mlhouse wrote:You can find a player like Johnson in almost every draft.
Can you back this up?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
mlhouse wrote:You can find a player like Johnson in almost every draft.
Eleqtrique wrote:mlhouse wrote:You can find a player like Johnson in almost every draft.
Can you back this up?
Klomp wrote:Breakdown777 wrote:Well we all seem pretty split, figures.
Let's just say it's due to the fact that there are so many variables and I made one lousey unspecific poll.
I think it's safe to say if we can get Turner for what MN sees as fair value, it's a done deal.
I think the same goes for Favors.
I don't think we take Cuz now that all these rumors are naysaying it, but we might end up taking him and trading down (I think this will blow up in our faces).
Just Blame the Triangle
Vindicater wrote:Eleqtrique wrote:mlhouse wrote:You can find a player like Johnson in almost every draft.
Can you back this up?
He can't, he will most likely start to name players who are similar to Johnson but with about half the talent.
mlhouse wrote:There are two in this draft alone: Paul George and Xavier Henry. I would argue that the ceiling on those players is higher than Wesley Johnson's. Wes Johnson is more NBA ready than those two, but they are younger. Both could potentially be as good of shooters, Henry could even be a better shooter than Johnson. George can create off the dribble much better than Johnson.
Vindicater wrote:mlhouse wrote:There are two in this draft alone: Paul George and Xavier Henry. I would argue that the ceiling on those players is higher than Wesley Johnson's. Wes Johnson is more NBA ready than those two, but they are younger. Both could potentially be as good of shooters, Henry could even be a better shooter than Johnson. George can create off the dribble much better than Johnson.
So why exactly is Wesley Johnson considered a top5 pick and Henry/George are considered mid teens?
Vindicater wrote:mlhouse wrote:There are two in this draft alone: Paul George and Xavier Henry. I would argue that the ceiling on those players is higher than Wesley Johnson's. Wes Johnson is more NBA ready than those two, but they are younger. Both could potentially be as good of shooters, Henry could even be a better shooter than Johnson. George can create off the dribble much better than Johnson.
So why exactly is Wesley Johnson considered a top5 pick and Henry/George are considered mid teens?
Vindicater wrote:mlhouse wrote:There are two in this draft alone: Paul George and Xavier Henry. I would argue that the ceiling on those players is higher than Wesley Johnson's. Wes Johnson is more NBA ready than those two, but they are younger. Both could potentially be as good of shooters, Henry could even be a better shooter than Johnson. George can create off the dribble much better than Johnson.
So why exactly is Wesley Johnson considered a top5 pick and Henry/George are considered mid teens?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves