Thad Young for #4 Pick

ZarcMumoff · Post #1 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:29 pm

Would Minnesota fans do this? I'm in an argument with a guy, and he thinks that Minnesota would do that trade. While I think they would laugh at it. Just want to see what you guys think. Why wouldn't you or why would you?

PeeDee · Post #2 » by **PeeDee** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:29 pm

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

ZarcMumoff · Post #3 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:31 pm

PeeDee wrote:HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

Thank you. That is what I thought.

Post #4 » by **The J Rocka** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:31 pm

He's talented but :lol:

Post #5 » by **C.lupus** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:38 pm

PeeDee wrote:HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

Krapinsky · Post #6 » by **Krapinsky** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:49 pm

Krapinsky · Post #7 » by **Krapinsky** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:50 pm

If it helps your argument, we would not trade the #16 for Thad Young,

john2jer · Post #8 » by **john2jer** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:53 pm

PK5 wrote:Would Minnesota fans do this? I'm in an argument with a guy, and he thinks that Minnesota would do that trade. While I think they would laugh at it. Just want to see what you guys think. Why wouldn't you or why would you?

Only if Philly throws in #2, some cheese steaks, and the Rocky statue.

Busch Legion · Post #9 » by **Busch Legion** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:09 pm

I like Young, but not for the 4th pick.

Tekkenlaw · Post #10 » by **Tekkenlaw** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:21 pm

The question should be Thad Young for the 23rd pick.

Esohny · Post #11 » by **Esohny** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:33 pm

Tekkenlaw wrote:The question should be Thad Young for the 23rd pick.

Phastbreak91 · Post #12 » by **Phastbreak91** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:53 pm

I think Thad Young for the #16 pick is pretty fair value. He is just about to turn 22 (Wes Johnson turning 23) and still has loads of potential, plus he is already a proven player. The 16th pick could be a bust for all we know. Only reason why I think its fair is because Young is in his contract year.

dunkonu21 · Post #13 » by **dunkonu21** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:03 pm

Agreed I'd do 16 for Thad. People here just think if a guy can't shoot he isn't worth our time. They are completely mistaken though.

Slum_Dillinger · Post #14 » by **Slum_Dillinger** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:04 pm

Phastbreak91 wrote:I think Thad Young for the #16 pick is pretty fair value. He is just about to turn 22 (Wes Johnson turning 23) and still has loads of potential, plus he is already a proven player. The 16th pick could be a bust for all we know. Only reason why I think its fair is because Young is in his contract year.

That's exactly why we wouldnt make that deal. We can get a younger, comparable talent on a brand spanking new rookie deal at #16 instead of a guy that hasnt shown me any major progression lately who is a year away from needing a new deal. I don't hate Thad, but if the price is the 16, I'll gladly be "stuck" with a George/Henry.

ZarcMumoff · Post #15 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:08 pm

Thanks for the answers guys. Just what I expected.

shrink · Post #16 » by **shrink** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:34 pm

Thad Young becomes an RFA next year, so I wouldn't give the #16, and maybe not even the #23.

I don't think there's much upside. If he gets worse, its a bad deal. If he stays the same, then we are faced with a dilemma on what to pay him, and the same goes if he was to improve. If we're going to pay market in a year, and next year he's not making our season anyway, why give up anything for him? I'll keep the picks. Give me four long years of rookie scale on a guy that may or may not succeed.

Wingman · Post #17 » by **Wingman** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:03 pm

I'd do 16 for thad for sure.

corwin · Post #18 » by **corwin** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:28 pm

Thad is being grossly underestimated as a player. One down year with EJ does not mean he does not have starter potential. I'd prefer to keep him this year & see what he can do. The fact that he will be a RFA is a negative & clearly he is not worth #4 but there are no guarantees that #16 will ever be more than a role player/scrub either. Philly grabbed Rodney Carney with #16. You've seen how that worked out. #23 on the other hand is a clear crap shoot. That's the pick Philly gave to Minnesota to get rid of KK so that we'd have a chance to sign Brand. Don't see that as having any real value.

funkatron101 · Post #19 » by **funkatron101** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:44 pm

corwin wrote:Thad is being grossly underestimated as a player. One down year with EJ does not mean he does not have starter potential. I'd prefer to keep him this year & see what he can do. The fact that he will be a RFA is a negative & clearly he is not worth #4 but there are no guarantees that #16 will ever be more than a role player/scrub either. Philly grabbed Rodney Carney with #16. You've seen how that worked out. #23 on the other hand is a clear crap shoot. That's the pick Philly gave to Minnesota to get rid of KK so that we'd have a chance to sign Brand. Don't see that as having any real value.

We also have Brewer, who is very similar in production, a very good chance at signing Wes Johnson, Love and Jefferson. He doesn't seem much of an upgrade to any of those guys. Whether he is a SF or PF. Which seems unclear at this point.

Esohny · Post #20 » by **Esohny** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:51 pm

funkatron101 wrote:We also have Brewer, who is very similar in production, a very good chance at signing Wes Johnson, Love and Jefferson. He doesn't seem much of an upgrade to any of those guys. Whether he is a SF or PF. Which seems unclear at this point.

Agreed. He isn't an upgrade to any of those players.