love a legit double double EVERY night.
Can you imagine a Lopez/Noah/Durant front court or a Noah/Love/Durant frontcourt. Fantastic efficiency, rebounding, and defense to go along with Tyreke at the SG spot. Granted, not every pick would be the same cause of different outcomes, but with the picks Presti got he could've done better.
You'd be out at PG, but PG/Reke/Durant/Love or Noah/Lopez or Noah is SICK.
Clangus wrote: Glen Davis is an over-rated scrub. I'll admit Landry would have been nice though. But that's just refuting the picks. You can always say "they should have drafted player x instead" but whether or not he could have picked other players is irrelavant to a point, beacuse all of Presti's picks have turned out pretty good- none of them could be considered bad picks because all of them are decent players. Can every GM say that? Plenty of GM get top 5 picks and get it wrong.
Glen Davis would be a rotational piece in the OKC Thunder if he was still on the team. He's a good mid-range shooter, offensive rebounder, and pretty solid defender. You can hate him, but he's actually pretty solid. In a championship caliber team, he's a rotational piece.
Carl Landry? Now he's just evidence on how a great GM(Morey) rapes another GM(Presti).
Clangus wrote: But IMO the reason he is considered good is because of the combined body of work he has put together - he has drafted well, traded well (mostly) and has a bucket load of cap room, talent, and draft picks to show for it, not to mention a playoff team. he has put the thunde in a good position financially to resign KD RW and the rest of our good young players in the next few years. Do you realize that OKC will have enough cash for a MAx player this off season? (or dam close to it) - they did this WHILE MAKING THE PLAYOFFS! He also cleared house, we had a bunch of losers and guys that don't play d and weren't winning - Ray, Rashard, Ridnour, Watson, Wilkins, Saer Sene, Robert Swift, Johan Petro, Kurt Thomas(hes ok but old) Wally Szerbiak, etc etc to turn that group into one of the best cores in the NBA AND collect a handful of picks and a **** load of cap space takes a genius GM. Sometimes it pays to look a little deeper that just who a guy drafted.
He's a good GM cause he's patient. Other GMs be bad and continue to be bad, or be bad and trade up to be good. He's had the fortune to have a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th overall pick in the last 3 drafts. It's not like he did something to earn that.
The best thing he's done is not accept bad contracts, but that's obvious cause he has 4 youngsters he needs to play, so the benefit of taking someone more ready-now does what besides negate their playing time.
Clangus wrote: Sam Presti is a really good GM. I can't think of another guy i would want running things instead.
Daryl Morey. The best GM in the league.