Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive

Moderator: Doctor MJ

drtomaslight
Ballboy
Posts: 21
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 22, 2008

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#21 » by drtomaslight » Tue May 25, 2010 1:52 am

nbhadja wrote:
drtomaslight wrote:
nbhadja wrote:
But in the 3 seasons where Kobe did not have Shaq and Gasol, he failed to make it past the first round and he even once failed to lead a team to the playoffs. To me that was the opposite of will to win. He should have been able to lead that team past the first round at least once in 3 seasons. There is no excuse for Kobe and the Lakers to lose a 7 game series against the Suns minus Amare and go 0 for 3 in chances to advance pasted the 1st round.

Not only that, but for these 3 seasons Kobe was in his prime, not some young player far away from his prime.


Thats fair to say but you have to remember who was on that team. Starting Lineup- Smuch Parker, Kobe, Lamar, Kwame Brown and Chris Mihm.

Parker, Brown and Mihm were not legit. Even MJ would have trouble with that team. Lamar now is on the bench. Kobe was basically playing with a 6th man and 3 really bad players.


Odom being on the bench now has no relation to back then. Odom was a 15-10-5 player. He was pretty decent. He did not have much talent around him asides from Odom but still that should be enough to advanced past the first round at least once in three tries. That certainly is more talent than the Suns without Amare. MJ and even Lebron would have taken that team past the first round. Prime Shaq/Hakeem etc would have as well.

But even more telling is Kobe's struggles in the finals with good teammates like Shaq, Gasol/Odom/Bynum. WHen you have a legendary center taking up double teams and dominating those double teams there is no reason to shoot 40% and below 40%.


shooting ~40% is a side effect of his game. Kobe at times is too good where he makes the rest of the his team stagnant. Then Kobe starts chucking up shots at the end of the shot clock because his teammates are just looking to him to score. Teams that reach the finals know this, so they try to double and triple team kobe. using kobe's determination as a negative, kobe then either shoots while double teamed or he passes out to teammates that just passes it back when the shot clock is low.
User avatar
RoyceDa59
RealGM
Posts: 24,276
And1: 9,179
Joined: Aug 25, 2002
         

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#22 » by RoyceDa59 » Tue May 25, 2010 1:57 am

Yeah Kobe has really stunk it up in his SIX finals appearances.

SIX.
Go Raps!!
astrallite
Starter
Posts: 2,124
And1: 13
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#23 » by astrallite » Tue May 25, 2010 2:02 am

Kobe is the greatest player of all time and transcends statistics.
nbhadja
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,964
And1: 1,148
Joined: May 22, 2010

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#24 » by nbhadja » Tue May 25, 2010 2:10 am

[/quote]

shooting ~40% is a side effect of his game. Kobe at times is too good where he makes the rest of the his team stagnant. Then Kobe starts chucking up shots at the end of the shot clock because his teammates are just looking to him to score. Teams that reach the finals know this, so they try to double and triple team kobe. using kobe's determination as a negative, kobe then either shoots while double teamed or he passes out to teammates that just passes it back when the shot clock is low.[/quote]

In Kobe's first 4 championship series he was the 2nd best player on the team. Shaq took up a double team and was much better yet Kobe still shot terrible percentages. Also in 2008/2009- Gasol/Odom/Bynum are good teammates yet Kobe still shot poorly.
KINGD
Banned User
Posts: 692
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 05, 2009

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#25 » by KINGD » Tue May 25, 2010 2:16 am

I thought he played well in 2001,2002,2009 and mediocre/bad in 2000,2008,2004. To be fair, in 2008 he was going up against the greatest defense(statistically) ever. Not sure what the point of this thread is. Everyone knows Kobe's Finals performances are a weak spot on his resume.
User avatar
Mamba Venom
RealGM
Posts: 17,979
And1: 582
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#26 » by Mamba Venom » Tue May 25, 2010 2:17 am

Kobe was the WCF MVP for those 2000-2002 teams

The East was so weak in the Finals and the East were especially weak at the C position (Rick Smits was the best center we faced) that Shaq killed.
Lakers are 22-3 in OT last 6 seasons:Kobe best OT closer!
User avatar
LascelleL
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,292
And1: 2,229
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#27 » by LascelleL » Tue May 25, 2010 2:32 am

Mamba Venom wrote:Kobe was the WCF MVP for those 2000-2002 teams

The East was so weak in the Finals and the East were especially weak at the C position (Rick Smits was the best center we faced) that Shaq killed.



Revisionist History at it's finest
RunMCR
Banned User
Posts: 4,511
And1: 5
Joined: Apr 10, 2010

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#28 » by RunMCR » Tue May 25, 2010 3:21 am

LascelleL wrote:
Mamba Venom wrote:Kobe was the WCF MVP for those 2000-2002 teams

The East was so weak in the Finals and the East were especially weak at the C position (Rick Smits was the best center we faced) that Shaq killed.



Revisionist History at it's finest


he's right though
joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#29 » by joe.linnen » Tue May 25, 2010 3:55 am

nbhadja stop being a hater, Kobe Bryant is a great player and it isn't always about numbers, its about winning.
tkb
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,759
And1: 198
Joined: Mar 19, 2005
Location: Norway
   

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#30 » by tkb » Tue May 25, 2010 4:35 am

Jimmy76 wrote:so whats makes him a better player than Isiah Thomas then?


Are you saying he isn't a better player than Isiah Thomas was?
Asianiac_24
General Manager
Posts: 8,672
And1: 4,106
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#31 » by Asianiac_24 » Tue May 25, 2010 4:43 am

Kobe for some strange reason always play well in the first three series of the playoffs, but plays a lot worse in the Finals
jym85
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,685
And1: 649
Joined: Jan 26, 2010

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#32 » by jym85 » Tue May 25, 2010 6:11 am

I'd love to see the comparison numbers for Kobe and Shaq in the last 3 to 4 minutes of the games.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,208
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#33 » by ElGee » Tue May 25, 2010 6:22 am

jym85 wrote:I'd love to see the comparison numbers for Kobe and Shaq in the last 3 to 4 minutes of the games.


2003 clutch stats from 82games:
Shaq .569% eFG% 36.3 points (per 48)
Kobe .424% eFG% 37.3 points

2004
Shaq .557% eFG% 26.6 points
Kobe .445% eFG% 47.5 points

Don't have 2000-2002.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
User avatar
supaflash
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,670
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Location: A Mile High
Contact:
   

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#34 » by supaflash » Tue May 25, 2010 6:49 am

This thread is full of so much fail.

lame poster pulling up some minimal stats trying to prove a point but probably never watched any of the games he's trying to talk about.

Of course Shaq was ridiculously dominant, no one underestimates his prime, arguably the best prime of any player ever. Yes Kobe was obviously blessed to play with him, but so has any star that has won in this league. But don't forget, Shaq couldn't win with all that Orlando talent out east, and came in to a playoff Laker team and couldn't win anything either until Kobe became dominant. And he only won once after leaving Kobe when Wade was dominant.

OP also likes to bring up the few years of Kobe by himself, what did you expect when they blew up the team and brought in new coaches etc? Are you mentally handicapped? How often do new teams just rocket to the top? How often has any 6-8 seed won a first round series? Don't forget MJ lost for years before getting to the finals. In his 4 year span he won 1 series, and that was 'the shot', and got promptly beat down in the next series. He also got swept in his 37 ppg season (WHAT? Jordan would never allow a sweep!??) Basically Laker's get a rebound in that Phx series and its an identical run for Kobe...

As others have pointed out, in LA's 3-peat Kobe often had his best performances when the team needed him most and against the toughest opponents. The Kings and Blazers and Spurs were better then any of their finals opponents. Especially those series vs the Spurs with DR and Tim, Shaq struggled, especially in the 4th and Kobe took over the 4th again and again. LA got to the finals and continually faced teams that were so overmatched at C it was rediculous.

2000 - Shaq was just abusing an old worn out Rik Smits it was sad and their only backups were pathetic that they ended up putting PF Dale Davis on him a lot. Lost in Shaqs monster game 1 was Kobe who led the team in assists, limited his shots, and hounded Reggie into a 1-16 game, he was as key to game 1 as Shaq. Then he sprain his ankle pretty bad early in game 2 and LA barely rode Shaq to a win. Second game without Kobe... Shaq piled up the stats, but lost. Kobe comes back early, puts up a monster game and they take a commanding lead. Kobe had a horrid game 5, but had a very solid game 6 and LA won. Shaq definitely MVP, he was destructive, but Kobe had an underrated series.

2001 - Kobe dominates the Kings then Spurs including back to back 45-10 games to help the Lakers get to the finals. Game 1 Kobe didn't play that great but they continually fed Shaq to monster numbers 40-20 but he missed 12 fts, 11 shots and 4 TOs to the tune of 21 wasted possessions, (Kobe had 19) He also had no blocks and allowed Dikembe to produce a very efficient game. Monster numbers, overrated game, loss... They both picked it up the next game, Kobe in particular while also helping to limit AI severly in the second half to get the win. Again in game 2 they both dominate, but Shaq fouls out and Kobe out duals AI for win 2. Game 3 Kobe goes into facilitator mode and finishes an assist shy of a triple double while harassing the crap out of McKey and AI. Lakers win. Kobe and Shaq have equally nice games in the clincher and close it out despite many TOs and missed FTs by Shaq. Great series by both guys but Shaq got such monster numbers in the loss that he was inflated for the rest of the series. Despite Shaq's dominance, this series could have easily been Kobe's MVP.

2002 - Again Kobe rallies LA against the tough Spurs as Shaq struggles. Then against the Kings, both played near equally, each struggling in the losses and both starring in the wins. Then they face NJ in the finals that has no true center and Lakers sweep. Easy MVP for Shaq but Kobe played very well, excellent defense and efficient offensively.

2003 - Shaq injured and out of shape most of the year, Kobe carries team, Kobe dominates the Spurs, Shaq plays decent, just not enough as Spurs take the chip.

2004 - Kobe's low moment obviously, but not as bad as stats tell. Anyone who watched it saw an out of shape Shaq that was getting mostly single teamed by Ben Wallace and was mostly getting out played by him. He was slow on his rotations as Chauncy was ripping us apart on the pick and roll. He put up decent numbers a few times, but he energy and aggressiveness was not there. GP could do absolutely nothing that series, Fish was injured and sad, Malone was injured and couldn't do anything against Sheed, and Kobe was playing against a prime Prince backed by one of the better defenses in years. Kobe did an excellent job chasing and hounding Hamilton, and was trying to help on Chauncey as GP was just getting abused. He chucked and missed a lot, but his explosion in game 2 gave them their only win and the rest the whole team was just a mess. The whole team was bickering and choking and getting abused by the Pistons. Bad Kobe series, but bad team series also. A low point as a Kobe fan and a Laker fan...

2008 - Kobe dominated the first 3 rounds and the Lakers cruised but then ran into a defensive beast in Boston. Most of LA struggled, Pau and LO got roughed up inside, the SFs got roasted and the bench was frazzled under the pressure. He still put up back to back 30 pt nights and some high assist games, but struggled against that near illegal and overly physical Boston D (although he didn't struggle as bad as Bron or Wade did that year vs them) all while trying to chase Allen, switch to Rondo, and help with Pierce. Rough series for him and LA. Happens to the best of them (see Jordan vs Detroit..) No excuses, he improved and came back even better next year.

Eyes tell a whole different story then OP's little stat lines ever could. You can knock Kobe a lot, he's got flaws and had plenty of struggles, but you can't deny his overall career and post season play. Scoff at having Shaq for the first 3 chips, but he was 1B on that team and the only reason he was 1B was because of how dominant Shaq was then. Any other team and he's 1A. Definite advantage, but the talent drop after that was sharp. There were deeper teams all over the league, those two just beat them. Haters gonna hate no matter what though...
User avatar
LA Warrior
Pro Prospect
Posts: 844
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: Golden State

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#35 » by LA Warrior » Tue May 25, 2010 7:05 am

^ Bravo.

Man knows his Lakers.

Kobe's been in SIX finals. That stat alone is "impressive".
Greatest comment I've ever received.
Phil Jackson wrote:I've never really had a favorite poster but this guy might be it. The symbolism he uses is deep and ****.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#36 » by azuresou1 » Tue May 25, 2010 2:34 pm

supaflash wrote:This thread is full of so much fail.

lame poster pulling up some minimal stats trying to prove a point but probably never watched any of the games he's trying to talk about.

Of course Shaq was ridiculously dominant, no one underestimates his prime, arguably the best prime of any player ever. Yes Kobe was obviously blessed to play with him, but so has any star that has won in this league. But don't forget, Shaq couldn't win with all that Orlando talent out east, and came in to a playoff Laker team and couldn't win anything either until Kobe became dominant. And he only won once after leaving Kobe when Wade was dominant.

OP also likes to bring up the few years of Kobe by himself, what did you expect when they blew up the team and brought in new coaches etc? Are you mentally handicapped? How often do new teams just rocket to the top? How often has any 6-8 seed won a first round series? Don't forget MJ lost for years before getting to the finals. In his 4 year span he won 1 series, and that was 'the shot', and got promptly beat down in the next series. He also got swept in his 37 ppg season (WHAT? Jordan would never allow a sweep!??) Basically Laker's get a rebound in that Phx series and its an identical run for Kobe...

As others have pointed out, in LA's 3-peat Kobe often had his best performances when the team needed him most and against the toughest opponents. The Kings and Blazers and Spurs were better then any of their finals opponents. Especially those series vs the Spurs with DR and Tim, Shaq struggled, especially in the 4th and Kobe took over the 4th again and again. LA got to the finals and continually faced teams that were so overmatched at C it was rediculous.

2000 - Shaq was just abusing an old worn out Rik Smits it was sad and their only backups were pathetic that they ended up putting PF Dale Davis on him a lot. Lost in Shaqs monster game 1 was Kobe who led the team in assists, limited his shots, and hounded Reggie into a 1-16 game, he was as key to game 1 as Shaq. Then he sprain his ankle pretty bad early in game 2 and LA barely rode Shaq to a win. Second game without Kobe... Shaq piled up the stats, but lost. Kobe comes back early, puts up a monster game and they take a commanding lead. Kobe had a horrid game 5, but had a very solid game 6 and LA won. Shaq definitely MVP, he was destructive, but Kobe had an underrated series.

2001 - Kobe dominates the Kings then Spurs including back to back 45-10 games to help the Lakers get to the finals. Game 1 Kobe didn't play that great but they continually fed Shaq to monster numbers 40-20 but he missed 12 fts, 11 shots and 4 TOs to the tune of 21 wasted possessions, (Kobe had 19) He also had no blocks and allowed Dikembe to produce a very efficient game. Monster numbers, overrated game, loss... They both picked it up the next game, Kobe in particular while also helping to limit AI severly in the second half to get the win. Again in game 2 they both dominate, but Shaq fouls out and Kobe out duals AI for win 2. Game 3 Kobe goes into facilitator mode and finishes an assist shy of a triple double while harassing the crap out of McKey and AI. Lakers win. Kobe and Shaq have equally nice games in the clincher and close it out despite many TOs and missed FTs by Shaq. Great series by both guys but Shaq got such monster numbers in the loss that he was inflated for the rest of the series. Despite Shaq's dominance, this series could have easily been Kobe's MVP.

2002 - Again Kobe rallies LA against the tough Spurs as Shaq struggles. Then against the Kings, both played near equally, each struggling in the losses and both starring in the wins. Then they face NJ in the finals that has no true center and Lakers sweep. Easy MVP for Shaq but Kobe played very well, excellent defense and efficient offensively.

2003 - Shaq injured and out of shape most of the year, Kobe carries team, Kobe dominates the Spurs, Shaq plays decent, just not enough as Spurs take the chip.

2004 - Kobe's low moment obviously, but not as bad as stats tell. Anyone who watched it saw an out of shape Shaq that was getting mostly single teamed by Ben Wallace and was mostly getting out played by him. He was slow on his rotations as Chauncy was ripping us apart on the pick and roll. He put up decent numbers a few times, but he energy and aggressiveness was not there. GP could do absolutely nothing that series, Fish was injured and sad, Malone was injured and couldn't do anything against Sheed, and Kobe was playing against a prime Prince backed by one of the better defenses in years. Kobe did an excellent job chasing and hounding Hamilton, and was trying to help on Chauncey as GP was just getting abused. He chucked and missed a lot, but his explosion in game 2 gave them their only win and the rest the whole team was just a mess. The whole team was bickering and choking and getting abused by the Pistons. Bad Kobe series, but bad team series also. A low point as a Kobe fan and a Laker fan...

