ImageImageImage

Athletic testing numbers are out

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#1 » by jpatrick » Thu May 27, 2010 3:32 pm

Here's a link to espn. You need insider though. I'm sure they will be up on DX within moments if they are not up already.


Code: Select all

Player No step vert
 Max vert
 Bench press (185 lbs) Lane agility 3/4 court sprint
reach
Solomon Alabi 22.5 26.0 10 13.2 3.68
Cole Aldrich 23.0 28.0 10 11.48 3.35
Al-Farouq Aminu 27.0 33.5 13 11.29 3.3
James Anderson 30.0 35.5 14 11.86 3.19
Luke Babbitt 29.5 37.5 15 10.98 3.4
Eric Bledsoe -N-a -N-a 9 -N-a -N-a
Trevor Booker 31.0 36.0 22 11.15 3.1
Craig Brackins 26.0 35.0 6 11.65 3.39
Avery Bradley 31.5 37.5 2 11.47 3.14
Derrick Caracter 25.0 30.5 22 12.78 3.61
Sherron Collins 27.5 33.0 -N-a 12.31 3.24
DeMarcus Cousins 23.5 27.5 -N-a 11.4 3.55
Jordan Crawford 31.5 34.5 7 11.03 3.37
Ed Davis 31.0 36.0 -N-a 11.7 3.21
Devin Ebanks 23.5 32.0 6 11.69 3.44
Derrick Favors 31.5 35.5 14 11.74 3.25
Keith Gallon 23.5 28.5 14 13.44 3.7
Charles Garcia 24.5 30.5 2 11.65 3.23
Paul George -N-a -N-a 4 -N-a -N-a
Luke Harangody 24.0 28.5 23 11.83 3.41
Manny Harris -N-a -N-a 11 -N-a -N-a
Lazar Hayward 31.0 36.0 15 10.87 3.31
Gordon Hayward 30.5 34.5 10  11.73  3.22 
Xavier Henry 28.5  36.5  8  11.1  3.18 
Darington Hobson  29.0  34.0  -N-a  11.68  3.25 
Damion James  29.0  33.0  13  10.89  3.2 
Armon Johnson  31.5  38.5  18  11.25  3.19 
Wesley Johnson  32.0  37.0  16  11.43  3.14 
Dominique Jones  26.0  32.5  19  10.88  3.31 
Jerome Jordan  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a 
Sylven Landesberg  28.0  32.0  8  11.59  3.36 
Gani Lawal  27.0  31.5  20  11.61  3.24 
Greg Monroe  25.0  29.0  15  12.1  3.35 
Daniel Orton  24.0  30.5  13  12.32  3.39 
Artsiom Parakhouski  25.5  26.5 16  12.07  3.33 
Patrick Patterson  28.5  33.5  17  11.14  3.25 
Dexter Pittman -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a 
Andy Rautins 23.5  30.5  8  11.27  3.49 
Ryan Richards 25.0  28.5  4  11.33  3.37
Stanley Robinson  -N-a  37.5  6  11.65  3.23 
Larry Sanders  25.5  28.0  7  12.49  3.27 
Jon Scheyer  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a 
Lance Stephenson  27.0  33.0  10  11.39  3.38 
Mikhail Torrance  23.0  32.0  8  11.43  3.17 
Evan Turner  27.5  34.5  9  11.06  3.27 
Ekpe Udoh  31.0  33.5  10  11.15  3.29 
Jarvis Varnado  29.5  32.5  3  11.61  3.37 
Greivis Vasquez  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a  -N-a 
John Wall  30.0  39.0  -N-a  10.84  3.14 
Willie Warren 23.0  31.5  10  11.21  3.5 
Terrico White  31.0  40.0  10  11.38  3.15 
Hassan Whiteside  27.0  31.5  12  11.83  3.54 


http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft2010/insider/columns/story?columnist=ford_chad&page=Draftchart-100526
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#2 » by jpatrick » Thu May 27, 2010 3:35 pm

First throughts:

Cousins is quick but not a leaper (we already knew). Luke Babbit, holy crap, you just become a top 10 pick possibly. Turner isn't a leaper. Maybe those Roy comparisons aren't accurate. People thought Roy was unathletic but then he jumped 40.5" at the combine (Turner was 34.5").
User avatar
SSUBluesman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,277
And1: 1,563
Joined: Nov 02, 2004

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#3 » by SSUBluesman » Thu May 27, 2010 4:05 pm

I think they're interesting for the sake of comparison (Wall v. Rose) however I don't put any substantive stock in them. Everything I need to know about a guy's leaping, strength, speed, etc. is easily seen in the game where it matters most. Height/length is different in that these things are not as easily known (at least accurately) and aren't at least partially the result of how good you are at taking agility tests and the like.
Naz Reid.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#4 » by AQuintus » Thu May 27, 2010 4:17 pm

SSUBluesman wrote:I think they're interesting for the sake of comparison (Wall v. Rose) however I don't put any substantive stock in them. Everything I need to know about a guy's leaping, strength, speed, etc. is easily seen in the game where it matters most. Height/length is different in that these things are not as easily known (at least accurately) and aren't at least partially the result of how good you are at taking agility tests and the like.


