shrink wrote:FireNellieQuick wrote: Shrinks deal of AR, Maggs, BW for Al seems ok value to me
Just wanted to clarify that this is not my deal.
I will say that I roll my eyes when, regardless of age, injury or whatever other excuses you want to make, I see a team that loses nearly 60 games call FIVE PLAYERS "
nearly untouchable."
You don't see that in the other fanbases, and I saw no one from GSW contradict this position. With so many nearly untouchable players, maybe the trade board is the wrong place for happy posting, and you'd be happier on Player Comparisons or better yet, on the GSW board, reinforcing your own high opinions?
Nearly untouchable is ridiculous. To our FO, Curry is the only guy they'd deem off limits. Guys like Randolph, Morrow and Biedrins our fans just really like and want them to be here to succeed, so over valued by the fan base somewhat.
I see a team that loses nearly 60 games
As a GS fan that hangs out way too much on realgm, it's hard to have to try and explain what happened to GS this season each time someone says these sorts of things. GS had one of the most injury riddled seasons EVER in the history of the NBA. It got so bad that we almost played an entire quarter with 4 players in the final game of the season. Seriously, go look it up and the amount of games missed is astonishing. The D league got so much business from us they are probably looking at a major sponsorship deal with us. Part of it is due to our ridiculous coaching and medical staff, which all suck. We also had the Jax situation, which stuffed us around big time. The teams looking to be sold. Nellie, well, just can't coach for **** anymore. Over the hill is a gross UNDERSTATEMENT. All excuses, yes, but VALID reasons as to why we sucked. All of these factors all added up to one depressing year for fans and players.
This does not mean the players suck, and should be undervalued. If your not taking into account the Warriors situation when trying to make trade offers then expect to get a fierce argument back. We LOVE our players and dispise our front office and coaches. We value them more than other teams because we fully understand how dicked around they have all gotten and would be better than advertised with a better management structure in place. So when someone comes at me with "Your team only won 20 games so your players suck!", what do you expect me to say?
I think I should save this as a draft for future reference.