vincecarter4pres wrote:If Gay just got max I think Lee will as well.
Yes...but as a 6 year player his max is around 14mil not 16.8 starting....and there will be NO S&t between the Nets and the Knicks so its a 5 year not a 6.
Boozer or Lee
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
Re: Boozer or Lee
-
enetric
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,484
- And1: 169
- Joined: May 24, 2001
Re: Boozer or Lee
Yes...but as a 6 year player his max is around 14mil not 16.8 starting....and there will be NO S&t between the Nets and the Knicks so its a 5 year not a 6.
Re: Boozer or Lee
-
enetric
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,484
- And1: 169
- Joined: May 24, 2001
Re: Boozer or Lee
deviljets7 wrote:Lee is younger, more versatile (while a defensive liability, he has a lot of experience at center, which is key with Favors here) and doesn't have an injury history.
Lee, Boozer and Amare are ALL defensive liabilities to one extent or the other...so for me...I just threw that out. its a big drop off from Bosh when you factor in their overall games.
Re: Boozer or Lee
-
bronxmainevent
- Ballboy
- Posts: 37
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2003
- Contact:
Re: Boozer or Lee
If I had to choose david Lee, just the fact we would take him from the knicks is a bonus and boozer has an injury history, lee does not need the ball to be productive