Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

Who will be the better player?

Anthony Randolph
188
46%
Michael Beasley
217
54%
 
Total votes: 405

BROWN
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 74
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: RealCity - MTL

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1081 » by BROWN » Fri Jul 9, 2010 5:15 am

Randolph wins by a landslide.
Randolph for an All Star to NYK, playing alongside Stoudemire, Gallo.
Beasley for a 2nd round pick to MIN, playing behind Love, Jefferson.
User avatar
NYK 455
General Manager
Posts: 7,994
And1: 163
Joined: Sep 13, 2009
Location: New York

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1082 » by NYK 455 » Fri Jul 9, 2010 5:28 am

A little off topic, but I think Lee and Biedrins is a very good frontcourt.
User avatar
Quackenboss
Rookie
Posts: 1,160
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 13, 2006
     

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1083 » by Quackenboss » Fri Jul 9, 2010 6:44 pm

How is AR not crushing Beasley now with the Knicks fans on his side? Must not have found this one yet.

Welcome aboard, Knicks fans.
User avatar
oaktownwarriors87
RealGM
Posts: 13,855
And1: 4,418
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1084 » by oaktownwarriors87 » Fri Jul 9, 2010 7:08 pm

Randolph isn't the next big thing but I still believe he's better than Beasley


AK47/Tyson Chandler >>>>> poor mans Al Harrington/Carlos Boozer
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
User avatar
Hemispheres
Veteran
Posts: 2,917
And1: 981
Joined: Dec 17, 2008
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1085 » by Hemispheres » Fri Jul 9, 2010 8:08 pm

So do the Knicks fans and TWolves fans inherit this thread from the Heat and Warriors now?

Let's add Gallo and Rubio to create more drama.
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1086 » by BrooklynBulls » Fri Jul 9, 2010 8:34 pm

This is amazing. BOTH of these guys were moved. NEAR SIMULTANEOUSLY. How often does that happen?
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1087 » by Wade2k6 » Fri Jul 9, 2010 10:19 pm

BROWN wrote:Randolph wins by a landslide.
Randolph for an All Star to NYK, playing alongside Stoudemire, Gallo.
Beasley for a 2nd round pick to MIN, playing behind Love, Jefferson.

Uhh, you don't think trading Beasley for a 2nd rounder (thus not taking back any salary) didn't have ANYTHING to do with the Heats plan on getting LeBron? :roll:
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1088 » by loserX » Fri Jul 9, 2010 10:37 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:
BROWN wrote:Randolph wins by a landslide.
Randolph for an All Star to NYK, playing alongside Stoudemire, Gallo.
Beasley for a 2nd round pick to MIN, playing behind Love, Jefferson.

Uhh, you don't think trading Beasley for a 2nd rounder (thus not taking back any salary) didn't have ANYTHING to do with the Heats plan on getting LeBron? :roll:


To be fair, they used the money they got from clearing Beasley to sign Mike Miller, not LeBron. It was pretty clear that LeBron was signing there whether Beasley was on the team or not, and also clear that they didn't just offer the newly available to cash to one of the big 3. They essentially swapped Beasley for Miller.
Chosen01
RealGM
Posts: 17,107
And1: 534
Joined: May 08, 2009
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1089 » by Chosen01 » Fri Jul 9, 2010 10:59 pm

exactly and it was

Randolph and Turiaf for Lee.. so lol

PLUS

it was Beasley for 2nd rnder and future first round swap, so it could potentially be the #1 pick, because we all know T-wolves will suck for at least anotehr 3-4 years.Also i think anybody would take miller over Beasley to compliment Wade,LeBron Bosh.
510TWSS
General Manager
Posts: 8,960
And1: 2,992
Joined: Aug 18, 2009
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1090 » by 510TWSS » Fri Jul 9, 2010 11:15 pm

BrooklynBulls wrote:This is amazing. BOTH of these guys were moved. NEAR SIMULTANEOUSLY. How often does that happen?


Seems very fitting though.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,185
And1: 9,933
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1091 » by Blame Rasho » Fri Jul 9, 2010 11:56 pm

People talk about earth shattering breaking news all the time, but when these two players got traded, the our universe was pulsing from the effects.
User avatar
Storm Surge
General Manager
Posts: 9,024
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1092 » by Storm Surge » Tue Oct 5, 2010 5:12 pm

I think both of these guys will play better this season, I expect this thread to get bumped often.
Rockice_8
Banned User
Posts: 1,673
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1093 » by Rockice_8 » Tue Oct 5, 2010 5:24 pm

wiff wrote:I'll take the guy who isn't going to need meds to function in everyday life.


Yeah Instead go for the guy that cries on the bench when he's yelled at. It's a toss up but slight edge to Beasley who I think was held back a bit with Wade taking over all the time.
Rockice_8
Banned User
Posts: 1,673
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1094 » by Rockice_8 » Tue Oct 5, 2010 5:28 pm

loserX wrote:
Wade2k6 wrote:
BROWN wrote:Randolph wins by a landslide.
Randolph for an All Star to NYK, playing alongside Stoudemire, Gallo.
Beasley for a 2nd round pick to MIN, playing behind Love, Jefferson.

Uhh, you don't think trading Beasley for a 2nd rounder (thus not taking back any salary) didn't have ANYTHING to do with the Heats plan on getting LeBron? :roll:


To be fair, they used the money they got from clearing Beasley to sign Mike Miller, not LeBron. It was pretty clear that LeBron was signing there whether Beasley was on the team or not, and also clear that they didn't just offer the newly available to cash to one of the big 3. They essentially swapped Beasley for Miller.


Thats not a knock on Beasley really, Miller is clearly the better fit with his ability to stretch to floor. They would have swapped AR for Miller too.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1095 » by SportsWorld » Tue Oct 5, 2010 5:30 pm

I fully expect Michael Beasley to be suspended at some point in this season for drugs or driving under the influence.
Chosen01
RealGM
Posts: 17,107
And1: 534
Joined: May 08, 2009
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1096 » by Chosen01 » Tue Oct 5, 2010 5:41 pm

Pre-Season game 1

Beasley 21 4 rbs 3stls 80% 18mins

AR 16pts 4rbs 63% 1ast 19mins
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1097 » by FNQ » Thu Oct 7, 2010 2:33 am

FWIW, I still take Baby Jesus... just too much potential. And I dont see it with Beasley, who I just cant see being effectively defensively. Too slow for SF, too weak for PF.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1098 » by Jimmy76 » Thu Oct 7, 2010 3:13 am

well both have been major disappointments up to now :-?
HoopsGuru25
General Manager
Posts: 9,321
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 18, 2006

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1099 » by HoopsGuru25 » Thu Oct 7, 2010 3:21 am

Jimmy76 wrote:well both have been major disappointments up to now :-?

Randolph isn't really a major disappointment though. RealGM homers aside-you aren't likely to get anything more than a role player with the 14th pick.
TAI8
Banned User
Posts: 7,205
And1: 5
Joined: May 14, 2005

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#1100 » by TAI8 » Thu Oct 7, 2010 3:47 am

HoopsGuru25 wrote:
Jimmy76 wrote:well both have been major disappointments up to now :-?

Randolph isn't really a major disappointment though. RealGM homers aside-you aren't likely to get anything more than a role player with the 14th pick.


That's nonsense. There have been plenty of good players that have been picked with the 14th pick and beyond. Ever hear of Danny Granger, Al Jefferson, Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili, David West, Josh Howard, Zach Randolph, etc? Draft selection means nothing. If you can play you can play and Randolph has shown he can play. His potential is sky high.

Return to Player Comparisons