Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,161
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 23, 2007
- Location: The DMV
Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Ouch. Russillo even says he didn't believe the rumors at first of Beasley being so unwanted, but it's the second time he's heard it from legit sources. He said Rod Thorn said no to Beasley for Keyon freaking Dooling.
Beasley's trade value = negative.
Just so you know who Rusillo is, he works for ESPN and is co-host of the scott van pelt show. His podcast is actually pretty good - it's like the trades and transactions board in audio form.
Beasley's trade value = negative.
Just so you know who Rusillo is, he works for ESPN and is co-host of the scott van pelt show. His podcast is actually pretty good - it's like the trades and transactions board in audio form.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,446
- And1: 414
- Joined: May 19, 2008
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Hahaha. While it sounds bad, its because Dooling is probably going to get cut if we need the extra cap space. If Dooling's contract was fully guaranteed, I think Rod Thorn would have pulled the trigger.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,346
- And1: 765
- Joined: Jan 08, 2010
- Location: Kingdom of Heaven
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Jersey Generals wrote:Hahaha. While it sounds bad, its because Dooling is probably going to get cut if we need the extra cap space. If Dooling's contract was fully guaranteed, I think Rod Thorn would have pulled the trigger.
Probably.. but that's the only reason Miami wanted the trade too of course.. to increase cap.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 10,533
- And1: 10
- Joined: Aug 28, 2004
- Location: In between a pimp and a hard place
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
HAHA sucks for Supercoolbeas
Wikipedia says Ryen Russillo wa born in Compton, is this true? If so, he's straight gangster!!!
Wikipedia says Ryen Russillo wa born in Compton, is this true? If so, he's straight gangster!!!
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Jersey Generals wrote:Hahaha. While it sounds bad, its because Dooling is probably going to get cut if we need the extra cap space. If Dooling's contract was fully guaranteed, I think Rod Thorn would have pulled the trigger.
Exactly. Beasley may be worth less than capspace to teams with max capspace (and teams who may be competing directly, or trying to, with Miami for the same FAs) but it doesn't necessarily mean he is negative value to every other team.
(That assumes this is true in the first place. I don't know who Ryan Rusillo is, or his general level of credibility.)
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
- Hoopalotta
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,937
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
loserX wrote:(That assumes this is true in the first place. I don't know who Ryan Rusillo is, or his general level of credibility.)
He does that radio-podcast thing on ESPN. I'd put his credibility as being darn pretty good.

Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,446
- And1: 414
- Joined: May 19, 2008
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
pass first wrote:that's the only reason Miami wanted the trade too of course.. to increase cap.
Yup, unless Miami thinks Dooling could be their starting point and would rather use Beasley's salary on a point guard, but I very much doubt that.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,939
- And1: 3
- Joined: Aug 26, 2006
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Trading Beasley alone wouldn't give Miami enough cap space to sign a 3rd max free agent, though, so without other deals in place, I don't see why Miami would simply give Beasley away. Also, Beasley for Dooling straight up doesn't work, and the Nets don't really have any suitable filler, so it would have to be done after NJ gets cap space. But Dooling would have to be waived before then (June 29) for Miami to see any real cap space benefit. These factors make the rumored deal kind of sketchy.

Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Flash is the Future wrote:Trading Beasley alone wouldn't give Miami enough cap space to sign a 3rd max free agent, though, so without other deals in place, I don't see why Miami would simply give Beasley away.
Well, Cook and Jones are probably easier to move for the 18th pick and maybe the future Toronto pick if Beasley is moved on his own for pure cap space. Maybe the 18th and Jones to Washington for their TPE, so he can be cut before his contract becomes guaranteed, then Cook for the future Toronto 1st in a seperate deal.
Also, Beasley for Dooling straight up doesn't work, and the Nets don't really have any suitable filler, so it would have to be done after NJ gets cap space.
Works with CDR as the filler and he is a team option for the coming season.
But Dooling would have to be waived before then (June 29) for Miami to see any real cap space benefit. These factors make the rumored deal kind of sketchy.
^^See above.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 7,502
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
How about Delonte West's Erik Dampuier type of contract for Beasley.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
- Bac2Basics
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,588
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 03, 2001
- Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Beasley has failed to live up to expectations, he'll be a decent rotation player on most teams but rarely more than that.
For Beasley to be most effective, he'll need to be a veteran team where he's not relied on to be a major piece.
For Beasley to be most effective, he'll need to be a veteran team where he's not relied on to be a major piece.
Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.
~ Herman Melville
~ Herman Melville
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
- MoneyTalks41890
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,742
- And1: 24,969
- Joined: Oct 13, 2009
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
DowJones wrote:How about Delonte West's Erik Dampuier type of contract for Beasley.
That is a pretty damn good idea.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:DowJones wrote:How about Delonte West's Erik Dampuier type of contract for Beasley.
That is a pretty damn good idea.
Except that Miami and Cleveland are not exactly looking to help each other out at this point in time.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 29,176
- And1: 3,953
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
If true, NJ turned this down because:
1. This would add about 4.5m to their payroll and cut about 4.5m for Miami
2. Miami is going to be one of NJ's biggest competitors in free agency
3. NJ expects to land Favors or Cousins and already have Yi + Humphries at PF
4. Beasley's character issues
I don't know what I would have done is I were Thorn, but I can see why he said no.
1. This would add about 4.5m to their payroll and cut about 4.5m for Miami
2. Miami is going to be one of NJ's biggest competitors in free agency
3. NJ expects to land Favors or Cousins and already have Yi + Humphries at PF
4. Beasley's character issues
I don't know what I would have done is I were Thorn, but I can see why he said no.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 7,502
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
loserX wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:DowJones wrote:How about Delonte West's Erik Dampuier type of contract for Beasley.
That is a pretty damn good idea.
Except that Miami and Cleveland are not exactly looking to help each other out at this point in time.
Yeah, that's a problem. Obviously it would have to be done after LeBron says he will re-sign with Cleveland. Especially since I think Cleveland could package Beasley in a deal with Hickson/expiring contracts to get a better player.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,128
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 30, 2009
- Location: Lomita,CA
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Geezus Id give sasha,2nd for Beasly
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
CDM88 wrote:Geezus Id give sasha,2nd for Beasly
And that helps Miami how?

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,002
- And1: 6,019
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
vincecarter4pres wrote:CDM88 wrote:Geezus Id give sasha,2nd for Beasly
And that helps Miami how?
low post scoring noob

Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,128
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 30, 2009
- Location: Lomita,CA
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Devilzsidewalk wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:CDM88 wrote:Geezus Id give sasha,2nd for Beasly
And that helps Miami how?
low post scoring noob
Ah save it i was just talking outta my ass. Its amazing how far beasly value has plummeted. I wouldnt be suprised if he pulls that suicide threat crap again once he finds out he couldnt fetch keyon doodo.
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Per Ryan Rusillo Podcast-NJ turned down Beasley for Dooling
Devilzsidewalk wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:CDM88 wrote:Geezus Id give sasha,2nd for Beasly
And that helps Miami how?
low post scoring noob


Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Return to Trades and Transactions