ImageImageImageImageImage

Hinrich and the #17?!?!

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

jeffjtk1234
Starter
Posts: 2,241
And1: 408
Joined: Jan 01, 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     

Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#1 » by jeffjtk1234 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:51 pm

Bucher:

"Since it's a good-faith deal for the time being, there remains a chance it could fall apart. But according to one source, the Sacramento Kings are prepared to make a similar deal with the Bulls in the Wizards' stead if that were to happen."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2010 ... id=5324240
User avatar
down_el_road
Senior
Posts: 588
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
Location: Somewhere in Europe.

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#2 » by down_el_road » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:56 pm

Im just curious on what we would give up for that...Fransisco?
User avatar
Sacramento_King
Rookie
Posts: 1,144
And1: 79
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#3 » by Sacramento_King » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:59 pm

Trade exception most likely. I don't think the Bulls want any salary back. Why do the Wizards want another point? Wall, Arenas and Kirk. I also dont understand why we just didnt get Cook and the 18th. Cheaper and only one spot back
User avatar
perezident
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,823
And1: 73
Joined: Mar 12, 2009
Location: On the beautiful island of the Bahamas. Where I was born
       

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#4 » by perezident » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:00 pm

Guys we have the Draft thread open up..all things draft now goes there.. Thanks
User avatar
SacTownKings4Life
Starter
Posts: 2,276
And1: 118
Joined: Jan 18, 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#5 » by SacTownKings4Life » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:07 pm

jeffjtk1234 wrote:Bucher:

"Since it's a good-faith deal for the time being, there remains a chance it could fall apart. But according to one source, the Sacramento Kings are prepared to make a similar deal with the Bulls in the Wizards' stead if that were to happen."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2010 ... id=5324240


For Beno? Done.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#6 » by _SRV_ » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:17 pm

It's for trade exception, and I'm not sure why we do it, #17 is not worth taking on 17 million $ contract.
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#7 » by dozencousins » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:33 pm

I doubt the KINGS end up being the trade partner with the BULLS but if they were i am confident we trade either beno or garcia & we absorbe the rest of the difference salary wise !
Krimzen
Sophomore
Posts: 152
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 01, 2008
       

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#8 » by Krimzen » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:34 pm

_SRV_ wrote:It's for trade exception, and I'm not sure why we do it, #17 is not worth taking on 17 million $ contract.

You do it if there is a player at that spot you really like. Maybe go after a young player like Avery Bradley that could develop into a long-term option next to 'Reke.

They could always reach a buyout or simply sit on his contract and then try to trade him once he becomes an expiring contract. Or this may free them to find a taker via trade for one of Udrih or Garcia.

bdgking wrote:I doubt the KINGS end up being the trade partner with the BULLS but if they were i am confident we trade either beno or garcia & we absorbe the rest of the difference salary wise !

No, the only reason the Bulls are interested in this sort of deal at all is to drop enough salary to be able to offer two max contracts. I don't think the salary difference with them taking back either of those contracts would be enough.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: Hinrich and the #17?!?! 

Post#9 » by ICMTM » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:44 pm

Use the Draft thread!

Return to Sacramento Kings