Post#70 » by Breakdown777 » Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:51 am
I'm down on Webster. I'm not big on rhythm players and inconsistancy. But if he plays D, it's still a +.
The thing that bugs me is Kahn and Co. say all this stuff to butter up a less-than-stellar draft, but if we to make a big move in FA, half of the stuff they say becomes obsolete.
For instance, "Webster works well when given big minutes" - What if we get an All Star level gaurd to play with Wes Snipes, and Webster is downgraded to 15-20 minutes off the bench?
I like this team now, I just have a feeling that many of the positives I'm looking at (lots of high ceiling Euro talent, perimeter D, shooting, athletisim, and toughness) Will be moved before training camp in an effort to get a #1 or #2.
That being said, I still believe the team next year will be much more athletic, tough, and defensive.
I think Jonny and Wes are going to have amazing chemisty. They were really close friend and 'cuse, and you don't get that kind of comradery in 23 year old 1st/2nd year players often.
Love torches next year. All Darko has to do is NOT BUST, and play D (he's always been able to do at least that). That leaves Sessions, Brewer, Webster, and Hayward. Hopefully Brew sticks around, and we get a more complementary PG, but I don't see many reasons to be cursing Kahn into oblivion. Right now, before FA, I think this team will do what Memphis did in 2009-2010. There is more pressure to win, another year in a system with more complementary and well fitting pieces, more defense. It's a good step forward. It could've been better, but it's okay.
And I think passing on guys who everyone passed on (Alabi, Whiteside, etc.) means that they were overvalued (at least one will be a Deandre jordan like value though-its just tough to know which one), and that the FO see's Darko as the answer to most of those problems. I'm not 100% a believer in that, but I understand the reasoning behind it and hope it works out.