GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- Mascot
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,482
- And1: 1,011
- Joined: May 29, 2007
- Location: Newfoundland
- Contact:
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
gonna put Okafor on the block to see what i get offered, trust me I value him MUCH more than most of you.

Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
-
nba_addict
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,890
- And1: 7
- Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Mascot wrote:gonna put Okafor on the block to see what i get offered, trust me I value him MUCH more than most of you.
I can attest to that.
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- jcldallas24
- Starter
- Posts: 2,427
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 14, 2009
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Mascot wrote:gonna put Okafor on the block to see what i get offered, trust me I value him MUCH more than most of you.
Yeah i see, considering you wanted me to give up Lopez for him...lol
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,590
- And1: 22,952
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Delonte West, TJ Ford available for an expiring reserve PF
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
-
willbsn13
- Senior
- Posts: 558
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 05, 2010
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Tyrus Thomas up for graps in a S&T for youth.
And still looking at offers for Stephen Jackson
And still looking at offers for Stephen Jackson
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- jcldallas24
- Starter
- Posts: 2,427
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 14, 2009
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Looking to deal the following for an upgrade at the PF position Boris Diaw/Leandro Barbosa/Donatas Motiejunas...Maybe even Kevin Martin or John Salmons...
juan_carlos_lopez_09@yahoo.com
juan_carlos_lopez_09@yahoo.com
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- lukekarts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,168
- And1: 336
- Joined: Dec 11, 2009
- Location: UK
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Just a question guys, how do you want this game to end? Rankings as per the rosters assembled this season?
Or do you want me to run 2011 free agency?
Or do you want me to run 2011 free agency?
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- SamBone
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,477
- And1: 4
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
lukekarts wrote:Just a question guys, how do you want this game to end? Rankings as per the rosters assembled this season?
Or do you want me to run 2011 free agency?
2011 draft is before 2011 FA, not sure many people want to draft that far ahead
2012 GMAT Christmas Edition : OKC Thunder
PG: DWill / Bayless
SG: DWade / VC / Grant Hill
SF: KD / MWP
PF: Ibaka / Landry
C : DMC / Dalembert / Kelly Olynyk
draft rites to Serey Karaey
PG: DWill / Bayless
SG: DWade / VC / Grant Hill
SF: KD / MWP
PF: Ibaka / Landry
C : DMC / Dalembert / Kelly Olynyk
draft rites to Serey Karaey
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
-
nba_addict
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,890
- And1: 7
- Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
SamBone wrote:lukekarts wrote:
2011 draft is before 2011 FA, not sure many people want to draft that far ahead
Agreed thats too far and we dont have a good picture compared to this years draft.
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,590
- And1: 22,952
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
SamBone wrote:lukekarts wrote:Just a question guys, how do you want this game to end? Rankings as per the rosters assembled this season?
Or do you want me to run 2011 free agency?
2011 draft is before 2011 FA, not sure many people want to draft that far ahead
I agree. Normally I would love doing the 2011 free agency given my team as it is. However, if we do FA, then we need to do draft, and this game would drag out even longer...
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- lukekarts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,168
- And1: 336
- Joined: Dec 11, 2009
- Location: UK
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Well given that not many people know the rookies, I would suggest we just take the mock draft from Draft Express. Our rankings will decide our picks...
But I don't mind either way, just happy to go along with the majority.
But I don't mind either way, just happy to go along with the majority.
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- Mascot
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,482
- And1: 1,011
- Joined: May 29, 2007
- Location: Newfoundland
- Contact:
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
yea just assign the players as per draftexpress I would think

Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,676
- And1: 18,179
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
The Pacers want to try and add a sixth man that is capable of scoring 15-20 points a game. I would like to trade Pietruse and some of my expiring deals to get it done.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- SamBone
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,477
- And1: 4
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
The lakers are looking to make one or 2 more moves.
