I was reading an article a few weeks back that talked about how the league is evolving. It used to be that having two superstars and a few good role players was enough to contend year in and year out. Now days, you need two superstars, a star and a few good role players in order to contend. Think Celtics and Lakers of recent years. Considering injuries and things of that sort, its no longer a given that having two superstars is gonna be enough to get the job done. So where you say that having Bosh and James is 80% of the equation, I say that its more like 60-65%. So the bottom line is, even if you guys are fortunate enough to get those two guys, there is still lots of work to be done. And its gonna start with a willingness to compete on the defensive side of the court.
It's an interesting theory but I'm not sure I agree.
Who is the third star on the Lakers?
Kobe has been surpassed (in almost all aspects) by LeBron and I'd take Bosh over Gasol. Our top two guys would be better and arguably Gallo can be at least as good as Odom, although he has a little ways to go. And we can trade Curry for serviceable pieces.
Lakers are going to be a 2-time champion with the current roster (I believe) and I'd give the Knicks the edge on the top two guys. Plus the supporting guys -- Gallo, Wilson, even Toney and Bill Walker -- are all young and capable role players.
Knicks would be close to being an elite team just with LBJ & Bosh. I know people don't want to accept that because they've had the Knicks to kick around for so long. But it's hard to deny.
The NBA is not that complicated. Two stars and you're pretty much going to be able to beat anyone.