ImageImageImage

No Technical(ity)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,756
And1: 22,334
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

No Technical(ity) 

Post#1 » by Klomp » Sun Apr 4, 2010 11:36 am

http://www.startribune.com/sports/wolve ... page=2&c=y

It pays to stay calm

Honesty is the best policy with referees, Rambis knows. That's a belief that dates to his playing days, when a referee pulled him aside during a stoppage in play. An opponent was loudly complaining that Rambis had fouled him, but there was no whistle.

"He asked me, 'Kurt, did you foul him?' I said, 'I hacked him," Rambis recalled. "He said, 'Damn,' but he appreciated the honesty."

Rambis' positive relationship has carried over to his new position as an NBA coach. He's seen plenty of calls that make him angry, but he's not prone to outbursts. And as a result, Rambis has been whistled for only four technical fouls with the Wolves, or less than half as many as NBA leaders Mike Woodson of Atlanta and Indiana's Jim O'Brien, who have 10 apiece.

"Sometimes I get angry. But my approach is to talk to the referees. Nobody likes to be yelled at, to be screamed at," Rambis said. "There are times when it's appropriate and you go and talk to the referee. After going through it as a player myself, I learned they respond better if you have a conversation about it."

That approach has rubbed off on his players. Wolves players have collected a mere eight technicals all season, or half as many as Rasheed Wallace and Dwight Howard.

And only the Knicks (10), Sixers (10) and Nets (11) have fewer technicals this season than Minnesota's even dozen.

"Funny, you wouldn't think it would be that way, would you?" said point guard Ramon Sessions, who has not been penalized this year. "We've had a lot of losses -- it's frustrating out there. But I guess we don't say a lot."

Part of it may come from the way Rambis has preached to his team not to let anything bother them on the floor.

"One of our mantras to them all season long is, 'Just keep playing.' Regardless of what happens, we want them to stay focused on playing the game," Rambis said. "We don't call a lot of fouls in practice. Guys in the beginning were always looking at us, and as coaches we said, 'Keep playing, forget about it.' So hopefully they are learning how to play through" adversity.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#2 » by southern wolf » Sun Apr 4, 2010 12:04 pm

He should be rewarded. The #1 pick seems fair.
slinky
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,332
And1: 76
Joined: Dec 13, 2006

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#3 » by slinky » Sun Apr 4, 2010 12:47 pm

Dont be greedy, the #2 would be just fine...along with Aldrich dropping to #15ish...Pekovic hanging in europe another year, and someone taking Hollins for us...but dont be greedy
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#4 » by shrink » Sun Apr 4, 2010 6:47 pm

I understand that some players and coaches try to use bad behavior as a method for motivating themselves or their team, or to try to get in another play's head. On the other hand, NBA referees have the ability to punish you for it -- and levy additional punishment for borderline plays. Recall how ex-ref Tim Donaghy used to gamble knowing some refs had it out for some (deserving) players?

I don't buy the "role model" talk, but professional athletes and coaches do have an influence on young people, and I think they should act responsibly. Immature and disrespectful behavior has no place in sports, and I think we've accepted it for too long. If you do something that would make your grandmother embarrased over you, its something that a person should be ashamed of, and shouldn't be tolerated. Alternate technicals with game suspensions. Play 4-on-5.
Cyborg21
General Manager
Posts: 8,583
And1: 368
Joined: Apr 14, 2005
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Contact:
       

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#5 » by Cyborg21 » Sun Apr 4, 2010 7:29 pm

southern wolf wrote:He should be rewarded. The #1 pick seems fair.
Image
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#6 » by john2jer » Mon Apr 5, 2010 5:13 pm

Hmm, we're forth in the league for fewest techincals behind the Knicks, Sixers, and Nets.

What do those teams all have in common?

Maybe this article ain't such a good thing.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
ritt0093
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#7 » by ritt0093 » Mon Apr 5, 2010 5:32 pm

shrink wrote:If you do something that would make your grandmother embarrased over you, its something that a person should be ashamed of, and shouldn't be tolerated. Alternate technicals with game suspensions. Play 4-on-5.


I like this approach. The one thing I can not stand with Technicals is that they don't count as personal fouls as well. Maybe I can see not having defensive 3 seconds count as a personal foul, but if you aggressivly foul a guy so much that it is a technical, it should count in your PFs tally too. This is something the Olympics does that I wish the NBA would adopt.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#8 » by john2jer » Mon Apr 5, 2010 5:34 pm

As a coach, I've intentionall drawn a techincal on myself to fire my team up. It works pretty well. Of course I know where the line is, so that I don't cross it and get tossed. I've never been tossed.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
ChazzleDazzle
Junior
Posts: 489
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 02, 2001

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#9 » by ChazzleDazzle » Mon Apr 5, 2010 5:42 pm

What about that time you asked the Ref to toss you so that Shooter would get a chance to coach. Yeah, I was watching...
funkatron101 wrote:Yes Jungle is a word.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#10 » by john2jer » Mon Apr 5, 2010 6:01 pm

ChazzleDazzle wrote:What about that time you asked the Ref to toss you so that Shooter would get a chance to coach. Yeah, I was watching...


Shooter deserved a chance. I figured it was his only hope in getting off the sauce. Plus I wanted him to make his boy proud.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#11 » by casey » Mon Apr 5, 2010 6:17 pm

ritt0093 wrote:
shrink wrote:If you do something that would make your grandmother embarrased over you, its something that a person should be ashamed of, and shouldn't be tolerated. Alternate technicals with game suspensions. Play 4-on-5.


I like this approach. The one thing I can not stand with Technicals is that they don't count as personal fouls as well. Maybe I can see not having defensive 3 seconds count as a personal foul, but if you aggressivly foul a guy so much that it is a technical, it should count in your PFs tally too. This is something the Olympics does that I wish the NBA would adopt.

The majority of the time in that situation it's called a flagrant foul. I don't think u should get a foul for arguing with the ref or things like that.
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#12 » by shrink » Mon Apr 5, 2010 6:32 pm

john2jer wrote:As a coach, I've intentionall drawn a techincal on myself to fire my team up. It works pretty well. Of course I know where the line is, so that I don't cross it and get tossed. I've never been tossed.


And it's sometimes a smart thing to do to win a game.

To me, that means there is a flaw in the rules. I think we should install rules to discourage bad behavior.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#13 » by john2jer » Mon Apr 5, 2010 6:47 pm

shrink wrote:
john2jer wrote:As a coach, I've intentionall drawn a techincal on myself to fire my team up. It works pretty well. Of course I know where the line is, so that I don't cross it and get tossed. I've never been tossed.


And it's sometimes a smart thing to do to win a game.

To me, that means there is a flaw in the rules. I think we should install rules to discourage bad behavior.


You can draw a technical without "bad behavior", though. Don't have to be a flat out jerk and call the ref names, but if you question their consistency and effort, it gets the point across, draws the technical, and pisses your players off. Or at least it does for my squad. This is my last spring with these guys, I'm gonna miss them. :-(
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#14 » by shrink » Mon Apr 5, 2010 6:55 pm

john2jer wrote:
shrink wrote:
john2jer wrote:As a coach, I've intentionall drawn a techincal on myself to fire my team up. It works pretty well. Of course I know where the line is, so that I don't cross it and get tossed. I've never been tossed.


And it's sometimes a smart thing to do to win a game.

To me, that means there is a flaw in the rules. I think we should install rules to discourage bad behavior.


You can draw a technical without "bad behavior", though. Don't have to be a flat out jerk and call the ref names, but if you question their consistency and effort, it gets the point across, draws the technical, and pisses your players off. Or at least it does for my squad. This is my last spring with these guys, I'm gonna miss them. :-(


I say that's disrespectful bad behavior.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#15 » by john2jer » Mon Apr 5, 2010 7:03 pm

Ah, suck it up. If a ref is calling a good game, then I have no complaints, even if we're losing. If he's sucking ass, not being consistent, failing at his job? Then yeah, he deserves to hear about it.

If I have a question about a call because I don't understand what he called, or I didn't have the view that he did? Then I'm respectful. I call them "sir" or "ma'am". I know many of them on a first name basis, but I still show respect. If I agree with the call and my player doesn't, then I'll correct my player, and agree with the ref.

I'm talking shoddy officiating by a hack who either has an agenda, or just doesn't care.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
Breakdown777
Veteran
Posts: 2,759
And1: 47
Joined: Sep 17, 2009
Location: MN

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#16 » by Breakdown777 » Tue Apr 6, 2010 1:23 am

I think some behaviors that result in tech's are are viewed as bad behavior such as throwing things, cursing, insulting the ref.

But some other things that deserve tech's "continually arguing, telling the ref he/she is not being consistent/doing a poor job" I don't see anything wrong with. Part of any game is arguing the rules, and arguing about what is considered fair. You can view telling the ref what you think of his performance insulting, but it doesn't always have to be. I agree that a harsher punishment could be served, but nothing too severe.
"Llevaré mi talento a Minnesota".
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#17 » by shrink » Tue Apr 6, 2010 4:15 am

Why is any argueing with the ref "part of the game?" Is argueing with the cops "part of law enforcement?" Is argueing with a judge "part of the legal process?" Argueing with a teacher "part of the education process?"

IN MLB, we see animated arguments with a coach and an umpire two inches apart, screaming at each other ... and the fans love it and cheer. In football, we have end zone dances and taunting. Everyone hopes for a fight in the NHL, and there are players on rosters specifically for that purpose. In every sport we have trash talking of other players and officials, and obscene gestures.

I think the NBA rule is that you can question a call, but you can't show up the refs, but this is something some coaches do intentionally, because the slap on the wrist is too small a cost for the chance to motivate a team. We say we don't like thugs, but teach them that its acceptable at every level. How about we set examples and recognize self-respect and respecting others?
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#18 » by C.lupus » Tue Apr 6, 2010 1:45 pm

Because that doesn't motivate the players. It provides a good role model for the players but it doesn't motivate them and that is the whole point of behaving like an idiot in the first place. Sure it would be wonderful if all professional players could be motivated solely on respect and love and peace and harmony but it doesn't work that way. It's a biochemical response. Sometimes players just need an extra push to get optimal performance just like desk jockeys sometimes need a little push to get out of their rut in the office.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,352
And1: 12,212
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#19 » by Worm Guts » Tue Apr 6, 2010 1:55 pm

I don't know if that changes shrink's point. So what if it motivates players? (and i'm not sure it does) If you make the penalties severe enough, coaches won't use it as a motivational tool, and it's worth sacrificing it as a tool to encourage better behavior.
Of course I don't think it's a big issue either way.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: No Technical(ity) 

Post#20 » by C.lupus » Tue Apr 6, 2010 2:08 pm

But it IS a motivational tool that has proven results (not 100% all the time but in certain circumstances)*. As long as it works to motivate certain players, coaches will use it or coaches will be unemployed. Good coaches use every tool available to help the team win games. Bad coaches don't and find themselves out of work. I'm sorry, I agree with shrink on a personal level and wish it wasn't so but it is.


*no I don't have any citations for that statement, just my observations.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves