OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,577
- And1: 18,062
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
The umpire doesn't care if it's the 94th inning...he isn't giving the **** corner.

**** your asterisk.
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
- Geddy
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 69,890
- And1: 78,609
- Joined: Nov 30, 2005
- Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
-
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
1 run on 15 hits for the cards.
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,098
- And1: 3,629
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
rkid wrote:It says Reyes is 0 for 8. If the Jays had a game like this that's the type of line Overbay would have, probably 6 of them would be strikeouts.

galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
- zilby
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,124
- And1: 38,873
- Joined: Jul 13, 2008
- Location: Shambles Travel Co./#TeamPineapple Head Office
-
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
It's over after 20. Mets win 2-1.

Hawaiian pizza is good.
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,398
- And1: 21,647
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: OT: Cards and Mets scoreless through 18 innings...
Schadenfreude wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Why did TLR call for a H&R with Pujols at the plate?
And why did he take Lopez out for Mather? Did Lopez pitch too well in the role for Tony?
Because using a reliever (even if that reliever is a middle infielder) for two innings scares Tony. Hell, letting them face two batters makes him antsy.
You didn't explain the H&R.
Keith Law couldn't understand it either:
keithlaw
Oh. My. God. Has La Russa ever seen Albert Pujols play before?
keithlaw
This game should be over, and the fact that it's not is directly on La Russa.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,577
- And1: 18,062
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
That's because I can't explain the H&R. There's no logic under the sun that can defend that.

**** your asterisk.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
- northernpuppy
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,997
- And1: 494
- Joined: Jan 29, 2005
- Location: TOR/WSR/OTT
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
Schadenfreude wrote:That's because I can't explain the H&R. There's no logic under the sun that can defend that.
I didn't see it, but the stolen base attempt that was called out was clearly safe. Castillo tagged (#47) way after his leg reached the bag. Then Pujols jacks a double which would have arguably scored him...Very dubious call.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,577
- And1: 18,062
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
northernpuppy wrote:Schadenfreude wrote:That's because I can't explain the H&R. There's no logic under the sun that can defend that.
I didn't see it, but the stolen base attempt that was called out was clearly safe. Castillo tagged (#47) way after his leg reached the bag. Then Pujols jacks a double which would have arguably scored him...Very dubious call.
I don't think he was clearly safe...they showed several replays and the call could have gone either way. But you don't send a guy with 16 career stolen bases (in over 500 games) with Pujols at the plate in that situation; that the play was even close is a miracle.

**** your asterisk.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
- zilby
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,124
- And1: 38,873
- Joined: Jul 13, 2008
- Location: Shambles Travel Co./#TeamPineapple Head Office
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
Alfred wrote:Is 18 innings of scoreless baseball a record?
I think so.
I remember watching an 18 inning game between the Braves and Astros that resulted in a walk-off homer in the bottom of the 18th.

Hawaiian pizza is good.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,275
- And1: 265
- Joined: Jan 11, 2010
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
Just curious, was there any bullpen pitchers not used? also, did any starters get into the game?
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,303
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 05, 2009
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
Crazy game. I was watching it before dinner and then 6 hours later, when I was getting ready to go to bed it was still on and Felipe Lopez was pitching.
It must be pretty demoralizing to lose a game in the 20th inning.
It must be pretty demoralizing to lose a game in the 20th inning.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,577
- And1: 18,062
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
La Russa was dumb, but words cannot express how idiotic this is:
Sign that people take the whole 'closer' thing far too **** seriously: having your closer throw 100+ pitches just so that he can be ready to get the save at some point.
The Mets and Cardinals played 20 innings that saw Tony La Russa use every position player available and a majority of his pitchers as well. He sent ten different players to the mound. While he was pulling relievers after an inning of use, Mets manager Jerry Manuel had four consecutive relievers toss at least two innings, enabling him to keep bodies in reserve.
At least in theory, because it doesn’t really matter if you keep a couple relievers back in case you do end up playing 20 innings when you have those relievers constantly warming up. See, those pitches they throw out in the bullpen actually tax their arms too, even though they don’t show up in the box score. Quoting from Anthony DiComo’s post game report,
Four Mets pitchers threw at least two innings of relief, allowing Manuel to save closer Francisco Rodriguez for a save situation. That did not occur until the 19th… Rodriguez, who had warmed up every inning from the eighth through the 19th, estimated that he threw more than 100 pitches in the bullpen. And he admitted to being somewhat gassed by the time Manuel finally called his name.
Amazing, just plain amazing. Forget the idiocy of holding your supposed best reliever back for a possible future lead for a moment and just soak in the stupidity on the part of whoever had Rodriguez up and throwing for 11 consecutive innings.
On the plus side, I think he’s stretched out now so the Mets can go ahead and get Oliver Perez out of the rotation.
Sign that people take the whole 'closer' thing far too **** seriously: having your closer throw 100+ pitches just so that he can be ready to get the save at some point.

**** your asterisk.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,285
- And1: 10,312
- Joined: Feb 21, 2006
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
LaRussa needs to have his "genius manager" label permanently removed because of his constant overmanaging. He apparently had a pitch count on Felipe Lopez. His shortstop. Managers are so overrated. Bunting with 0 out and Reyes on first. Stealing with 0 out and Pujols up. Just ridiculous.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
- There There
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,613
- And1: 201
- Joined: Dec 04, 2008
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
Schadenfreude wrote:Sign that people take the whole 'closer' thing far too **** seriously: having your closer throw 100+ pitches just so that he can be ready to get the save at some point.
heh, I noticed during extras that they were showing him warming up during many of the top half of the innings.
Funny thing is the Cards had the bases loaded a couple of times; you'd think during one of those situations he'd figure it would be a worthwhile decision bringing his closer in.
Between LaRussa and his pitch counts, and Manuel and his refusal to bring his closer in unless it was a save situation, last night was a clinic at to why micro-managing of pitching staffs has gone way too far.
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
- Geddy
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 69,890
- And1: 78,609
- Joined: Nov 30, 2005
- Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
This must have been some kind of exercise in which manager could out stupid the other manager. 

Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,285
- And1: 10,312
- Joined: Feb 21, 2006
-
Re: OT: Mets beat Cards in 20
JoePos tackles the overmanaging: http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2010/04 ... -a-series/