Veto? Nash for Kobe

DNYLkiller · Post #1 » by **DNYLkiller** » Tue Mar 9, 2010 3:03 am

Kobe already got moved once this year for Dwight Howard. Since i let that trade slide, do I have to let this one slide? it's roto

NetsForce · Post #2 » by **NetsForce** » Tue Mar 9, 2010 5:36 am

Honestly I don't see anything wrong with this trade. What are your reservations with it?

raptorsfan_04 · Post #3 » by **raptorsfan_04** » Tue Mar 9, 2010 7:50 am

No way this is vetoable.

retrospect24 · Post #4 » by **retrospect24** » Tue Mar 9, 2010 7:57 am

raptorsfan_04 wrote:No way this is vetoable.

DNYLkiller · Post #5 » by **DNYLkiller** » Tue Mar 9, 2010 7:50 pm

there's alot of talk that Kobe is too valuable to trade for just Nash, but it looks alot like a needs trade for both sides. I'm gonna let it go

NetsForce · Post #6 » by **NetsForce** » Tue Mar 9, 2010 8:14 pm

Nash has played poorly by his standards the last month or so but he's still an assist machine. My guess is that people are fooled by Kobe's name value.

ChronicKerr · Post #7 » by **ChronicKerr** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:32 am

If the guy trading Kobe is going for assists I see nothing wrong with it at this point in the season.

Post #8 » by **Young_Star11** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:06 am

Whilst Kobe > Nash,

Nash helps a team if they want to be elite in assists/the percentages/three-pointers.

BucksBrew · Post #9 » by **BucksBrew** » Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:17 pm

In Roto at this point in the season it's about the stats you need not about the players unless it's a keeper league

I traded Wade for Billups a month ago cause i needed Ft%

and it boosted me all the way from 9th in ft% to 3rd now i'm first in the league overall
( I also added Dirk to my team during that time too)

I see this beeing someone who needs assists giving up Kobe for the best assist guy in the league