DEEP3CL wrote:Yeah really.......difference was they were much better players. Gomes is garbage, you guys have to stop going goo goo gaa gaa over every guy that's thrown to the streets. The reason's I listed is proof enough he's not worth the time. He's a lesser killed version of Ron, plus he's too inconsistent and doesn't do any one thing great.tkb wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:Dude is spotty, wildly inconsistent and is limited offensively. If the Blazers don't need him or feels he can help them.........why the hell should we pick up scraps ?
Let some loser team save him, we're not in the business of reviving ex Celtics careers. It's a reason the T-Wolves involved him in that trade.
O really? Seemed to work out just fine when we picked up ex Celtics like Rick Fox and Brian Shaw.
The man has NEVER shot over 50% in his career and he plays in the front court, he's put up numbers on bad teams, hasn't grabbed 500 rebounds in a season yet, and plays like a guard instead of a 6'7" 250 lb forward. A quarter of his shot attempts come from the 3pt line instead of in the interior.
If we're going to think about getting another forward it's needs to be an interior guy. We don't need another guy built like Ron launching from 3......Ron is enough.
They were much better players? Really since when? Gomes plays solid D, can score, play SF or PF, he's average at SF as a rebounder, that's all there is to it. He's a good player, who gives a **** if the talented Blazers bench doesn't need him. The Laker bench is garbage that logic is miserable.
Goo-goo gaga? Ya goo-goo gaga for a player that's better than everyone other than Odom on the bench....
— Mags