ImageImageImage

MIN rejects #10 for Flynn

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#81 » by shangrila » Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:58 am

GopherIt! wrote:
Klomp wrote:Is this the same person as the one Marko had a baby with and "claims" to be married to?


No, that's Helga your thinking of. This girl's name is Regina. At least I think that was her name (I was kinda tipsy at the time.)

It's Alyse. If you're all going to cheat with my imaginary girlfriend the least you could do is get her name right.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#82 » by shrink » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:27 am

shangrila wrote:
GopherIt! wrote:
Klomp wrote:Is this the same person as the one Marko had a baby with and "claims" to be married to?


No, that's Helga your thinking of. This girl's name is Regina. At least I think that was her name (I was kinda tipsy at the time.)

It's Alyse. If you're all going to cheat with my imaginary girlfriend the least you could do is get her name right.


Imaginary girlfriends don't mind if you forget their names
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#83 » by shangrila » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:38 am

shrink wrote:
shangrila wrote:
GopherIt! wrote:No, that's Helga your thinking of. This girl's name is Regina. At least I think that was her name (I was kinda tipsy at the time.)

It's Alyse. If you're all going to cheat with my imaginary girlfriend the least you could do is get her name right.


Imaginary girlfriends don't mind if you forget their names

I imagine mine would
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#84 » by TrentTuckerForever » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:42 pm

MattyP wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:I still think there is alot of bad blood between Kahn, Woj, and Indiana over Indy leaking the Al for Granger offer last winter. In other words Woj is not getting anything at all out of Kahn and is pissed about it.

So my theory is that Kahn leaked Indy's offer of 10 for Flynn to their beat writer today after negotiations for Granger went nowhere, and Woj practiced horrible journalism by publishing only a portion of our offer for Granger and omitting that Granger was involved in the offer.

I don't know what went on while Kahn was in Indy, maybe there is bad blood there. Although personnel wise we are good trading partners, I don't know how both teams are going to think they got a fair shake, especially with guys like granger involved.
Flynn+4 for Granger+10 is a pretty fair deal, allows Indy to rebuild with Flynn+Cousins.

If Kahn thinks he can get a starting caliber wing at 10, and he shot down flynn for 10 without a second thought, he's either got a better deal already worked out to get into that range or he is an utter fool who is overly enamored with a guy he drafted because he is one of "his guys".

I have a very hard time seeing Flynn going earlier than 10 in this draft.


Yeah, I just posted in that Woj thread:
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=1021464&p=23836748#p23836748

johnj2er wrote:Woj and Kahn have an on-going feud since like December. Woj tried to break a rumor, I believe the Granger/Jefferson bit, and Kahn felt betrayed by Woj. Since then the Wolves have pretty much refused to even talk to Woj. It's quite obvious since then that Woj takes nothing but shots at the Wolves, especially Kahn.


From Rubechat.


This makes a ton of sense. Thursday can't get here quick enough.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
MNRunLeft
Starter
Posts: 2,237
And1: 410
Joined: Jun 18, 2010
       

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#85 » by MNRunLeft » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:47 pm

Bleacher Report is saying that Granger is part of the package that Woj reported. If Kahn pulled off Flynn, 16 and 23 for Granger and 10 I'd be amazed and it would be a steal for the Wolves who could then grab Cousins or Favors at 4 and Henry or George at 10 or potentially package 4 and 10 to move up to get Turner if they really love him.

Links:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/4095 ... ny-granger
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#86 » by funkatron101 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:49 pm

MNRunLeft wrote:Bleacher Report is saying that Granger is part of the package that Woj reported. If Kahn pulled off Flynn, 16 and 23 for Granger and 10 I'd be amazed and it would be a steal for the Wolves who could then grab Cousins or Favors at 4 and Henry or George at 10 or potentially package 4 and 10 to move up to get Turner if they really love him.

Links:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/4095 ... ny-granger

But it's the bleacher report...Come on.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
MNRunLeft
Starter
Posts: 2,237
And1: 410
Joined: Jun 18, 2010
       

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#87 » by MNRunLeft » Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:04 pm

funkatron101 wrote:
MNRunLeft wrote:Bleacher Report is saying that Granger is part of the package that Woj reported. If Kahn pulled off Flynn, 16 and 23 for Granger and 10 I'd be amazed and it would be a steal for the Wolves who could then grab Cousins or Favors at 4 and Henry or George at 10 or potentially package 4 and 10 to move up to get Turner if they really love him.

Links:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/4095 ... ny-granger

But it's the bleacher report...Come on.


I know but figured it was worth mentioning, if Woj's report has any truth to it Granger would seemingly be the only "package" item that would seem to fit the package the Wolves seemingly offered. If the Wolves turned down Flynn for 10 I don't know what else would make the Pacers turn down Flynn, 16 and 23 for 10 and something.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#88 » by Esohny » Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:08 pm

MNRunLeft wrote:
funkatron101 wrote:
MNRunLeft wrote:Bleacher Report is saying that Granger is part of the package that Woj reported. If Kahn pulled off Flynn, 16 and 23 for Granger and 10 I'd be amazed and it would be a steal for the Wolves who could then grab Cousins or Favors at 4 and Henry or George at 10 or potentially package 4 and 10 to move up to get Turner if they really love him.

Links:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/4095 ... ny-granger

But it's the bleacher report...Come on.


I know but figured it was worth mentioning, if Woj's report has any truth to it Granger would seemingly be the only "package" item that would seem to fit the package the Wolves seemingly offered. If the Wolves turned down Flynn for 10 I don't know what else would make the Pacers turn down Flynn, 16 and 23 for 10 and something.


We'd almost have to be taking on a bad contract in addition to Granger and 10 in a deal like that. So you'd probably have to include at a Gomes for Ford swap at least (I didn't bother matching salary exactly, because I don't see this happening).
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#89 » by moss_is_1 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:13 pm

Esohny wrote:
I know but figured it was worth mentioning, if Woj's report has any truth to it Granger would seemingly be the only "package" item that would seem to fit the package the Wolves seemingly offered. If the Wolves turned down Flynn for 10 I don't know what else would make the Pacers turn down Flynn, 16 and 23 for 10 and something.


We'd almost have to be taking on a bad contract in addition to Granger and 10 in a deal like that. So you'd probably have to include at a Gomes for Ford swap at least (I didn't bother matching salary exactly, because I don't see this happening).[/quote]
Well all of their bad contracts aren't that bad, they are expiring so that'd be fine with me. It'd be really nice to get #10 with Granger(not gonna happen I'm sure).
Rubio-Sessions
#10(Henry-George)-Ellington
Granger-Brewer
Al-Love
Darko-Hollins
Sex
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#90 » by prefuse73 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:06 pm

yeah I was thinking

Flynn / Gomes / Brewer / 16 / 23 for Granger / Ford / #10
#4 #10 For #2
Big Al for Prince / #7

draft Turner/George

Darko - Pekovic - Hollins
Love - Granger
Granger - Prince
Turner - George - Ellington
sessions - Turner - Ford

hmmm
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#91 » by shrink » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:32 pm

shrink wrote:
shangrila wrote: It's Alyse. If you're all going to cheat with my imaginary girlfriend the least you could do is get her name right.


Imaginary girlfriends don't mind if you forget their names


.. or their birthdays
pacersrule08
Banned User
Posts: 470
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 31, 2009

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#92 » by pacersrule08 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:35 pm

prefuse73 wrote:Flynn / Gomes / Brewer / 16 / 23 for Granger / Ford / #10

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,765
And1: 22,344
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: MIN rejects #10 for Flynn 

Post#93 » by Klomp » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:37 pm

Kahn was asked by my buddy when the last time the Wolves had talked to Indiana was. He said it was a week ago when when Indiana offered #10 for Flynn and were soundly rejected. Kahn wasn't even the one who talked to them (my guess is Ronzone.)

So, Adrian W. over Yahoo is full of a boat load of feces, and I think we can pretty much dismiss anything he writes going forward.

We can also probably stop dreaming up Danny Granger trade scenarios.

http://www.canishoopus.com/2010/6/22/15 ... -can-share
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
MinnFanMan
Freshman
Posts: 72
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: wolves turn down pacers trade offer 

Post#94 » by MinnFanMan » Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:00 am

T-Wolves turn down Pacers offer of the 10th pick for PG Jonny Flynn.


This news just broke about 20 minutes ago that the Indiana Pacers and the Oklahoma City Thunder are in serious conversations about a trade that would send Eric Maynor, the 18th pick, and the 21st pick to the Indiana Pacers for the 10th overall pick in the NBA Draft.

looks like #10 might be off the list of possible trades.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: wolves turn down pacers trade offer 

Post#95 » by shrink » Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:09 am

MinnFanMan wrote:
T-Wolves turn down Pacers offer of the 10th pick for PG Jonny Flynn.


This news just broke about 20 minutes ago that the Indiana Pacers and the Oklahoma City Thunder are in serious conversations about a trade that would send Eric Maynor, the 18th pick, and the 21st pick to the Indiana Pacers for the 10th overall pick in the NBA Draft.

looks like #10 might be off the list of possible trades.


I hope we suggested Sessions + Gomes + #23 for TJ Ford + #10.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves