fishercob wrote:Have you and Dat met up to perform "Ebony and Ivory" at a karaoke night in Columbus yet? This has to happen.
Oh damn.
Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
fishercob wrote:Have you and Dat met up to perform "Ebony and Ivory" at a karaoke night in Columbus yet? This has to happen.
fishercob wrote:Have you and Dat met up to perform "Ebony and Ivory" at a karaoke night in Columbus yet? This has to happen.

WizStorm wrote:
What is the reason behind this change of mindset now about Gil's game? Is it just because the Wizards were forced to put the ball in Gil's hands in the recent past, pairing him with woeful ball-handlers (like Randy Foye) and with guys with little defensive skills and didn't have the flexibility to guard the tougher opposing guard (like Randy Foye)? Just because Gil was forced to play with the ball in his hands in recent years, doesn't mean that being the lone ball-dominant guard is where he is most effective.
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               fishercob wrote:Have you and Dat met up to perform "Ebony and Ivory" at a karaoke night in Columbus yet? This has to happen.

                                                                         
                                  
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               
Fair enough. Personally I don't consider a guy that just pounds the ball into a floor a good ball-handler. Sure he could control the dribble adequately, but just never went anywhere with it. I'm talking more about a player that can actually run the offense and allow Gil play off the ball for long stretches of time.Kanyewest wrote:WizStorm wrote:
What is the reason behind this change of mindset now about Gil's game? Is it just because the Wizards were forced to put the ball in Gil's hands in the recent past, pairing him with woeful ball-handlers (like Randy Foye) and with guys with little defensive skills and didn't have the flexibility to guard the tougher opposing guard (like Randy Foye)? Just because Gil was forced to play with the ball in his hands in recent years, doesn't mean that being the lone ball-dominant guard is where he is most effective.
I disagree with the first notion that Foye is someone who is a "woeful ball handler". He has a pretty good handle IMO although I would say he isn't a great enough decision maker at this point of his career (although I do think he would alright in a 2 guard offense). I do agree with your second point though that Foye was unable to guard the tougher defensive assignments, which is something John Wall can do w. Still, I wouldn't even call an Arenas/Foye backcourt a failure for spot up minutes given that Saunders rarely seemed to play the two of them together.
WizStorm wrote:Fair enough. Personally I don't consider a guy that just pounds the ball into a floor a good ball-handler. Sure he could control the dribble adequately, but just never went anywhere with it. I'm talking more about a player that can actually run the offense and allow Gil play off the ball for long stretches of time.

                   
                   
                   
                                                    BruceO wrote:Quick question with vince possibly expiring soon, not sure when he's off the books but someone mentioned 4mill buy out which i don't know either way about, could we theoretically trade with orlando for vince using arenas. Send Arenas to Orlando, Send vince to Minnesota which may be trying to get rid of Al jefferson and possibly sweeten ( or not) in order to get the pick as well. So orlando gets Arenas, we get Al jefferson and possibly favors or cousins and Minnesota get Vince plus whatever else we may or may not need to throw in.
cdouglas wrote:WizarDynasty wrote:What was the chemistry like when arenas played with hughes and how will this chemistry be any different than with.
Wall is everything...and I mean almost identical to highes except that he is way more explosive. Both were long slasher with iffy jumpshots. Wall is longer than arenas...
gil's ability to theive next to hughes should alleve any fears of his chemistry with wall. I would love for some to break down the differences between hughes and wall.
Viewing videos of Wall, he is definitely a better finisher than Hughes. If Arenas, Wall and Blatche would spend the summer creating some chemistry, oh this team will be one to reckon with. We know how good a passer Blatche is.
Ruzious wrote:Actually, the player getting bashed here is VC. The funny thing is - last offseason, there were a dozen posters here pulling for trades to bring VC here, and I was practically by myself saying it would be foolish to trade for him. And now, there doesn't seem to be any pro VC posters. And the real irony is - it would be an absolutely great trade for the Wiz to trade Arenas for VC. It won't happen only because Orlando would be crazy to do it (because of money - a little matter of roughly $60 mil).
Dat2U wrote:Oh and I pass on Arenas for VC. It's not horrible but I don't like it. I don't get a good feeling from it. I think Arenas would terrorize us in our divison for the next four years.
I'm not totally against dumping Gil eventually but I honestly am intrigued enough to want to see how a Wall/Arenas backcourt would shake out. After two years of watching the likes of Mike James, Dom McGuire, Earl Boykins, Javaris Crittenton etc start in the backcourt for us, I figure at minimum the franchise owes us at least a chance to see what Wall & Arenas could do together.
                   
                   
                                                                      LyricalRico wrote:BruceO wrote:Quick question with vince possibly expiring soon, not sure when he's off the books but someone mentioned 4mill buy out which i don't know either way about, could we theoretically trade with orlando for vince using arenas. Send Arenas to Orlando, Send vince to Minnesota which may be trying to get rid of Al jefferson and possibly sweeten ( or not) in order to get the pick as well. So orlando gets Arenas, we get Al jefferson and possibly favors or cousins and Minnesota get Vince plus whatever else we may or may not need to throw in.
Decent idea. I was also thinking we might be able to buyout Vince on the cheap since he'd definitely be able to get at least the MLE on the open market, if not more. That would translate into instant savings and maybe we can even get him to give up the $4M he's guaranteed next year.

Those wondering how Wall/Hinrich/Arenas fit, don't. Arenas will be elsewhere by Oct. Hinrich was great supporting DRose, will be here, too.
on Arenas: there have been all sorts of supposedly unmovable contracts. All of which have been moved. There's no such thing.
And just for clarification: that's opinion on Arenas being moved. I know there are interested teams, that's all. Will say more when able.


nate33 wrote:I think Arenas for Curry makes a lot more sense at this juncture. NY is going to need a star like Arenas, and they'll have the cap room to absorb the salary differential. NY could start next season with Arenas, Amare and Lee (assuming they strike out with Lebron, Wade and Bosh).
If we trade for Curry, we save $6M instantly and owe nothing at all next year.
WizStorm wrote:Don't strain yourself too much reading those tea leaves.