Packers @ Bears Pre-Game Thread

brewcityboii · Post #1 » by **brewcityboii** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:25 pm

Beat the damn Bears by alot.

Should be easy cause there starting QB is

Notice any similarities

I am expecting a huge day from Barnett he is going to be pissed from getting snubed.

Pack 27 Bears 6

Post #2 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:32 pm

I'll probably be at this game.

brewcityboii · Post #3 » by **brewcityboii** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:50 pm

DrugBust wrote:I'll probably be at this game.

Have a great time it's always fun to go to packer bear games no matter where they are but it is even more fun when its in Soldier field and the bears suck

DMBucks22 · Post #4 » by **DMBucks22** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:04 pm

This is no time to lose to da bears. NO WAY.

BrewersGM · Post #5 » by **BrewersGM** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:14 pm

The Packers are a little angry! For many reasons and they will take it out on the Bears! I think Grant will go for 125+ on the ground and Farve will throw 3 TD's to Jennings to get the point across!

I dont see the Bears being in this game after the first quarter... We are a much better team. No trap game BS, easy win!

MadCityBucky · Post #6 » by **MadCityBucky** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:38 pm

Kyle Orton will most likely be the starter, they will give him another game to prove himself and what do they have to lose, besides draft position?

I'm predicting a Packers win, but then again, I've always predicted a Packers win.

mbucks22 · Post #7 » by **mbucks22** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:22 am

Bears will be lucky if they are in it after the first quarter. We have a running game this time, our defense is damn good (and Barnett is going to be f'ing PISSED for being snubbed and take it out on whatever scrub QB or running back they have).

Plus Favre owns Soldier Field.

Pack 31
Bears 10

Post #8 » by **MickeyDavis** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:21 am

trwi7 · Post #9 » by **trwi7** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:00 am

Great coach.

Dick head got beat up by his kids.

Now we know why Sexy Rexy is sitting out.

He's fake enjoying that.

th87 · Post #10 » by **th87** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:59 am

Just make sure that TJ Ford 11 guy doesn't make any sweeping predictions too early! :lol:

BuckPack · Post #11 » by **BuckPack** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:41 pm

CLIFF LIVINGSTON says that Cedric Benson is a FAR better back than Thomas Jones and the Chicago offense will be far better off with the former than they were with the latter.

Pack: 31
Bears: 13

MikeIsGood · Post #12 » by **MikeIsGood** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:38 pm

What are the Bears playing for? They have nothing to lose, but they also have nothing to gain. The Packers, on the other hand, are fighting for homefield throughout the playoffs. And Favre will fight. Driver will fight. Barnett and the other Pro Bowl snubs will fight.

I don't expect a close game.

BrewersGM · Post #13 » by **BrewersGM** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:50 am

MikeIsGood wrote:What are the Bears playing for? They have nothing to lose, but they also have nothing to gain. The Packers, on the other hand, are fighting for homefield throughout the playoffs. And Favre will fight. Driver will fight. Barnett and the other Pro Bowl snubs will fight.

I don't expect a close game.

Me either... I smell BLOWOUT!!!

TJ_Ford_11 · Post #14 » by **TJ_Ford_11** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:16 am

th87 wrote:Just make sure that TJ Ford 11 guy doesn't make any sweeping predictions too early!

I think my predictions for this season have been fairly accurate. I predicted a 12-4 season in the season prediction thread. I was one of only a few who predicted a winning season.

TJ_Ford_11 · Post #15 » by **TJ_Ford_11** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:32 am

I'll just making my sweeping prediction now. I don't see how it would be possible for an Orton led Bears team to beat this Packers team. So the score will be: Packers 38, Bears 10. I also predict a season ending injury for one player.

th87 · Post #16 » by **th87** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:33 am

Nah, I meant that time when you said that the game was over against the Bears in the first half.

The funniest part of that was how Luke pseudo-blamed you for the loss.

Profound23 · Post #17 » by **Profound23** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:48 pm

MikeIsGood wrote:What are the Bears playing for? They have nothing to lose, but they also have nothing to gain. The Packers, on the other hand, are fighting for homefield throughout the playoffs. And Favre will fight. Driver will fight. Barnett and the other Pro Bowl snubs will fight.

I don't expect a close game.

Neither did the Bears this time last year.

Post #18 » by **ReasonablySober** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:56 pm

Profound23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Neither did the Bears this time last year.

I considered that angle, but the situations aren't really comparable. It was the last game of the season and the Bears had nothing to play for. Home field throughout was already locked up. The Packers still have a shot to get the NFC Championship to come to Green Bay.

TJ_Ford_11 · Post #19 » by **TJ_Ford_11** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:48 pm

th87 wrote:Nah, I meant that time when you said that the game was over against the Bears in the first half.

The funniest part of that was how Luke pseudo-blamed you for the loss.

Yea, that was kinda funny. Luke was taking me so serious when I was just kiddin around. Luke is an intense and funny fan. He should have took me up on my $10 offer :wink:

Profound23 · Post #20 » by **Profound23** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:45 pm

DrugBust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I considered that angle, but the situations aren't really comparable. It was the last game of the season and the Bears had nothing to play for. Home field throughout was already locked up. The Packers still have a shot to get the NFC Championship to come to Green Bay.

Yeah I am not saying the Packers won't get up for the game, but the Bears will. However, it's a good thing we were in that situation a year ago because this team remembers what Chicago is thinking/feeling and they won't sleep on them. I expect to see a great game this Sunday by both teams no matter what. If we lose, it will be because Chicago beat us not because we overlooked them.