ImageImageImageImageImage

Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment

Moderator: JaysRule15

Alfred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,350
And1: 20,853
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
 

Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#1 » by Alfred » Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:01 am

Huge news coming down the pipe:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/w ... ?eref=sihp

Article wrote:As with most issues of competitive balance, floating realignment involves finding a work-around to the Boston-New York axis of power in the AL East. In the 15 seasons during which the wild-card system has been in use, the Red Sox and Yankees have accounted for 38 percent of all AL postseason berths. The league has never conducted playoffs without the Red Sox or Yankees since that format began -- and in eight of those 15 years both teams made the playoffs. Since 2003 the Sox and Yankees have won at least 95 games 11 times in 14 combined seasons.

One example of floating realignment, according to one insider, would work this way: Cleveland, which is rebuilding with a reduced payroll, could opt to leave the AL Central to play in the AL East. The Indians would benefit from an unbalanced schedule that would give them a total of 18 lucrative home dates against the Yankees and Red Sox instead of their current eight. A small or mid-market contender, such as Tampa Bay or Baltimore, could move to the AL Central to get a better crack at postseason play instead of continually fighting against the mega-payrolls of New York and Boston.


This has absolutely massive implications for the Blue Jays. But I assume because it would be too good to be true, that it will never happen.
Image
FreeAgent
Junior
Posts: 256
And1: 7
Joined: Mar 06, 2010

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#2 » by FreeAgent » Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:55 am

I'd much rather have them expand the playoffs to 6 teams with 3 vs 6 and 4 v 5 best of 3. Winners face the 2 best division winners. Like football.
User avatar
Attonitus
Senior
Posts: 621
And1: 20
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
     

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#3 » by Attonitus » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:54 am

Interesting but I don't see what it does to take down the current AL power structure. I don't see the Yankees or Red Sox willing to leave their current situations because of the marketing potential of playing eachother more often and swaping the Indians and Orioles hardly does anything to create more parity. Maybe I don't understand the "floating" aspect enough. Would teams take turns being in a different division or would these be permanant switches?

I would love the Jays to find a sucker to swap with, however considering attendance increases 100% when the Yankees or Sox are in town, Jay's brass might not be as for the idea as the fans are.
User avatar
raps4life~
General Manager
Posts: 7,664
And1: 25
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Location: California
       

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#4 » by raps4life~ » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:02 pm

They should just remove the divisions and go with top 4 teams. Every team plays every team the same amount of times.
User avatar
Raptorsrock
RealGM
Posts: 15,626
And1: 33
Joined: Jul 11, 2001

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#5 » by Raptorsrock » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:38 pm

What MLB should do is....

1) Implement a salary cap

2) Shorten the regular season to 145 game or so and expand the playoffs to allow half the teams in each league to make the playoffs

You would see attendance and general overall interest in baseball skyrocket if you did these two things
"I had no idea what the word 'contraction' meant before I saw it on the Internet." - LeBron James
User avatar
raps4life~
General Manager
Posts: 7,664
And1: 25
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Location: California
       

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#6 » by raps4life~ » Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:15 pm

Raptorsrock wrote:What MLB should do is....

1) Implement a salary cap



They would NEVER do that. That would mean actually giving a chance for every team to make the playoffs.
User avatar
chargerxthirty
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,635
And1: 795
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#7 » by chargerxthirty » Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:48 pm

lol..

3 teams that probably wouldn't mind swapping with the Jays if they weren't going to be competitive.

1) Florida Marlins... there are real life MLB games that take place at Florida's home stadium where you could hear a pin drop, the attendance is THAT bad. Coming over to the AL East in a non-competitive year gets you instant gate revenue for the 20 or so home games vs the Yankees and Red Sox and also introduces the potential for a subway series... Marlins Vs Rays.

2) New York Mets... again... less likely as they are a very traditional NL market. I don't doubt that even GM's as stupid as Omar Minaya would mind having an asset like Johan Santana not having to go up the plate and bat though. Again, the opportunity for a New York/New York subway series.

3) Washington Nationals... a perennial non-contender! It's not that they can't be, it's just that they aren't. The usual suspects here... gate revenue from the Yankees and Red Sox home games that they can use to pay off Strasburg (lol!) ... not to mention a potential hometown rivalry series with the Baltimore Orioles.
User avatar
chargerxthirty
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,635
And1: 795
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#8 » by chargerxthirty » Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:51 pm

Just to quickly note...

I wouldn't be opposed to switching with one of these teams permanently if possible. The Marlins if I could. I love National League baseball... It's always exciting when a guy like Zambrano comes to the plate and smacks a dinger to put runs on the board helping to earn himself a W. Also, I know the Jays are by no means a "fast" team, but I think the small ball style in the NL would correspond with more wins for us. It's hard to win a slugging contest when the 2 highest payrolls in the game are in your division.
Peteros
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 2,294
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#9 » by Peteros » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:43 am

Raptorsrock wrote:What MLB should do is....

1) Implement a salary cap

2) Shorten the regular season to 145 game or so and expand the playoffs to allow half the teams in each league to make the playoffs

You would see attendance and general overall interest in baseball skyrocket if you did these two things


Exactly!
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,398
And1: 21,647
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#10 » by Randle McMurphy » Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:59 am

MLB is trying to create a system where Boston and New York still dominate and play each other 20 times a year, but also give the facade of competitive balance.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
CrymeTime
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,275
And1: 265
Joined: Jan 11, 2010

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#11 » by CrymeTime » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:00 pm

Imagine if one of Boston or New York was moved to the NL.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 39,398
And1: 21,647
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#12 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:36 am

CrymeTime wrote:Imagine if one of Boston or New York was moved to the NL.

Except the point of this proposed divisional adjustment is to keep them together and move everyone else around.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
User avatar
kiz5
Veteran
Posts: 2,640
And1: 304
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Mississauga
     

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#13 » by kiz5 » Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:05 am

If they put weaker teams in this division it gives MLB better marketing as the Sox and Yanka would rack up more wins and probably both win 100.
User avatar
MadFishX
Rookie
Posts: 1,053
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Location: North

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#14 » by MadFishX » Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:01 pm

no way would rogers allow the blue jays to not be in the same division as yankees and jays.

there are 2 ways of revenue in toronto for the jays

1.winning
2.yankees/ red sox games

They wouldn't sacrifice yanks/ sox games for winning. Because switching divisions wouldn't guarantee success. However, winning is possible in this division, ie: tampa bay. So I don't expect any radical adjustment anytime soon.
Image
Alfred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,350
And1: 20,853
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
 

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#15 » by Alfred » Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:45 pm

MadFishX wrote:no way would rogers allow the blue jays to not be in the same division as yankees and jays.

there are 2 ways of revenue in toronto for the jays

1.winning
2.yankees/ red sox games

They wouldn't sacrifice yanks/ sox games for winning. Because switching divisions wouldn't guarantee success. However, winning is possible in this division, ie: tampa bay. So I don't expect any radical adjustment anytime soon.


It woulde remove that one terrible excuse that Jays management comes back to every season: that we're not making the playoffs because we're in the same division as the Yankees and Red Sox.
Image
kavan
General Manager
Posts: 9,451
And1: 91
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
Location: Toronto
         

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#16 » by kavan » Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:07 pm

Tampa or Baltimore moving does us no good. We need a 6 team play off. Team with best record in the AL and NL get a by or somthing like the NFL.

We need more teams to make the playoffs this is crazy with the number of teams we have and we have the least number of teams that take part in the playoffs in the MLB.

I think unless WE move to the AL Central we aren't benefiting from this at all.

Expand Play offs and tell NY to stop spending.
Raptors, Leafs, Jays. #Toronto
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#17 » by The_Hater » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:33 pm

raps4life~ wrote:They should just remove the divisions and go with top 4 teams. Every team plays every team the same amount of times.


Unfortunately they're never going to do that. Divisions create rivalries. Rivalries create interest and interest creates revenue.

And that's why every major sport implements divisions now.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
augustine
Senior
Posts: 505
And1: 29
Joined: Oct 17, 2006

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#18 » by augustine » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:02 pm

The_Hater wrote:
raps4life~ wrote:They should just remove the divisions and go with top 4 teams. Every team plays every team the same amount of times.


Unfortunately they're never going to do that. Divisions create rivalries. Rivalries create interest and interest creates revenue.

And that's why every major sport implements divisions now.


Playoff contention would probably create more interest and revenue than a rivalry. Imagine the excitement of an extra six or seven teams genuinely being in contention in late September.
User avatar
J-Roc
RealGM
Posts: 33,149
And1: 7,550
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
       

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#19 » by J-Roc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:22 pm

This is the most convoluted, ridiculous idea I've seen from a legit source. But I'm at least happy it's being discussed. The system is broken.
User avatar
RapsGM
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,123
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2008
Location: Air Canada Centre

Re: Bud Selig, MLB considering radical division adjustment 

Post#20 » by RapsGM » Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:08 pm

MadFishX wrote:no way would rogers allow the blue jays to not be in the same division as yankees and jays.

there are 2 ways of revenue in toronto for the jays

1.winning
2.yankees/ red sox games

They wouldn't sacrifice yanks/ sox games for winning. Because switching divisions wouldn't guarantee success. However, winning is possible in this division, ie: tampa bay. So I don't expect any radical adjustment anytime soon.


+1

Return to Toronto Blue Jays