Beasly for Gomes happening?!

Howler21 · Post #1 » by **Howler21** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:06 pm

Gen board has a thread up about this possibly going down. Per a Miami blogger so take it for what its worth.

Howler21 · Post #2 » by **Howler21** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:06 pm

And i forgot the e in SUPERCOOL............

moss_is_1 · Post #3 » by **moss_is_1** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:07 pm

Meh, if he can play sf that's fine, but we are pry getting one in the draft. He certainly has potential, and we aren't giving up much. Too bad we can't get a pick from them, f-ing Thunder.

Post #4 » by **revprodeji** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:14 pm

We likely are not going to draw a top-notch FA so we need to use the cap to take risks. This is a risk.

younggunsmn · Post #5 » by **younggunsmn** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:17 pm

revprodeji wrote:We likely are not going to draw a top-notch FA so we need to use the cap to take risks. This is a risk.

You know something?

Post #6 » by **The J Rocka** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:17 pm

revprodeji wrote:We likely are not going to draw a top-notch FA so we need to use the cap to take risks. This is a risk.

As much as I think Beasley won't help us, it's worth a shot. What do we to lose anyways?

Krapinsky · Post #7 » by **Krapinsky** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:18 pm

I very much doubt this.

prefuse73 · Post #8 » by **prefuse73** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:28 pm

I would hold off on this until after the draft (since miami doesn't have another pick) and see if gomes can be apart of deal that gets us George.

otherwise, its worth the risk. He can be a 3/4 guy off the bench and take over Love's roll as 6th man.

shangrila · Post #9 » by **shangrila** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:31 pm

Yeah I don't understand why Gomes is involved. Why wouldn't they just agree to Beasley for a heavily protected 2nd rounder and do it after July 1st?

Post #10 » by **revprodeji** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:37 pm

Our involvement is hypothetical. Miami is begging anyone to take him right now.

shrink · Post #11 » by **shrink** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:38 pm

shangrila wrote:Yeah I don't understand why Gomes is involved. Why wouldn't they just agree to Beasley for a heavily protected 2nd rounder and do it after July 1st?

they want that money in hand now, so they can tell the free agents "Here it is!" The key for them is to get in front of CHI, and the Bulls might find they have to find the right bidder to get the cap space to move Deng.

Obviously better for us, losing Gomes long-term debt.

Esohny · Post #12 » by **Esohny** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:40 pm

If Kahn is scared off by Cousins (I'm still not sure if he is), it wouldn't make sense to take on Beasley, who is a far greater risk IMO.

Meh. I wouldn't HATE this, especially if we're just giving them Gomes and not hurting our cap situation. I depends on what else we're doing, as well.

shrink · Post #13 » by **shrink** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:41 pm

I'm lukewarm on this deal.

I don't have a whole lot of faith that Beasley is going to become something. On the other hand, rev is right -- we need to make some bets on some high-upside players, and cross our fingers.

dunkonu21 · Post #14 » by **dunkonu21** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:42 pm

HEATindaHouse · Post #15 » by **HEATindaHouse** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:43 pm

shrink wrote:I'm lukewarm on this deal.

I don't have a whole lot of faith that Beasley is going to become something. On the other hand, rev is right -- we need to make some bets on some high-upside players, and cross our fingers.

WTF
THE DUDES avg 15ppg in F*****,NBA lol

stop it please

Krapinsky · Post #16 » by **Krapinsky** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:50 pm

HEATindaHouse wrote:
shrink wrote:I'm lukewarm on this deal.

I don't have a whole lot of faith that Beasley is going to become something. On the other hand, rev is right -- we need to make some bets on some high-upside players, and cross our fingers.

WTF
THE DUDES avg 15ppg in F*****,NBA lol

stop it please

So did Ricky Davis. Yet somehow he made every team he joined a little worse for wear.

HEATindaHouse · Post #17 » by **HEATindaHouse** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:54 pm

Krapinsky wrote:
HEATindaHouse wrote:
shrink wrote:I'm lukewarm on this deal.

I don't have a whole lot of faith that Beasley is going to become something. On the other hand, rev is right -- we need to make some bets on some high-upside players, and cross our fingers.

WTF
THE DUDES avg 15ppg in F*****,NBA lol

stop it please

So did Ricky Davis. Yet somehow he made every team he joined a little worse for wear.

damn great point..lol

but Beasley is just getting a raw deal in miami

But I 'm a heat fan this is the right move

shangrila · Post #18 » by **shangrila** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:57 pm

I agree Beasley is getting a raw deal. I found an article the other day where someone went through all the different situations and found Beasley averaged around 20-10 when Haslem wasn't there (or in other words, the threat of getting yanked) so he's definitely got talent that isn't quite being used right.

But after his comments to Pullen I also get the feeling why they don't run plays for him and what not, so it's kind of a double edged sword. I'd take him and see what you can get out of him since I still think he could be an Antwan Jamison type player in his prime but I wouldn't go out of the way to acquire the guy.

4ho5ive · Post #19 » by **4ho5ive** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:00 pm

HEATindaHouse wrote:
shrink wrote:I'm lukewarm on this deal.

I don't have a whole lot of faith that Beasley is going to become something. On the other hand, rev is right -- we need to make some bets on some high-upside players, and cross our fingers.

WTF
THE DUDES avg 15ppg in F*****,NBA lol

stop it please

As did Rashad McCants

dunkonu21 · Post #20 » by **dunkonu21** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:01 pm

I'm SOOO sick of Gomes. swear to that Lion in Narnia.