ImageImageImage

LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

simsev23
Ballboy
Posts: 12
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2008

LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#1 » by simsev23 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:34 pm

LAC gives: Vujacic
LAC gets: Sessions
Min gives: Vujacic
MIn gets: Sessions

Why for Minny: They get a good shooter to spread the floor and also lose a year on sessions contract. Vujacic only 2 more years, sessions 3 more years.

Why for Lakers: They get a good backup point guard behind derek fisher, who can run the floor and already has 1 year running the triangle. The lakers looked like they needed a solid backup PG all throughout the playoffs and finally get it.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#2 » by Krapinsky » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:36 pm

No.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#3 » by C.lupus » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:36 pm

No.more.Sashas.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#4 » by shrink » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:38 pm

I just wrote this - I thought it might give you a handle on how MIN looks at Sessions

shrink wrote: Here's the story on Ramon Sessions.

David Kahn kind of lucked into Ramon Sessions for under market price last season. While MIN was delayed with the Rubio situation, MIL used up all its money under the lux so they couldn't re-sign Sessions, and other teams filled their PG vacancies elsewhere, expecting Sessions to cost more. By the time it was over, MIN realized it didn't have a legitimate back-up PG, and Sessions didn't have a legitimate team to go to, so he took the remainder of our MLE, and we locked him up cheap. Moreover, he fits Kahn's vision for the team, giving young players with skills the opportunity to emerge.

When the season began, Kahn was commited to trying to develop Flynn, but still tried to get Sessions minutes by using the unorthodox move of not even carrying a third PG. Sessions picked up Rambis more complicated system more quickly than Flynn last year, and there are questions of whether Flynn's talents really are a fit for this offense. Kahn has said that Flynn and Session will both be competing for the starting job this year.

I agree that before next summer, either Flynn or Sessions will have to be traded, but right now they both have a legitimate job, and a legitimate chance to raise their trade value. I think both are on good contracts, and its doubtful we'd trade either for just an expiring.


Vujacic is an overpaid expiring deal, but Sessions has three years at a good price. LAL would certainly need to offer more than Sasha to secure Sessions.

I'd try a three teamer, where you take back a worse contract and an asset for Sasha, then trade us the asset. Maybe Sasha + #1 mil in cap space + future protected 1st for Posey + NOH + #11" to get the asset, but after that, I don't know how you move the salary.
HardyForJJ
Ballboy
Posts: 13
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2010

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#5 » by HardyForJJ » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:55 pm

Why do people insist that Sessions is just a contract?

Maybe if Rubio was coming this year I would entertain a Sessions deal (not necessarily for Vujacic), but without Sessions, we really have no one to backup Flynn..
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#6 » by Basti » Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:07 pm

C.lupus wrote:No.more.Sashas.


:rofl:
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#7 » by Esohny » Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:36 pm

Ugh.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
teven_1
Rookie
Posts: 1,201
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 01, 2010

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#8 » by teven_1 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:44 pm

SESSIONS FOR THE NUMBER 10! forgive the caps.

Pacers are giving it away
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
Cyborg21
General Manager
Posts: 8,583
And1: 368
Joined: Apr 14, 2005
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Contact:
       

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#9 » by Cyborg21 » Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:59 am

"Minn gets: Sessions"?

dont we already have him?
Image
KariTakko
Ballboy
Posts: 20
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 03, 2010

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#10 » by KariTakko » Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:12 am

We can get a better return for Sessions.
User avatar
PHTown
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 26, 2010

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#11 » by PHTown » Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:28 am

Brilliant trade idea. I like the part were Minn gives up a relatively cheap pg with lower level starter potential for a douchebag who is not even close to the player he was a couple of years ago, which even then wasn't very good, and only lives to please kobe bryant(possibly orally...if you don't believe me, watch the postgame celebration from last night...awkward to say the least).
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,060
And1: 3,613
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: LAL/MIN Sessions for Vujacic 

Post#12 » by Foye » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:57 am

simsev23 wrote:LAC gives: Vujacic
LAC gets: Sessions
Min gives: Vujacic
MIn gets: Sessions

Why for Minny: They get a good shooter to spread the floor and also lose a year on sessions contract. Vujacic only 2 more years, sessions 3 more years.

Why for Lakers: They get a good backup point guard behind derek fisher, who can run the floor and already has 1 year running the triangle. The lakers looked like they needed a solid backup PG all throughout the playoffs and finally get it.


Vujacic is horrible. He would be Pavlovic 2.0

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves