ImageImage

Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,261
And1: 4,581
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#21 » by raferfenix » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:14 pm

Ridnour or Blake would make sense for the Lakers, as they won't be caring about developing young talent vs Kobe accomplishing a double three peat.

Whether Fisher retires or not is irrelevant, as clearly they need a starting caliber guard to play some big minutes for them. Ridnour made no peeps about coming off the bench this year, and even played well at SG, so sadly he does seem like a great fit there...

Anyways, are there any opinions on Jordan Farmar---I like his defensive intensity and athleticism, and didn't he play with Mbah a Moute at UCLA?
GrandAdmiralDan
RealGM
Posts: 15,164
And1: 1,454
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: New Berlin, WI (Milwaukee)
Contact:
     

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#22 » by GrandAdmiralDan » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:14 pm

BucksRUS wrote:My mistake. The Lakers have early Bird rights on Brown, so they would have to use the MLE to re-sign him. They used their BAE last year to sign him.


Just to clarify, I'm certain he meant to type "wouldn't" or "would not" there instead of would.

The Lakers can use the EBE to sign Brown and would not be using any of their MLE to sign Brown.
97-98
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,604
And1: 11,609
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#23 » by Turk Nowitzki » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:15 pm

I will go on record that if Ridnour signs elsewhere, we will regret the fact that he's not around next season.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#24 » by wichmae » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:15 pm

raferfenix wrote:Ridnour or Blake would make sense for the Lakers, as they won't be caring about developing young talent vs Kobe accomplishing a double three peat.

Whether Fisher retires or not is irrelevant, as clearly they need a starting caliber guard to play some big minutes for them. Ridnour made no peeps about coming off the bench this year, and even played well at SG, so sadly he does seem like a great fit there...

Anyways, are there any opinions on Jordan Farmar---I like his defensive intensity and athleticism, and didn't he play with Mbah a Moute at UCLA?

He did but rumors are he is looking for a starting gig...
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#25 » by europa » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:19 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:I will go on record that if Ridnour signs elsewhere, we will regret the fact that he's not around next season.


I'd like to keep him because he's a solid PG, a quality veteran presence and very coachable. What concerns me is that his FG% was way above his career norm. So if there's a player on this team who could suffer a major regression it's probably Ridnour with Delfino a close second. I also hope the backup PG is only playing about 10-12 minutes per game because I'm hoping Jennings can improve and the options at SG will be stronger. So while I value what Ridnour brings and I'm fine with re-signing him I don't want to see the Bucks overpay for a player whose role (hopefully) will diminish next season.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#26 » by wichmae » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:23 pm

europa wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:I will go on record that if Ridnour signs elsewhere, we will regret the fact that he's not around next season.


I'd like to keep him because he's a solid PG, a quality veteran presence and very coachable. What concerns me is that his FG% was way above his career norm. So if there's a player on this team who could suffer a major regression it's probably Ridnour with Delfino a close second. I also hope the backup PG is only playing about 10-12 minutes per game because I'm hoping Jennings can improve and the options at SG will be stronger. So while I value what Ridnour brings and I'm fine with re-signing him I don't want to see the Bucks overpay for a player whose role (hopefully) will diminish next season.

I actually completely agree with this. i think the type of player they should target is a bigger point who has the ability to play off the ball for a shorter term type of contract. A type of veteran who would have no issues coming in being that type of player.
Big Mokeski
Sophomore
Posts: 117
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#27 » by Big Mokeski » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:24 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:I will go on record that if Ridnour signs elsewhere, we will regret the fact that he's not around next season.


We will not regret passing up the opportunity to overpay him as a backup who is likely to decline next year.
BucksRUS
Analyst
Posts: 3,159
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 16, 2009
Location: In the Snow.

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#28 » by BucksRUS » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:24 pm

wichmae wrote: I actually completely agree with this. i think the type of player they should target is a bigger point who has the ability to play off the ball for a shorter term type of contract. A type of veteran who would have no issues coming in being that type of player.


Such as Kenyon Dooling....
Trade S. Jackson soon. NJ seems like a nice place for him.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#29 » by wichmae » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:26 pm

BucksRUS wrote:
wichmae wrote: I actually completely agree with this. i think the type of player they should target is a bigger point who has the ability to play off the ball for a shorter term type of contract. A type of veteran who would have no issues coming in being that type of player.


Such as Kenyon Dooling....

Eh. Not so sure on that one. I think he would be in the mix but not at the top of the list...
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#30 » by europa » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:30 pm

wichmae wrote:
europa wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:I will go on record that if Ridnour signs elsewhere, we will regret the fact that he's not around next season.


I'd like to keep him because he's a solid PG, a quality veteran presence and very coachable. What concerns me is that his FG% was way above his career norm. So if there's a player on this team who could suffer a major regression it's probably Ridnour with Delfino a close second. I also hope the backup PG is only playing about 10-12 minutes per game because I'm hoping Jennings can improve and the options at SG will be stronger. So while I value what Ridnour brings and I'm fine with re-signing him I don't want to see the Bucks overpay for a player whose role (hopefully) will diminish next season.

I actually completely agree with this.


You sound surprised you'd agree with me. ;)
Nothing will not break me.
Captain Erv
General Manager
Posts: 8,119
And1: 78
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#31 » by Captain Erv » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:32 pm

Market is pretty slim for backup point guards:

Anthony Carter
CJ Watson
Kyle Lowry (R)
Luther Head
Earl Watson
Steve Blake
Jordan Farmar (R)
Jamaal Tinsley
Rafer Alston
Carlos Arroyo
Royal Ivey
Chris Duhon
Kevin Ollie
Anthony Johnson
Jason Williams
Travis Diener
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,261
And1: 4,581
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#32 » by raferfenix » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:32 pm

I'd like a better defender than Ridnour, but Luke's shooting really helped us this past year.

Not high on small ball with any undersized guard, so hoping we can have more of a change-of-pace PG that brings elements to the court that Jennings can't----along with some veteran moxie.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,270
And1: 27,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#33 » by trwi7 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:34 pm

Yep, backup list is very small. Ridnour is my first choice, but I wouldn't pay him more than $4 million for a couple years.

Would probably then move on to Dooling and Watson. Then Farmar and Duhon. After that there's nothing.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,143
And1: 41,679
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#34 » by emunney » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:40 pm

Captain Erv wrote:Market is pretty slim for backup point guards:

Anthony Carter
CJ Watson
Kyle Lowry (R)
Luther Head
Earl Watson
Steve Blake
Jordan Farmar (R)
Jamaal Tinsley
Rafer Alston
Carlos Arroyo
Royal Ivey
Chris Duhon
Kevin Ollie
Anthony Johnson
Jason Williams
Travis Diener


I don't see the great Acie Law on that list.

Actually, I'd rather have Acie Law than a lot of those guys.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,784
And1: 6,993
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#35 » by LUKE23 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:40 pm

I'm not a big fan but is Foye a FA?
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,270
And1: 27,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#36 » by trwi7 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:42 pm

LUKE23 wrote:I'm not a big fan but is Foye a FA?


Restricted.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,604
And1: 11,609
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#37 » by Turk Nowitzki » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:42 pm

I just think that Ridnour was so damn valuable in those games where Jennings couldn't buy a basket. I'd rather have Ridnour over any of those guys on the list of FA's and it isn't even close.
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,710
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#38 » by EastSideBucksFan » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:52 pm

I'd be shocked to see Fisher leave the Lakers

Can't believe the Lakers would be looking at Ridnour as their starter, only a replacement to Farmar.
User avatar
TurkishThunder
Senior
Posts: 741
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#39 » by TurkishThunder » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:53 pm

Dooling is gonna be outta the league in 3 years because of a degenerative hip condition
Host of this little podcast called the Buckscast.
http://www.buckscast.podomatic.com
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,261
And1: 4,581
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Chris Sheridan: Lakers Could Pursue Ridnour With ML 

Post#40 » by raferfenix » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:54 pm

If we let Ridnour walk, do we have more money to allocate per year to Salmons?

We all seem to be in agreement that paying him more per year rather than more years would be preferable...

Return to Milwaukee Bucks