Image

getting your starting PG

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

Sebzor
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,276
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 29, 2006

getting your starting PG 

Post#1 » by Sebzor » Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:24 pm

IND-NOH trade
T. Murphy/M. Dunleavy/T. Ford/10th pick/future 2nd
-for: E. Okafor/J. Posey/P. Stojakovic/D. Collison/11th pick

select: X. Henry/J. Jordan
core:
Collison/Price
Henry/Rush
Granger
Okafor/Hansbrough
Hibbert/Jordan

NOH: save money & move up 1spot
"So, the caterpillar has emerged from its cocoon as a shark, with a gun for a mouth."
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,772
And1: 14,041
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: getting your starting PG 

Post#2 » by Scoot McGroot » Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:27 pm

If Indy's taking on Okafor, Posey, and Peja, then we're sure as heck not giving up any picks whatsoever.

In that deal, NO is giving up Collison and the 11th as the value, and Indy's giving up NO picks.
laydo
Junior
Posts: 298
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
   

Re: getting your starting PG 

Post#3 » by laydo » Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:42 pm

I don't think trading for expiring contracts is what the Hornets want. They now are trying to avoid the luxury tax in the coming season, which means they are sending their packege to the teams with big salary sapce, like the Knicks, Nets or the Mavs who have Dampier's ungarunteed contract.

So, if the Pacers want to trade, there must be another team to clear up the salary for the Hornets.
User avatar
mizzoupacers
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,120
And1: 12
Joined: May 27, 2004

Re: getting your starting PG 

Post#4 » by mizzoupacers » Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:14 pm

laydo wrote:I don't think trading for expiring contracts is what the Hornets want. They now are trying to avoid the luxury tax in the coming season, which means they are sending their packege to the teams with big salary sapce


This. Seems like the obvious solution to New Orleans' salary problem is to pawn off someone like Peja to an under-the-cap team that doesn't have to match salaries, using Collison as the bait.

Much as I like the thought of the Pacers getting Collison, I think there's little chance of it happening. The best the Pacers could do is to offer a trade which barely fits within the "salaries must match within 25%" provision, which could immediately save the Hornets several million when you are talking about contracts the size of Peja's or Okafor's. The problem, though, is that the Pacers are not in a position to take on those extra millions in salary. That's the sort of trade they might be able to do next summer, but not this summer.

I think Ty Lawson is a more realistic target.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: getting your starting PG 

Post#5 » by Wizop » Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:36 pm

I don't see the point of swapping picks in this deal unless NO thinks the Pacers are going to take the guy they want. I'd rather leave out the picks and do a separate deal with MN or OKC to move down for multiple picks.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
ardthomp
Sophomore
Posts: 233
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2009

Re: getting your starting PG 

Post#6 » by ardthomp » Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:14 pm

Wizop wrote:I don't see the point of swapping picks in this deal unless NO thinks the Pacers are going to take the guy they want. I'd rather leave out the picks and do a separate deal with MN or OKC to move down for multiple picks.


I agree
fienX420
Senior
Posts: 595
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2008

Re: getting your starting PG 

Post#7 » by fienX420 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:34 am

if we have to give up a future 2nd round pick, we better be getting chris paul.

Return to Indiana Pacers