Current depth chart is
PG: Billups / Fisher /Bayless /T.Allen
SG: Kobe / Bayless / T.Allen
SF: Artest / Kapono / T.Allen
PF: KG / N.Collison / Frye
CC: Nene / Frye / N.Collison
Current depth chart is
PG: Billups / Fisher /Bayless /T.Allen
SG: Kobe / Bayless / T.Allen
SF: Artest / Kapono / T.Allen
PF: KG / N.Collison / Frye
CC: Nene / Frye / N.Collison
2012 GMAT Christmas Edition : OKC Thunder
PG: DWill / Bayless
SG: DWade / VC / Grant Hill
SF: KD / MWP
PF: Ibaka / Landry
C : DMC / Dalembert / Kelly Olynyk
draft rites to Serey Karaey
PG: DWill / Bayless
SG: DWade / VC / Grant Hill
SF: KD / MWP
PF: Ibaka / Landry
C : DMC / Dalembert / Kelly Olynyk
draft rites to Serey Karaey
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,590
- And1: 22,952
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Mascot wrote:yea just assign the players as per draftexpress I would think
Isn't this the same issue we had with this year's though? If we're just going by the DX rankings, then the teams interest isn't being taken into consideration.
Trust me, I want to get to free agency as much the next guy, but not if we have to do the 2011 draft this way. (Unless, of course, the draft order is the same as this year's and I can put Harrison Barnes next to John Wall lol.)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- jcldallas24
- Starter
- Posts: 2,427
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 14, 2009
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
well a faster way would be for everybody to send a list to the commish of whom they would like to draft....about 5 players long per pick, then just post the Draft...Well i think this is the easiest way to do it, if we want to do 2011 FA.
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- SamBone
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,477
- And1: 4
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
the problem most people are overlooking is that at least half the GM's (not me) could care less about this years draft class, let alone next years filled with guys that never even played college ball yet. The next problem is the draft order. most GM's never send in rankings (on going problem for these games) and most of the ones that do send in ranking rank teams way too low (or high) to try and help themselves (commishs have been trying to fix this for the past few games) and always teams get ppissed if theirt team gets crappy rankings (i think 2 games ago mascot (Sac) but somehow ended up a lottery team because some GM's ranked him really bad not realizing his team was pretty good.
I think we should worry about successfully finishing 1 future season (and offseason) before we try to get 2 future season's done
But that is just my opinion, I am game for whatever, I just really would like to have a successful season that 75% of GM's finish and are somewhat happy with results before we jump ahead.
We finally had 1 free agent period that most teams can agree was realistic and can't complain too much about the decissions that were made
I think we should worry about successfully finishing 1 future season (and offseason) before we try to get 2 future season's done
But that is just my opinion, I am game for whatever, I just really would like to have a successful season that 75% of GM's finish and are somewhat happy with results before we jump ahead.
We finally had 1 free agent period that most teams can agree was realistic and can't complain too much about the decissions that were made
2012 GMAT Christmas Edition : OKC Thunder
PG: DWill / Bayless
SG: DWade / VC / Grant Hill
SF: KD / MWP
PF: Ibaka / Landry
C : DMC / Dalembert / Kelly Olynyk
draft rites to Serey Karaey
PG: DWill / Bayless
SG: DWade / VC / Grant Hill
SF: KD / MWP
PF: Ibaka / Landry
C : DMC / Dalembert / Kelly Olynyk
draft rites to Serey Karaey
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- lukekarts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,168
- And1: 336
- Joined: Dec 11, 2009
- Location: UK
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Let's all hold off any future plans for now and just go on trying to make some trades... and free agency signings, as there are a few guys feeling neglected!
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,590
- And1: 22,952
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
SamBone wrote:the problem most people are overlooking is that at least half the GM's (not me) could care less about this years draft class, let alone next years filled with guys that never even played college ball yet. The next problem is the draft order. most GM's never send in rankings (on going problem for these games) and most of the ones that do send in ranking rank teams way too low (or high) to try and help themselves (commishs have been trying to fix this for the past few games) and always teams get ppissed if theirt team gets crappy rankings (i think 2 games ago mascot (Sac) but somehow ended up a lottery team because some GM's ranked him really bad not realizing his team was pretty good.
I think we should worry about successfully finishing 1 future season (and offseason) before we try to get 2 future season's done
But that is just my opinion, I am game for whatever, I just really would like to have a successful season that 75% of GM's finish and are somewhat happy with results before we jump ahead.
We finally had 1 free agent period that most teams can agree was realistic and can't complain too much about the decissions that were made
This. This game has been going smoothly so far. Lets not mess it up by going too far.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
- britblazerdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,649
- And1: 1,344
- Joined: Dec 08, 2004
- Location: Nuevo México
-
Re: GM A TEAM 2010/11 Season, New Timeframe (Discussion)
Wait...the game goes all the way through the season?
To Dare Is To Do? 13 League Titles. You've only got 2.
Return to Trades and Transactions Games





