Post#23 » by heathmalc » Sun May 30, 2010 3:21 pm
The CBA, which governs players, etc, says that there can NOT be a player-coach. The reasoning for this is the circumvention of CBA rules that define what a player's maximum salary can be, and the number of years that contract can be for.
I have been reading the CBA, pouring over that BORING set of documents made available by the NBAPA.
I believe that I have found a loop-hole in CBA. One which were to allow a player-coach.
LeBron is a free-agent - assuming he doesn't take his option year or signs an extension - This basically puts him in the same category that Lindsay Hunter was in last season. Hunter signed as an assistant coach with the Chicago Bulls. Interestingly, I have yet to find a rule that says a coach cannot suit-up for the team. This is likely because it hasn't really been thought of since the league instituted a salary cap, and the "no Player-Coach." rule.
I understand that some of you would say that a Player-coach & a coach who plays is the same thing. However, according to the CBA it is not. You see, it is quite legal for a team to allow a coach to play in a game... there is no rule that forbids it.
There is a second loop-hole in the CBA that I have also found, in which a player could also coach a team (This is to for those of you that thought that Doc Rivers was ignorant on the specifics of the CBA when it came to this particular rule). This 2nd loop-hole is opened when a player is a volunteer coach. A player can be a volunteer coach, and be paid as a player at the same time. A recent instance of this happening (during the current CBA) was when Aaron McKie (who was volunteer coaching in Philadelphia at the time) was used by the L.A. Lakers in the S&T deal for Pau Gasol from Memphis. Although McKie was immediately waived by the Grizzlies, he was paid for that season by Memphis (1st year is always guaranteed), as a player, but after a week in Memphis, returned to Philadelphia and continued his coaching duties, and was paid as a player at the same time.
These two loop-holes are actually related, and if the Cavaliers so chose to do so, they could technically name LeBron as the new Head Coach, as a volunteer, and still pay him as a player. The CBA specifically has a rule that is open for interpretation by the commish, that forbids a team from blatantly making any kind of deal that would circumvent the rules of the CBA. Because this would not be the case (a circumvention of the rules - the rules were put into place so the salary cap couldn't be circumvented, not so players couldn't be player-coaches. The purpose of all of the CBA rules is to maintain the salary cap, and player salaries.), therefore the instance of LeBron being named the head-coach is NOT IMPOSSIBLE! Improbable, and very unlikely.... but it is possible.
We the People...