jsimon wrote:
FTA: 116 Celtics
FTA: 163 Lakers
But to make up for that, the Lakers are fouling harder. Perk is out for months, Ray can't practice, Rondo gets thrown hard to the floor, etc., etc.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
jsimon wrote:
FTA: 116 Celtics
FTA: 163 Lakers
jsimon wrote:
If you watch a replay of the play Perkins was injured on it is the perfect microcosm of the entire series. Kobe shoves him in the back positioning for the rebound, no call... Bynum clobbers him over the back, no call... Only when Perkins crumbles to the ground injured does the whistle blow.
Like I said earlier, I just don't believe what I am seeing anymore. Just like after the Supreme Court elected a president 10 years ago, and has lost all credibility since, the NBA has been losing credibility with me for years, and it's all come to a head in these Finals.

chakdaddy wrote:It's hard to keep living in this world.

jsimon wrote:chakdaddy wrote:It's hard to keep living in this world.
Nodding sadly.
I hate to be so negative, but I'm going into tomorrow's game feeling as though there is virtually no chance the refs will let us win. Every run will be stymied by some bogus charge call with Kobe blatantly moving his feet, every Laker drought will be revived by phantom whistles, Kobe will get every bump, Gasol, Sasha, and Fisher will be in full flop mode and get at least half of them. The Lakers would have to lay a real egg for us to win...
John from Hemet wrote:For those whining about officiating calls......you are not getting screwed on foul calls as there have been bad calls both ways.
There are several instances of bad calls/no calls that could be pointed out on the other side....but to do that would be whining.....its just playoff basketball.

jsimon wrote:John from Hemet wrote:For those whining about officiating calls......you are not getting screwed on foul calls as there have been bad calls both ways.
There are several instances of bad calls/no calls that could be pointed out on the other side....but to do that would be whining.....its just playoff basketball.
Lets do a little quick analysis shall we.
Adjusted for intentional fouls through 6 games, the Lakers have out shot the Celtics at the stripe 163-116. That is a whopping difference. Now if you were going to make the argument that the Lakers have been going inside all series and the C's have been shooting jump shots and camping out at the 3 pt. line, you could go down that path. It would be a ludicrous argument mind you, but you could try.
How does that work exactly? If each team has had bad calls go against them, I'd say the Celtic's have had waaaayyyyyy more bad calls go against them than your team. These are the facts, and they are indisputable.
163-116.
mr_sunshine wrote:Kobe and Gasol: 93 FTAs
Pierce and Garnett: 48 FTAs
Pierce Garnett and Allen: 68 FTAs
Pierce Garnett Allen and Rondo: 85 FTAs
What is wrong with this picture? Gasol and Bryant have shot only like 25 less FTAs than our entire team....
theman wrote:FINALS POINTS IN THE PAINT
Game 1: L.A. 48, Boston 30
Game 2: Boston 36, L.A. 26*
*Not including the 25 FT attempts by Bynum/Gasol.
Game 3: Boston 50, L.A. 38
Game 4: Boston 54, L.A. 34
Game 5: Boston 46, L.A. 32
Game 6: L.A. 40, Boston 32
Total Boston 248, L.A. 218
The numbers actually show it is the Celtics who have been playing in the paint. So the jump shooting argument is obviously flawed.
Here is an interest stat. Free Throw attempts per point in the paint
Boston .47 L.A. .75
Put another way for every basket the Celtics make in the paint they average less than one trip to the foul line. On the other hand the fakers average One and a half trips to the free throw line for every basket in the paint they make.

theman wrote:jsimon wrote:John from Hemet wrote:For those whining about officiating calls......you are not getting screwed on foul calls as there have been bad calls both ways.
There are several instances of bad calls/no calls that could be pointed out on the other side....but to do that would be whining.....its just playoff basketball.
Lets do a little quick analysis shall we.
Adjusted for intentional fouls through 6 games, the Lakers have out shot the Celtics at the stripe 163-116. That is a whopping difference. Now if you were going to make the argument that the Lakers have been going inside all series and the C's have been shooting jump shots and camping out at the 3 pt. line, you could go down that path. It would be a ludicrous argument mind you, but you could try.
How does that work exactly? If each team has had bad calls go against them, I'd say the Celtic's have had waaaayyyyyy more bad calls go against them than your team. These are the facts, and they are indisputable.
163-116.
FINALS POINTS IN THE PAINT
Game 1: L.A. 48, Boston 30
Game 2: Boston 36, L.A. 26*
*Not including the 25 FT attempts by Bynum/Gasol.
Game 3: Boston 50, L.A. 38
Game 4: Boston 54, L.A. 34
Game 5: Boston 46, L.A. 32
Game 6: L.A. 40, Boston 32
Total Boston 248, L.A. 218
The numbers actually show it is the Celtics who have been playing in the paint. So the jump shooting argument is obviously flawed.
Here is an interest stat. Free Throw attempts per point in the paint
Boston .47 L.A. .75
Put another way for every basket the Celtics make in the paint they average less than one trip to the foul line. On the other hand the fakers average One and a half trips to the free throw line for every basket in the paint they make.
TonyMontana wrote: Same goes for KOBE he's basically JUST A SHOOTER.