Image Image Image Image

Over/Under

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

User avatar
americanese
Ballboy
Posts: 11
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Over/Under 

Post#1 » by americanese » Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:22 pm

Over or Under...

1. The number of games Chicago will win next season. Lets put it at 9.5 games.
Over. Its hard to say, but assuming Mike Martz does his magic, we should win plenty.

2. How many receivers hit 1000 receiving yards? 1.5 WRs.
Over. Mike Martz, baby! :lol:

3. How many plus 100-yard rushing games will Matt Forte or Chester Taylor have? 3.5 games.
Under. Timeshare = fantasy headache :(

4. How many times will Jay Cutler be sacked this season? Last season he was sacked 35 times. We'll put it at 25 sacks.
Over. We never really upgraded our O-line...


Your turn! What do you all think?
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

Re: Over/Under 

Post#2 » by emperorjones » Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:19 pm

Still early - I'd like to get through camp but what the heck....


1. The number of games Chicago will win next season. Lets put it at 9.5 games.
Over. Its always 11 wins for me this time of year. How can't they win 11? :lol:

2. How many receivers hit 1000 receiving yards? 1.5 WRs.
Under. I'm thinking more that we will have a number of WRs over 700 yards but not more than 1 at 1000 if any.

3. How many plus 100-yard rushing games will Matt Forte or Chester Taylor have? 3.5 games.
Under.


4. How many times will Jay Cutler be sacked this season? Last season he was sacked 35 times. We'll put it at 25 sacks.
Under. The line is upgraded by the lack of Orlando Pace and stability brought by people not playing out of position.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Over/Under 

Post#3 » by WEFFPIM » Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:18 am

1. Under. I'll say this, this team can go in either direction. This is quite an experiment being thrown onto the field this year and it will either mesh well or fail miserably. Since I'm a pessimist I go for the latter.

2. Under. I'll go one.

3. Under. Not in a Mike Martz offense. They will have a good amount of receiving yards, though.

4. Under. Please be under.

Return to Chicago Bears