DWill_daShizzle wrote:Sorry to break it to you, but #9 pick isnt a slam dunk. Its between "can't miss" and "got lucky" if the player turns out great. The Jazz had a desperate need, but all the skilled big men were off the board by the time #9 was up. And dont cry about Davis of UNC. That dude has hardly played and nobody knows much about him...much riskier pick.
Yes, I'm aware that the 9th pick is not assured of greatness, or even decentness. I'm saying that a hard-working, Sloan-type player can be selected later in the draft. It's not an efficient selection. I would much rather have Quincy Pondexter than Hayward.