Phil X wrote:I am Ra wrote:Magilla_Gorilla wrote:Thanks to the people who actually know what they are talking about for setting the over eager fans straight.
Except would you take advice from Forbes or RealGM posters. I don't know anything about the market but this is an easy choice here.
Forbes mustve done good research before reporting this. They are one of the more trusted groups right? They mustve thought of every possible way this isnt true and refuted it.
From what I saw, the Forbes report said he could be a shareholder in MSG. He can. He can also make money in the long run.
Look at William Shatner. He took stock instead of money for priceline and over 10 years he made 600 million dollars.
The refuting comes from people who think he could flip 100 million dollar investment and or trade on his signing.
It would have to be a long term set up, that would rely on his overall success and in addition to the success of MSG as a company. Considering MSG is more then just the Knicks.
He would have the ability to be a shareholder and grow his wealth ( with his contract) . Not dup shareholders to double his money.
Thats what I was talking about - thanks. You've got people on here who think Lebron could take half of his net worth, buy MSG stock, and double it in a matter of days. Sorry Knicks fans - but it isn't happening.