2008 - Kobe dominated the first 3 rounds and the Lakers cruised but then ran into a defensive beast in Boston. Most of LA struggled, Pau and LO got roughed up inside, the SFs got roasted and the bench was frazzled under the pressure. He still put up back to back 30 pt nights and some high assist games, but struggled against that near illegal and overly physical Boston D (although he didn't struggle as bad as Bron or Wade did that year vs them) all while trying to chase Allen, switch to Rondo, and help with Pierce. Rough series for him and LA. Happens to the best of them (see Jordan vs Detroit..) No excuses, he improved and came back even better next year.

Eyes tell a whole different story then OP's little stat lines ever could. You can knock Kobe a lot, he's got flaws and had plenty of struggles, but you can't deny his overall career and post season play. Scoff at having Shaq for the first 3 chips, but he was 1B on that team and the only reason he was 1B was because of how dominant Shaq was then. Any other team and he's 1A. Definite advantage, but the talent drop after that was sharp. There were deeper teams all over the league, those two just beat them. Haters gonna hate no matter what though...


+10
microfib4thewin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,275
And1: 454
Joined: Jun 20, 2008
 

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#37 » by microfib4thewin » Tue May 25, 2010 5:11 pm

This is what happens when people just go to stat sites and try to gauge a player's performance based entirely on that. Kobe isn't the greatest performer in the Finals, but he did fine in 2001 and 2009. He drew Dwight outside the paint so much last year Gasol was able to shoot 60% in that series, and in 2001 he had his fair share of clutch performance and spectacular defense against AI.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,801
And1: 22,707
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#38 » by Doctor MJ » Tue May 25, 2010 8:49 pm

nbhadja wrote:He gets hyped a lot because he is from the huge market of LA. I was shocked when I saw voters vote that Kobe was a better Laker than Shaq. It was no comparison!

I could understand if he was the only one on the team but he has played for extremely talented teams. Shaq took up double coverage in the first 4 NBA finals where Kobe still struggled and in the past 2 NBA finals, while Kobe was the best on his team he had good teammates that prevented opposing teams from locking down on Kobe.


It's funny. In a thread like this, I'd expect to come down on your side. I do think some tremendously overrated Kobe - and they tend to appear in mass in this kind of a thread.

I'd rate Kobe ahead of Shaq as the better Laker though. Shaq is someone who tends to cause as much bad as good. Yeah, he led the Lakers to 3 titles, and that's huge. The team should have done a lot more though, and that's on Shaq. Meanwhile, they don't win those rings without Kobe, and Kobe's kept fighting hard for the Lakers, and now appears to be set to take the Lakers to their 3rd straight final. I really don't think you'd fine more than 2% of Laker fans who think Shaq is the greater Laker.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Harmless
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 11, 2004
Location: Philippines

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#39 » by Harmless » Fri May 28, 2010 8:05 am

I don't think anybody can seriously question that Kobe's a great player.

However, what the stats will tell you that our subjective experience will probably not is that despite the many great performances Kobe has had, there are also many bad performances that bring down his stats. I guess that's what really separates him from the likes of MJ. MJ was consistently great, with far less bad performances.

It's fine to highlight what Kobe has achieved so far, as long as you don't forget his failures too. Stats can do that. It averages all his performances.

I'm not saying we should rely on stats alone. We shouldn't. But some people here are doing just the opposite and basing everything on subjective opinion alone.
jicama
Freshman
Posts: 67
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 25, 2010

Re: Analyzing Kobe Bryant's NBA finals stats.. not so impressive 

Post#40 » by jicama » Fri May 28, 2010 1:51 pm

Here's a recent statistical review of Jordan, Kobe, and LeBron in the same age interval (21-25):
http://www.apbr.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3074

Finals stats are not reviewed, but overall playoffs are. Kobe's Finals numbers have generally not been as good as his playoffs, which in turn have been well below his season stats.

Return to Statistical Analysis