ImageImageImage

MIN/OKC/GSW

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#1 » by shrink » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:35 pm

This trade got some positive feedback, and I found it interesting, though I'm not a fan of Jeff Green myself.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1002401

gswhoops wrote:MIN outgoing: Al Jefferson, #16 pick
MIN incoming: Anthony Randolph, Jeff Green, $6.5 mil cap space


Minnesota adds two athletic young forwards and adds about $6.5M to their cap space this summer - giving them enough to make a max offer. Draft Evan Turner #2, Paul George #24

Darko/Pekovic
Love/Randolph
Green/Brewer/George
Turner/Ellington
Flynn/Sessions/(Rubio)

OKC outgoing: Jeff Green
OKC incoming: Andris Biedrins


OKC lands a young center who can give them an anchor in the middle. Biedrins is an excellent rebounder and a quality interior defender, is young, and signed to a reasonable contract (all assuming he returns to form). OKC would be gambling on his health, but it gives them a potentially much better fit. They would still have roughly $10M in cap space to play with as well. Draft Daniel Orton #21, Quincy Pondexter #22

Biedrins/Krstic/Orton
Ibaka/Collison
Durant/Pondexter
Sefalosha/Harden
Westbrook/Maynor

GSW outgoing: Andris Biedrins, Anthony Randolph
GSW incoming: Al Jefferson, #16


The Warriors get a long coveted low post scorer and rebounder who can play C. Assuming they are in a position to draft Favors (who would be an excellent compliment to AL Jeff), AR may be more expendable then most GS fans would care to admit. Draft Derrick Favors #4, Eric Bledsoe #16

Jefferson/Turiaf/Hunter
Favors/Wright/Tolliver
Maggette/Azubuike
Ellis/Morrow/Williams
Curry/Bledsoe
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#2 » by Krapinsky » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:37 pm

Where do I sign?
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Blue Wolf
Junior
Posts: 318
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2006

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#3 » by Blue Wolf » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:55 pm

Yes ... I'm not a big Jeff Green fan either but at least he'd be an easily-moved asset
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#4 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:56 pm

I'd do it if Rambis would commit to a Green/Randolph/Love front line, but he'd probably put Green at PF or make Love the 6th man or something I wouldn't like.
Image
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#5 » by C.lupus » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:58 pm

I don't hate it but it doesn't thrill me. Not really a fan of Green on this team. Any way we could tweak it to get GSW's pick instead of Randolph? Something based on Jefferson and Green to GSW, Beans to OKC, and GS pick to MIN? Jefferson and Randolph could look very nice together.
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#6 » by funkatron101 » Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:23 pm

I like it.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,887
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#7 » by karch34 » Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:31 pm

I like it, I don't think it's the greatest deal. Probably because I'm not a high on Randolph as others (think Green is better than what we have at SF, for what that's worth). I like the extra cap room and filling holes part a lot.
allweneedisLOVE
Banned User
Posts: 2,742
And1: 27
Joined: Dec 06, 2009

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#8 » by allweneedisLOVE » Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:26 pm

Love it
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,954
And1: 1,204
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#9 » by jscott » Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:30 pm

I'm okay with it but I'd like to see who is there at 16..
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#10 » by shangrila » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:47 am

I like it. Green's versatility would be a nice fit in the triangle as would Randolph's I guess and both could fit in well with a running team. Like the others I'd probably want a fair idea of who would be available with that 16 pick as there's always a chance someone good can fall, but judging from comments from the front office this is the type of move they'd do; one that keeps cap flexibility while adding players that are athletic, fit into a running team and can have both an impact now and potential to improve in the future.
darthkiller
Banned User
Posts: 2,201
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 06, 2008

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#11 » by darthkiller » Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:53 am

didnt know today was april 1st.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#12 » by horaceworthy » Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:17 am

C.lupus wrote:I don't hate it but it doesn't thrill me. Not really a fan of Green on this team. Any way we could tweak it to get GSW's pick instead of Randolph? Something based on Jefferson and Green to GSW, Beans to OKC, and GS pick to MIN? Jefferson and Randolph could look very nice together.

Yeah, I'd be more interested in GSW's pick as well. Change Randolph to that and Green to Ibaka and I'd be down. Unfortunately, GSW giving up their pick seems unlikely.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#13 » by southern wolf » Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:15 am

I see the value for us, but I'm not a big fan of Green or Randolph. I don't think OKC would accept either.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,742
And1: 2,567
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#14 » by younggunsmn » Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:07 am

No way OKC entertains this. Biedrins makes too much, Green is more valuable to them, large part of their team chemistry and success this year.

I think there will be a good wing available at 16, I'd rather take that player than have to pay green next year.

GSW are getting too much value. Al=Biedrins+Randolph. Biedrins value has fallen off of a cliff after this season.
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#15 » by TrentTuckerForever » Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:33 pm

younggunsmn wrote:Green is more valuable to them, large part of their team chemistry and success this year.


Agreed. Green is playing the Pippen role next to Durant, or will grow into it as time passes. Chemistry and defense are a huge part of OKC's success this year.

I think they'll see after their playoff appearance the need to add a Biendris-type player, but not at the cost of Green.

For the Wolves - I love the idea of pairing young, athletic forwards with Darko and Love. Add a real perimeter threat in Turner, and that's a winning combination.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#16 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:40 pm

I DISagree!!!!

They need a bigger longer PF than Green and his poor 3 point shot this year negates the potential advantage of having a guy like him at the 4. Only reason to keep him is if they project Durant as a full time PF in the near future. Otherwise they shouldn't trade him just to trade him, but they should be on the lookout for an upgrade and IMO this is the year to do it with this draft having nice PF options for them. If I'm OKC I see about getting into the top 11 or 12 w/ Green + their own pick. And he's too stiff to play a Pippen role, Pippen was uniquely agile for his size/length. (hawt)
Image
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#17 » by SO_MONEY » Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:07 pm

Yes please!!!
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#18 » by old rem » Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:23 am

younggunsmn wrote:No way OKC entertains this. Biedrins makes too much, Green is more valuable to them, large part of their team chemistry and success this year.

I think there will be a good wing available at 16, I'd rather take that player than have to pay green next year.

GSW are getting too much value. Al=Biedrins+Randolph. Biedrins value has fallen off of a cliff after this season.


Well....GSW would not consider this. At best, Al Jeff is a PF who scores + Boards inside and does not run all that well,defend or pass. Biedrins (23) and Randolph(19) have a DECADE of future providing rebounding,defense,and good mobility. were GSW inclined to do a slower half court style, or were GSW short on shooters and scorers.....they ALMOST would do this...but then....Biedrins + AR have their original knees and GSW will be wary of trading for any high $ guy with a history of knee problems. They had to play with half a team as it was.

Biedrins' injury certainly resulted in a poor year, but that's been repaired. GSW has NEED for REBOUNDS and D...and Biedrins does both very well with a good contract and a bright future. He's actually younger than our D league rookies. Were Al Jeff the complete player we'd need....the Wolves would not trade him.

Trading within the West, GSW has to look at what teams can be dangerous competition in 2014 when our youth is ripe and the usual contenders are old or already in rebuild. OKC and Portland,are scary. The Wolves can be...but really need more DEFENSE. Biedrins and or Randolph gives the Wolves too much upgrade on D,too much added mobility. Likewise,we would be damn fools to send Biedrins to OKC . We'd be nuts to hook up Portland with a young PG or a healthy C. We'd be nuts to help the Spurs or Suns get younger.

For GSW the main deal is to add some MORE defense+Reb to the mix. We've been scoring plenty using just half the rotation. Without Biedrins and AR, however,We've had games of -15,-25 rebounds or gave up big points to average big men. What GSW needs is pretty obvious.
CENSORED... No comment.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#19 » by Devilzsidewalk » Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:06 pm

when exactly is Biedrins going to start providing this supposed defensive presence
Image
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,056
And1: 3,613
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: MIN/OKC/GSW 

Post#20 » by Foye » Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:21 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:when exactly is Biedrins going to start providing this supposed defensive presence


This. :hoop:

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves