ImageImageImage

Min/Mem

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

ritt0093
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

Min/Mem 

Post#1 » by ritt0093 » Thu Jun 3, 2010 3:06 pm

Ok, so this is more out of left field, but I viewed it as an alternative to Jefferson for Price + #7.

*this is assuming a salary cap of 56.1M, therefore a max contract is 30% of that or 16.83M.

http://www.nba.com/2010/news/04/16/boar ... index.html

Memphis in/Minnesota Out
Al Jefferson
Jonny Flynn
23rd Pick (to be sold for cash, since Memphis has a lot of late 1st rounders now)

Memphis Out/Minnesota In
Zach Randolph (expiring)
O.J. Mayo
12th pick


This plays to the fiscal side of the Memphis ownership. This saves Memphis almost 6 million in cap room in 2010. Combined with their current cap sapce they would have in the range of 15 Million of room. That should allow them to match reasonable (non max salary) offers for Rudy Gay and resign Ronnie Brewer without going into the luxury threshold. In addition, they get a similar offensive player to Randolph in Jefferson, but one that is signed long term. Jefferson combined with Thabeet and Gasol is a strong front court. they have also been on record as saying they are looking at PGs in the draft. Flynn is easily better than the draft PGs outside of Wall. And having a draft pick to sell for cash never hurt anyone (and Glen Taylor won't miss it).

Minnesota gets a massive expiring in Randolph like they would in Prince. However, they would only get the 12th Pick here instead of the 7th. In return they turn Flynn and the 23rd into O.J. Mayo. Someone who can obviously be a scorer, and who I think would pair nicely with Brewer. Given the improvement we saw in Brewer last year I would be excited to see the staff work with Mayo, and see if he can become more efficient.

This would be Minnesota's line up:

PG: Sessions (Rubio in 2011)
SG: Mayo
SF: Brewer, 12th Pick to be in rotation with Mayo and Brewer
PF: Love, Randolph, Pekovic?
C: Cousins, 16th Pick?, Milicic?

I like this team, especially when Randolph exipires.

So any thoughts? Is this much worse than the Jefferson for Prince + 7 deals? I personally feel we can get a similar player at 12 that we can at 7, and the positional fit and upgrade of Flynn to Mayo is enough for me to take the drop in 7 to 12. Who know's maybe Kahn could turn Randoplh around as a 1 year rental to a team with a short term low post need?
TRUEwolvesFAN04
Ballboy
Posts: 17
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 21, 2010

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#2 » by TRUEwolvesFAN04 » Thu Jun 3, 2010 3:12 pm

Wolves easily pass on this one.. I thought the grizz wanted to keep Randolph??

How about OJ Mayo + #12 for Al Jeff?
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,887
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#3 » by karch34 » Thu Jun 3, 2010 3:30 pm

It makes some sense financially for Memphis, but I don't think they do it from a value stand point alone as whatever you think about Jefferson vs. Randolph, Mayo and #12 is worth a lot more than Flynn and #23.

No way they even consider Mayo and 12 for Jefferson if they have Randolph on the team, IMO
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#4 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Jun 3, 2010 3:53 pm

what if we combine them and do Jefferson for Prince/#7, then turn around and trade Flynn/7 for Mayo, and then we can also offer to take Conley for a future 2nd or something (I'm assuming they don't want to pay 5 million for Conley and moving him would help free up money for Re-signing Rudy Gay)

Cousins
Love
Prince
Mayo
Conley
Image
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#5 » by funkatron101 » Thu Jun 3, 2010 3:55 pm

TRUEwolvesFAN04 wrote:Wolves easily pass on this one.. I thought the grizz wanted to keep Randolph??

How about OJ Mayo + #12 for Al Jeff?

:roll:
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#6 » by IAmTheTruth » Thu Jun 3, 2010 5:55 pm

It's so sad that we're talking about trading for guys that we already drafted and traded away...
Don't ban me
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#7 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Jun 3, 2010 6:26 pm

we didn't trade him because he sucked, we traded him because we wanted a different good player

we might trade Cousins for Turner, but I'd still trade to get Cousins back if the price is right
Image
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#8 » by shangrila » Thu Jun 3, 2010 11:08 pm

I thought we traded him because he didn't want to be here?
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#9 » by southern wolf » Fri Jun 4, 2010 4:11 am

Mayo never said he didn't want to play for the Wolves. McHale just wanted Love more.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#10 » by shrink » Fri Jun 4, 2010 4:16 am

southern wolf wrote:Mayo never said he didn't want to play for the Wolves. McHale just wanted Love more.

McHale liked Mayo well enough to draft him in front of Love.

The deal was done because the total trade was very valuable. MIN traded Mayo and got Love, but also Mike Miller (that led to Rubio), plus an additional $7.6 mil in 2010 cap space.

I was convinced during the draft that the wolves couldn't pass on Mayo, but I had to do a lot of convincing when I mentioned to some other posters that this was too rich an offer to decline. The only way MIN could lose this deal was if Mayo became a superstar, and right now he's a logn way from that .. I wouldn't even say he's a better player than just Love.
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#11 » by IAmTheTruth » Fri Jun 4, 2010 5:12 am

Devilzsidewalk wrote:we didn't trade him because he sucked, we traded him because we wanted a different good player

we might trade Cousins for Turner, but I'd still trade to get Cousins back if the price is right



I know he doesn't suck, the point is that we should have just kept Mayo in the first place instead of trading him for a guy that most T-Wolves fans are willing to deal right now.
Don't ban me
User avatar
Breakdown777
Veteran
Posts: 2,759
And1: 47
Joined: Sep 17, 2009
Location: MN

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#12 » by Breakdown777 » Fri Jun 4, 2010 6:18 am

IAmTheTruth wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:we didn't trade him because he sucked, we traded him because we wanted a different good player

we might trade Cousins for Turner, but I'd still trade to get Cousins back if the price is right



I know he doesn't suck, the point is that we should have just kept Mayo in the first place instead of trading him for a guy that most T-Wolves fans are willing to deal right now.


Phooey. No Mayo/Love trades means no Mike Miller means not a good enough player to trade for the 5 pick that was Rubio.

I'd love to get the (Mayo) Clinic back to the team that drafted him, but I don't know how it would work, especially with the assumptions that MEM doesn't like to trade with us because we fleeced them in that deal (isn't it believe that chris wallace might've turned down 5 & 6 for 2?)
"Llevaré mi talento a Minnesota".
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#13 » by shangrila » Fri Jun 4, 2010 8:35 am

southern wolf wrote:Mayo never said he didn't want to play for the Wolves. McHale just wanted Love more.

I know this isn't proof, but doesn't anyone remember watching his face when the Wolves picked him? The guy looked like we raped his entire family in front of him and then made him pay us to do it again.
User avatar
IAmTheTruth
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Minnesota

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#14 » by IAmTheTruth » Fri Jun 4, 2010 10:42 am

Breakdown777 wrote:
IAmTheTruth wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:we didn't trade him because he sucked, we traded him because we wanted a different good player

we might trade Cousins for Turner, but I'd still trade to get Cousins back if the price is right



I know he doesn't suck, the point is that we should have just kept Mayo in the first place instead of trading him for a guy that most T-Wolves fans are willing to deal right now.


Phooey. No Mayo/Love trades means no Mike Miller means not a good enough player to trade for the 5 pick that was Rubio.

I'd love to get the (Mayo) Clinic back to the team that drafted him, but I don't know how it would work, especially with the assumptions that MEM doesn't like to trade with us because we fleeced them in that deal (isn't it believe that chris wallace might've turned down 5 & 6 for 2?)



Yeah, I thought about that. Maybe it was for the best, but let's not forget that Rubio still isn't wearing the uniform. I agree though that Love + Rubio > Mayo.
Don't ban me
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#15 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri Jun 4, 2010 5:52 pm

shangrila wrote:
southern wolf wrote:Mayo never said he didn't want to play for the Wolves. McHale just wanted Love more.

I know this isn't proof, but doesn't anyone remember watching his face when the Wolves picked him? The guy looked like we raped his entire family in front of him and then made him pay us to do it again.


plus made the Wolves jump through hoops to watch him work out. If I'm up for a job and tell the employer they have to come interview me in another state, that means I don't want to work for that employer
Image
User avatar
SSUBluesman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,277
And1: 1,563
Joined: Nov 02, 2004

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#16 » by SSUBluesman » Fri Jun 4, 2010 7:41 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:
shangrila wrote:
southern wolf wrote:Mayo never said he didn't want to play for the Wolves. McHale just wanted Love more.

I know this isn't proof, but doesn't anyone remember watching his face when the Wolves picked him? The guy looked like we raped his entire family in front of him and then made him pay us to do it again.


plus made the Wolves jump through hoops to watch him work out. If I'm up for a job and tell the employer they have to come interview me in another state, that means I don't want to work for that employer


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYGenk_4lOc

Never let facts get in the way of a good piece of fiction...
Naz Reid.
User avatar
GrizzledGrizzFan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,571
And1: 161
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: Just south of Memphis, as the crow flies...
     

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#17 » by GrizzledGrizzFan » Fri Jun 4, 2010 9:33 pm

Man - can't folks be happy that the trade worked out well for both teams?
Image
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#18 » by shangrila » Fri Jun 4, 2010 10:47 pm

SSUBluesman wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:
shangrila wrote:I know this isn't proof, but doesn't anyone remember watching his face when the Wolves picked him? The guy looked like we raped his entire family in front of him and then made him pay us to do it again.


plus made the Wolves jump through hoops to watch him work out. If I'm up for a job and tell the employer they have to come interview me in another state, that means I don't want to work for that employer


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYGenk_4lOc

Never let facts get in the way of a good piece of fiction...

Yeah...still looks like we just cut off his wang when they hand him that cap.

Actually, what was the point of posting that? It's not like the guy is going to come outright and say he doesn't want to play for the team 5 minutes after they drafted him.
User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

Re: Min/Mem 

Post#19 » by mandurugo » Sat Jun 5, 2010 2:35 am

GrizzledGrizzFan wrote:Man - can't folks be happy that the trade worked out well for both teams?


I don't think the wolves are in a position to say the trade worked out well for them. It hasn't worked out to well for the Memphis yet either.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves