Slum_Dillinger wrote:Didnt the Wolves give Greg Buckner the chance to wear #21 and he declined out of respect? I remember reading this and being pretty upset about it.
Was it Buckner or Wilkins?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Slum_Dillinger wrote:Didnt the Wolves give Greg Buckner the chance to wear #21 and he declined out of respect? I remember reading this and being pretty upset about it.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
LONDON -- Wolves newcomer Greg Buckner has worn No. 21 previously. But when the Wolves asked him if he’d like to wear No. 21 for them, he quickly turned the offer down and opted for No. 7. Celtics newcomer forward Kevin Garnett, a 10-time NBA All-Star, wore No. 21 in Minnesota. Buckner thought it would be insulting to wear Garnett's old number in Minnesota.
"That number will be retired," Buckner said.
PeeDee wrote:Don't want him.
Strike one: Supercoolbeas
Strike two: He was supercoolrelieved when MN didn't get a top-2 pick.
Strike three: Been in supercoolrehab already.
IAmTheTruth wrote:Why do people do stuff like this? In a situation where you have 70% chance to fail, and people were dancing around like it's a lock.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves