Gathright: apparently Gathwrong

Post #1 » by **Schad** » Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:48 pm

Per Bastian, he has been released. The Jeremy Reed era can officially begin.

squeekysneakers · Post #2 » by **squeekysneakers** » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:54 pm

A tough call by AA but in the end Reed had such a good spring. It would be hard to not give him a shot. I like the move. Reed looks like a good player off the pine for us.

Relentless88 · Post #3 » by **Relentless88** » Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:10 pm

Gathwright just didn't hit well. Sure we could've used his speed, but he has to be able to get on base first.

Randle McMurphy · Post #4 » by **Randle McMurphy** » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:07 pm

Schadenfreude wrote:Per Bastian, he has been released. The Jeremy Reed era can officially begin.

Doesn't Mike McCoy have the edge for 25th man?

Hoopstarr · Post #5 » by **Hoopstarr** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:47 am

Randle McMurphy wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Per Bastian, he has been released. The Jeremy Reed era can officially begin.

Doesn't Mike McCoy have the edge for 25th man?

That's what Bastian said. Then again, I don't care.

Randle McMurphy · Post #6 » by **Randle McMurphy** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:23 am

Hoopstarr wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Per Bastian, he has been released. The Jeremy Reed era can officially begin.

Doesn't Mike McCoy have the edge for 25th man?

That's what Bastian said. Then again, I don't care.

It does actually matter to me somewhat. Jeremy Reed would be like a repeat of the bad memory that Brad Wilkerson is.

Modern_epic · Post #7 » by **Modern_epic** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:37 am

Schad, you are normally great, but I've got to say, this was an awful, awful title.

Post #8 » by **OldNo7** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:35 am

McCoy does have the inside track for the 25th roster spot because of his ability to play the IF and OF.

youngLion · Post #9 » by **youngLion** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:17 am

Modern_epic wrote:Schad, you are normally great, but I've got to say, this was an awful, awful title.

Hey now I think we've already established on this board that terrible puns are just about all this team is going to give to us this season, there certainly won't be many wins, so we may as well take what we can get.

Post #10 » by **Schad** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:56 am

Modern_epic wrote:Schad, you are normally great, but I've got to say, this was an awful, awful title.

I kid you not, I was trying to anticipate what the Jays blogs would run with. I may be terrible people, but I win.

The_Hater · Post #11 » by **The_Hater** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:49 pm

When your name is Joey Gathright and you're basically Scott Podsednik lite, you know that your MLB career is going to have a short shelf life.

Randle McMurphy · Post #12 » by **Randle McMurphy** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:33 pm

Schadenfreude wrote:
Modern_epic wrote:Schad, you are normally great, but I've got to say, this was an awful, awful title.

I kid you not, I was trying to anticipate what the Jays blogs would run with. I may be terrible people, but I win.

Anticipating Parkes headlines is nothing to be proud of. :lol:

Modern_epic · Post #13 » by **Modern_epic** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:32 pm

Schadenfreude wrote:
Modern_epic wrote:Schad, you are normally great, but I've got to say, this was an awful, awful title.

I kid you not, I was trying to anticipate what the Jays blogs would run with. I may be terrible people, but I win.

Touche, good sir, touche. (Though, to be fair, his punctuation really sells the line more)