ImageImageImageImageImage

SAC / NJN / WAS

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

stock01234
Junior
Posts: 413
And1: 8
Joined: Jan 21, 2010

SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#1 » by stock01234 » Thu May 20, 2010 6:58 am

SAC
Outgoing : 5th pick, 33rd pick, Hawes
Incoming : Lopez
Why : Kings get all-star caliber center they desperately want.

NJN
Outgoing : 3rd pick, Lopez
Incoming : 1st pick (was), 33rd pick (sac), Hawes
Why : Nets get Wall, which they always wanted.

WAS
Outgoing : 1st
Incoming : 3rd pick (njn), 5th pick (sac)
Why : wiz have arenas. No one in the league would be ready to take his huge contract. So getting rid of arenas is almost impossible for wiz. Instead of adding another PG, they upgrade by drafting favors (pf) and wesley (sg)
sacking101
Senior
Posts: 641
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2007

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#2 » by sacking101 » Thu May 20, 2010 7:15 am

Kings-yes
new jersey- yes
Washington- no

With everything going on with arenas and the dissaponting year that they had i cant see them giving up a guy like wall who can turn the franchise around in. I think wall can be that good. Like you said though they will probably not get rid of arenas' contract any time soon. But hell yes i would do that is I was sacramento.
[img]/Users/ryan/Desktop/Picture%20clipping.pictClipping[/img]
10B10
Junior
Posts: 416
And1: 3
Joined: May 22, 2005

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#3 » by 10B10 » Thu May 20, 2010 7:26 am

This is an obvious no-brainer for the Kings, but I don't think either NJN or WAS would ultimately agree to it.
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#4 » by KingInExile » Thu May 20, 2010 2:19 pm

Lopez is NOT worth 2 picks and Hawes. I have no illusion that Hawes' value is more than mediocre, but he is still serviceable when used correctly. And that 5th pick could still conceivably land Cousins, who I think most agree have a lot of long term upside. So IMO this is certainly no "no-brainer" for the Kings...I think it is just a NO.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#5 » by ICMTM » Thu May 20, 2010 2:19 pm

Actually I think the 3 and 5 in this draft is better than the 1 by itself. I think trading Hawes + the 5 for Lopez is a bit steep and I think giving up the 3 and the 5 is steep, too!

I just think at 5 we will be able to get a really good player. I don't think there's a need to panic and make moves like this.
KANGZZZZZ!
User avatar
RoyalCourtJestr
Analyst
Posts: 3,146
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Location: Tyreke Evans/DeMarcus Cousins. That is all.

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#6 » by RoyalCourtJestr » Thu May 20, 2010 3:46 pm

I'd do it.
mprose wrote:And that leaves me with the conclusion that DMC is the Sarah Palin of the NBA.
10B10
Junior
Posts: 416
And1: 3
Joined: May 22, 2005

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#7 » by 10B10 » Thu May 20, 2010 6:00 pm

KingInExile wrote:Lopez is NOT worth 2 picks and Hawes. I have no illusion that Hawes' value is more than mediocre, but he is still serviceable when used correctly. And that 5th pick could still conceivably land Cousins, who I think most agree have a lot of long term upside. So IMO this is certainly no "no-brainer" for the Kings...I think it is just a NO.


Interesting. I think Lopez is certainly worth the fifth pick in this draft, but maybe I'm underrating Hawes' value a bit as a throw in. I'd pretty much do this and not turn back, but its kind of a ridiculous, unrealistic trade all around.
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#8 » by Bac2Basics » Thu May 20, 2010 8:46 pm

10B10 wrote:
KingInExile wrote:Lopez is NOT worth 2 picks and Hawes. I have no illusion that Hawes' value is more than mediocre, but he is still serviceable when used correctly. And that 5th pick could still conceivably land Cousins, who I think most agree have a lot of long term upside. So IMO this is certainly no "no-brainer" for the Kings...I think it is just a NO.


Interesting. I think Lopez is certainly worth the fifth pick in this draft, but maybe I'm underrating Hawes' value a bit as a throw in. I'd pretty much do this and not turn back, but its kind of a ridiculous, unrealistic trade all around.


Categorizing Hawes as a "throw in", is all the proof I need to know that you're clearly underrating him.

As far as the trade, as much as I'd love to have Brook Lopez in a Sacramento uniform, I don't see NJ taking anything reasonable as an acceptable offer..
Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.
~ Herman Melville
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#9 » by City of Trees » Thu May 20, 2010 11:05 pm

not a big fan of this trade. id do it if washington gives us Nick Young
Aussie 2point0
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 09, 2010

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#10 » by Aussie 2point0 » Fri May 21, 2010 11:59 am

Sorry don't mean to flame but no way in hell nets do this trade. We Lucked into Lopez cos of other gm's lack of niagra falls. Lopez has proven he should of been top 5. While I do admit Brooke has his faults, quality bigmen like him are rare as hens teeth!

Not trying to low ball or be a homer. But washington can have the 3rd pick Harris and Yi for the 1st and filler. Sorry to leave out SAC but if you can find a three way deal that includes what I've said i'd be glad to hear it.
User avatar
5th pick sucks
Veteran
Posts: 2,652
And1: 0
Joined: May 19, 2010

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#11 » by 5th pick sucks » Fri May 21, 2010 3:11 pm

kings say yes in a mille second.
TheNetsFan
Head Coach
Posts: 7,419
And1: 2,818
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
   

Re: SAC / NJN / WAS 

Post#12 » by TheNetsFan » Fri May 21, 2010 3:44 pm

I think this deal works for the Kings. Lopez is a young, proven top 5 center worthy of a top 3 pick in this draft. The success rate with 2nd rounders is very low, so you can't worry about that. Hawes is servicable but obsolete if the Kings had Lopez.

The Nets don't do it, because they wind up with 2 PGs, an ok SG & an ok center on the final year of his deal, and little else on their roster. The whole allure of Wall was to team him with Lopez.

From a basketball perspective I would do it if I were the Wizards. You're talking a likely core of Arenas, Wes Johnson, & Favors/Cousins. Talent & fit wise, that's better than Arenas+Wall. However, from a PR perspective, they need Wall to be the new alpha-dog & face of the franchise. That's why there is no way they trade #1.

Return to Sacramento Kings


cron