ElGee wrote:Hey Doc - are you going to post the results as they come in year-by-year somewhere (maybe in this thread)? Right now, in order to review the results we have to go back and find the individual yearly thread...
http://www.dolem.com/poy/
Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ
ElGee wrote:Hey Doc - are you going to post the results as they come in year-by-year somewhere (maybe in this thread)? Right now, in order to review the results we have to go back and find the individual yearly thread...
Silver Bullet wrote:ElGee wrote:Hey Doc - are you going to post the results as they come in year-by-year somewhere (maybe in this thread)? Right now, in order to review the results we have to go back and find the individual yearly thread...
http://www.dolem.com/poy/
Doctor MJ wrote:Guys keep the feedback coming on this idea. I've got concerns about people getting out of the habit of contributing, but if the consensus wants a break, we'll take a break.
drza wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Guys keep the feedback coming on this idea. I've got concerns about people getting out of the habit of contributing, but if the consensus wants a break, we'll take a break.
I can't lie, I could use more breaks and/or less overlap in this project. As it is now there are almost always 2 active threads going, and if I step away from either for a day I could easily miss 8 - 10 pages of posts (that happened with the '06 and '07 threads). I hate missing out on good convo, but I'm going to have to cut back soon. If we could at the least wait until one thread is done before starting the next, or maybe have an off day after every couple of years, it would help. There's no way I can maintain this pace for weeks nonstop, let alone months.
Quotatious wrote: Bastillon is Hakeem. Combines style and substance.
ElGee wrote:How different would the voting results look if we removed all votes for a home team's player? I look at the (close) results and can't help but think it's making a difference in a group of 23.
ElGee wrote:How different would the voting results look if we removed all votes for a home team's player? I look at the (close) results and can't help but think it's making a difference in a group of 23.
Doctor MJ wrote:Okay, we'll take a break after '99-00.
What are people's thoughts on the overlapping threads? We're doing it that way now to speed things along, thinking the quicker we get through this, the less momentum we'll lose - but if it's leading to burn out, we should consider changing it.
Silver Bullet wrote:I think home team isn't much of an issue, it's favorite players/hated players - and there's no way to know who each of the posters roots for, hates -
Sedale Threatt wrote:What about starting a new thread on the same day the previous one finishes. Monday morning to Wednesday morning, Wednesday afternoon to Friday afternoon. A nice, tight schedule, with no real overlap and no need for a break with weekends off.
semi-sentient wrote:OK, I didn't have anything to do at work today, so I banged out most of the sortable data views.
LINK: http://www.dolem.com/poy
I still have some work to do in terms of showing what each individual player has done (years that they received votes) and allowing yearly selection, but everything else works.
So that there's no question about manipulating results, the data files are located here:
Voters: http://www.dolem.com/poy/data/voters.csv
Seasons: http://www.dolem.com/poy/data/seasons.csv
Players: http://www.dolem.com/poy/data/players.csv
Results: http://www.dolem.com/poy/data/results.csv
Feedback and suggestions are welcome. I can't promise that I'll be able to fulfill every request, but I'll do what I can.
Edit: To clarify, the page is completely data driven at this point meaning that all information is coming out of the data files (with exception to point/share calculations).
Silver Bullet wrote:Doc, Would your spreadsheet be capable of putting together every voter's voting record or is that info not in there ?
semi-sentient wrote:Edit: To clarify, the page is completely data driven at this point meaning that all information is coming out of the data files (with exception to point/share calculations).