Yep, as fun as it is to look at these numbers and draw conclusions, you don't have to look further than Kevin Love (who's max vertical was just as good as Anthony Randolph and Dwyane Wade and 3/4 sprint was the same as Chris Paul and .01 second slower than Jonny Flynn) to know that these measurements really don't mean much of anything. If a guy looks athletic in college, he's going to be athletic in the NBA regardless of what the numbers say.
Image
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#5 » by AQuintus » Thu May 27, 2010 5:40 pm

Something else to think about:

AQuintus wrote:The vertical numbers seemed really low to me for a lot of guys so I looked back at the numbers for the guys that measure previously:

Luke Harongody:

2009: 27" no step, 31" max
2010: 24" no step, 28.5" max

Damion James:

2009: 30" no step, 37" max
2010: 29" no step, 33" max

Gani Lawal:

2009: 30" no step, 34.5" max
2010: 27" no step, 31.5" max

This is another reason why these tests don't mean much, they very widely year to year even with the same people.

Edit: Fixed a typo in Lawal's measurements.
Image
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#6 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu May 27, 2010 6:06 pm

I think global warming is **** up earth's gravity. Thanks a lot George Bush you jerk!
Image
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#7 » by IAmTheTruth » Thu May 27, 2010 6:08 pm

Impressed with James Anderson's numbers. I've narrowed down the 16 to Babbitt, George, Henry, or Anderson. One of those 4 has got to be it. They all tested positively, so there is a chance they are all off the board, which would suck majorly for us.
Don't ban me
Child of Wonder
Freshman
Posts: 98
And1: 27
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#8 » by Child of Wonder » Thu May 27, 2010 7:41 pm

AQuintus wrote:Something else to think about:

AQuintus wrote:The vertical numbers seemed really low to me for a lot of guys so I looked back at the numbers for the guys that measure previously:

Luke Harongody:

2009: 27" no step, 31" max
2010: 24" no step, 28.5" max

Damion James:

2009: 30" no step, 37" max
2010: 29" no step, 33" max

Gani Lawal:

2009: 30" no step, 34.5" max
2010: 27" no step, 31.5" max

This is another reason why these tests don't mean much, they very widely year to year even with the same people.

Edit: Fixed a typo in Lawal's measurements.


Is it possible these guys were more commited to physical training after not making the NBA last year?
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#9 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu May 27, 2010 7:52 pm

but....they're worse
Image
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#10 » by AQuintus » Thu May 27, 2010 9:05 pm

Child of Wonder wrote:Is it possible these guys were more commited to physical training after not making the NBA last year?


Do you really think that their thought process was, "Oh I didn't get drafted, so instead of working my butt off, I'm going to coast the rest of the year and lose millions of dollars."?

I seriously doubt that. If anything, it would probably make them more committed, especially Harangody, who's draft stock is bad because of his poor athleticism.

There are other examples of this happening in past years, too. Obviously the sample size is small because not many people go through the combine twice, but it does show that these tests probably aren't all that accurate.
Image
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#11 » by Krapinsky » Thu May 27, 2010 9:11 pm

Those players probably just got a little stronger and the added weight affected their vertical.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#12 » by C.lupus » Thu May 27, 2010 9:13 pm

I think they lowered the floor a couple inches this year.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#13 » by horaceworthy » Thu May 27, 2010 9:44 pm

The downgrade in Turner's vertical makes sense to me, somebody just got max and no-step mixed up when they put the graphic up during the broadcast. Weird to see Jordan Crawford's 36" no-step turn into 31.5" no-step and 34.5" max. Ford also stated on Twitter Babbitt's 3/4 court sprint was 3.19, but has him listed at 3.4.

Lazar Hayward tested very well. 7'0.75" wingspan, 31" no-step, 36" max, 10.87 agility (although that's mostly technique). Gordon Hayward was good in every athletic category other than the agility drill. Disappointing lack of participation by Bledsoe and George.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#14 » by AQuintus » Thu May 27, 2010 9:55 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Those players probably just got a little stronger and the added weight affected their vertical.


Harangody:

2009: 240 pounds, 11.2% BF
2010: 240 pounds, 11.1% BF

James:

2009: 224 pounds, 8.2% BF
2010: 227 pounds, 9.6% BF

Lawal:

2009: 229 pounds, 7.2% BF
2010: 233 pounds, 6.3% BF

Some slight changes, but nothing that would drop 3 inches off of someone's max vert.
Image
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#15 » by shangrila » Thu May 27, 2010 10:54 pm

Anyone else find it funny Henry only managed to bench 8?
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#16 » by Esohny » Thu May 27, 2010 11:23 pm

shangrila wrote:Anyone else find it funny Henry only managed to bench 8?


Not really.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#17 » by Krapinsky » Thu May 27, 2010 11:30 pm

Henry has really long arms, and those guys usually aren't good benchers. Durant put up 0.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#18 » by jade_hippo » Fri May 28, 2010 3:34 am

dang, I was hoping to see numbers for Bledsoe, guy is almost the exact same size as me, he's got me in wingspan by about a half an inch and 20lbs, but I have him in standing reach by about an inch. Its lovely to see just how not cut out for the NBA I am compared to someone my size.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#19 » by GopherIt! » Fri May 28, 2010 5:14 am

Anyone else find it funny Henry only managed to bench 8?


:lol:

:thinking: :oops:
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Athletic testing numbers are out 

Post#20 » by shangrila » Sat May 29, 2010 5:07 am

Krapinsky wrote:Henry has really long arms, and those guys usually aren't good benchers. Durant put up 0.

But Durant was skinny and strength was a question for him anyway. Henry is widely known for his strength.

Just thought he'd reach double digits at least.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves