DCZards wrote:With his huge ego, narcissim and King-like attitude LeBron is an easy and understandable target for posters' hate.
That's the spirit!
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
DCZards wrote:With his huge ego, narcissim and King-like attitude LeBron is an easy and understandable target for posters' hate.
DCZards wrote:
I thought everything was open to debate on a board like this. In fact, I find it kind of boring when everyone is "singing from the same songbook." Don't you?
Illuminaire wrote:DCZards wrote:Here's another perspective on the LeBron, ESPN stuff. They're excerpts from an article on the website "The Root."Blah Blah Blah
That's not how I saw it. A self-absorbed egomaniac wouldn't leave $30 million on the table; he'd grab every cent possible. He wouldn't leave to play on another superstar's team, with the likelihood of diminished stats and stature in return. And he certainly wouldn't give up the undying love and affection of his hometown, where fans burned his jersey in the aftermath.
Blah blah blah
This is the point where the article loses all credibility to me. The author clearly does not understand human psychology; being self-absorbed does not mean you value money. Personal security and wealth that lets you fulfill your desires and whims? Sure. But Lebron was getting that either way. Being completely self-absorbed does not mean you value family, friends, or fans; it means you do what seems like the best thing for you at any given time, and damn the consequences to others.
The ego component to Lebron is the most debatable, and the only idea I found in that article worth much of anything. If I was building a psychological profile of James I would probably conclude that he is much, much more insecure than he seems outwardly. The exterior displays of ego are contradicted by his actions - he calls himself the King, but frequently shrinks from the moment, evades responsibility, and lays the blame for failure on others.
I feel bad for Lebron, honestly. He puffs himself up so we won't see how terribly afraid he really is.
DCZards wrote:
And I'm not trying to defend LBJ....just trying to provide a different perspective...kinda like Jesse Jackson did.
The Miami Heat announced today that guard Mario Chalmers has suffered a high left ankle sprain. He is expected to be in a cast for two to four weeks and will be re-evaluated following that time.
Wizards2Lottery wrote:
Jesse Jackson embarrasses himself and minorities whenever he opens his mouth. Sometimes different perspectives are better left unsaid.
The Heat, of course, is on a lot of [ring chasers] lists, including that of former Heat guard Mike James, who played Wednesday in Wade's charity golf event at Doral.
"Because of my matureness of the game and my wisdom of the game, I would be able to fit any situation, especially a situation like here in Miami," James said.
Benjammin wrote:I like Hoopalotta's (I think it's his) moniker, Le bon bon.
"Because of my matureness of the game and my wisdom of the game, I would be able to fit any situation, especially a situation like here in Miami," James said.
Wizards2Lottery wrote:"Because of my matureness of the game and my wisdom of the game, I would be able to fit any situation, especially a situation like here in Miami," James said.
He had to have that sarcastically.
keynote wrote:^ I think that was a typo. The correct spelling is "manureness."
verbal8 wrote:Wizards2Lottery wrote:"Because of my matureness of the game and my wisdom of the game, I would be able to fit any situation, especially a situation like here in Miami," James said.
He had to have that sarcastically.
Is this even a word? Shouldn't it be maturity.
By fitting in any situation, does he mean that he can sit at the end of the bench for any NBA team.
Illuminaire wrote:...he calls himself the King, but frequently shrinks from the moment, evades responsibility, and lays the blame for failure on others.
Bryant Gumbel wrote:Finally tonight, a few words about championship rings. Just when did they become the all-important barometer of who does or doesn't count in sports? When did they supersede personal excellence or exemplary character as a standard of greatness?
I got to thinking about that the other night after the self-anointed chosen one, LeBron James, embarrassed himself as he tried to make his decision to seek rings in Miami sound like a search for the Holy Grail. It's when he essentially admitted to placing a higher priority on winning than anything else.
LeBron's decision is typical of our immediate gratification era, but it flies in the face of history. Even though he never won a title, Dan Marino is still the biggest hero in Florida. And in Boston, all those Celtics championships are dimmed by the unforgettable brilliance of Ted Williams, who never won anything. In Chicago, Gale Sayers and Dick Butkus have legendary status despite playing on losing teams. And even in the NBA, where guys seem obsessed with being viewed as "the man," real men like Barkley, Ewing and Baylor are ringless, but revered.
Despite such evidence to the contrary, LeBron James seems to think he needs a ring to change his life and secure his legacy. Maybe he'll get one, maybe he won't, but it's probable that no amount of rings will ever remove the stench he wallowed in last week. LeBron may yet find that in the court of public opinion, just as putting on a tux can’t make a guy a gentleman, winning a ring can’t make one truly a champion.