ImageImageImageImageImage

Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#1 » by dockingsched » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:04 pm

probably no surprise, but Kupchak said he expects Fish to still be the starter.


http://twitter.com/LakersReporter

Kupchak said he anticipates that Derek Fisher will remain the starter, adding that there are "a lot of minutes" for Blake


http://twitter.com/KevinDing

Kupchack reiterated Fish is expected to start. Blake said he admires Fish: "I've always looked up to him. He's a winner."
User avatar
Edrees
RealGM
Posts: 17,225
And1: 12,434
Joined: May 12, 2009
Contact:
         

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#2 » by Edrees » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:28 pm

What about Kobe? Is he starter too?
User avatar
96 Til Infiniti
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,831
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 18, 2009

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#3 » by 96 Til Infiniti » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:34 pm

Blake will get his PT and opportunities, he just needs to stay ready. I expect him to become a leader for the bench this season along with LO.
Thank you, Phil.
semi-sentient
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,149
And1: 5,624
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: Austin, Tejas
 

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#4 » by semi-sentient » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:37 pm

As long as Blake gets at least 25 MPG I don't give a rats ass who starts. In fact, I'd prefer that he get about 28 minutes and Fisher about 20. About the only thing that could possibly make our bench worse is if Fisher were leading the charge, so it's probably best that we hide his lack of on-court production by putting him with the starting unit.
"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere." - Carl Sagan
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#5 » by The Skyhook » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:42 pm

As expected.
joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#6 » by joe.linnen » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:48 pm

96 Til Infiniti wrote:Blake will get his PT and opportunities, he just needs to stay ready. I expect him to become a leader for the bench this season along with LO.



I want us to add something else to that bench. Odom and Blake is a nice start, I love Walton too, but I want something more. I'll take Kurt Thomas and another wing to back up Bryant.


LA Bench
SF:Walton
PF:Odom
C:Thomas
SG:???? PLEASE DEAR GOD SEND US TRACY MCGRADY
PG:Blake
User avatar
supaflash
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,670
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Location: A Mile High
Contact:
   

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#7 » by supaflash » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:53 pm

Fish fits well with the starters, I expect him to start to go into a more Finley role in SA.

Fish starts for 5 mins, Blake comes in for 13 min stretch or so, Fish finishes half. Plays few mins to start second half, Blake plays mid 3rd to mid 4th, Fish finishes...

I think we will get a healthy dose of Blake, i don't think Phil will pull him quick like Farmar becasue he's so much better at staying under control and managing the game.
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#8 » by That Nicka » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:54 pm

Edrees wrote:What about Kobe? Is he starter too?
brandonkb8
Junior
Posts: 340
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Contact:

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#9 » by brandonkb8 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:27 pm

As long as Blake gets at least 25 MPG I don't give a rats ass who starts. In fact, I'd prefer that he get about 28 minutes and Fisher about 20. About the only thing that could possibly make our bench worse is if Fisher were leading the charge, so it's probably best that we hide his lack of on-court production by putting him with the starting unit.


Where does all this hatred for Derek come from? Geezuz wheres the loyalty.
semi-sentient
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,149
And1: 5,624
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: Austin, Tejas
 

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#10 » by semi-sentient » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:01 pm

brandonkb8 wrote:
As long as Blake gets at least 25 MPG I don't give a rats ass who starts. In fact, I'd prefer that he get about 28 minutes and Fisher about 20. About the only thing that could possibly make our bench worse is if Fisher were leading the charge, so it's probably best that we hide his lack of on-court production by putting him with the starting unit.


Where does all this hatred for Derek come from? Geezuz wheres the loyalty.


Hatred?

What do we need to do? Suck his dick?

Look, I'm glad he's back. We all are. He's a valuable locker room presence and he's a guy that comes through for us in pressure situations, BUT, he's still one of the worst starting PG's in the league. His defense, outside shooting, and decision-making all suck at this stage of his career, so I don't see why in the world it's a bad thing that Blake get the bulk of the minutes.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,556
And1: 25,528
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#11 » by hermes » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:15 pm

joe.linnen wrote:I want us to add something else to that bench. Odom and Blake is a nice start, I love Walton too, but I want something more. I'll take Kurt Thomas and another wing to back up Bryant.


LA Bench
SF:Walton
PF:Odom
C:Thomas
SG:I have the utmost confidence in Sasha Vujacic being a solid player
PG:Blake

fixed :wink:
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 50,968
And1: 45,162
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#12 » by Sedale Threatt » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:35 pm

semi-sentient wrote:As long as Blake gets at least 25 MPG I don't give a rats ass who starts. In fact, I'd prefer that he get about 28 minutes and Fisher about 20. About the only thing that could possibly make our bench worse is if Fisher were leading the charge, so it's probably best that we hide his lack of on-court production by putting him with the starting unit.


That's probably exactly how it will break down. Play the first six minutes, 1Q; last four minutes, 2Q; repeat in the second half with necessary adjustments.
brandonkb8
Junior
Posts: 340
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Contact:

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#13 » by brandonkb8 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:03 pm

As long as Blake gets at least 25 MPG I don't give a rats ass who starts. In fact, I'd prefer that he get about 28 minutes and Fisher about 20. About the only thing that could possibly make our bench worse is if Fisher were leading the charge, so it's probably best that we hide his lack of on-court production by putting him with the starting unit.

brandonkb8: Where does all this hatred for Derek come from? Geezuz wheres the loyalty.


Hatred?

What do we need to do? Suck his dick?

Look, I'm glad he's back. We all are. He's a valuable locker room presence and he's a guy that comes through for us in pressure situations, BUT, he's still one of the worst starting PG's in the league. His defense, outside shooting, and decision-making all suck at this stage of his career, so I don't see why in the world it's a bad thing that Blake get the bulk of the minutes.



Wow why dont you take it down a notch buddy. And who is "we"? and yes, obvious hatred. And no one ever said it would be a bad thing if Blake gets the majority of the minutes. I just wanted to point out your hateful opinion on Fisher, judging by your posts its obvious.
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 50,968
And1: 45,162
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#14 » by Sedale Threatt » Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:41 pm

It's not hatred to point out he was one of the worst starting point guards in the league last year, if not the worst. That's pretty much fact.
User avatar
supaflash
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,670
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Location: A Mile High
Contact:
   

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#15 » by supaflash » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:11 pm

I still maintain the stance that if he were better we wouldn't need his clutch shots...
brandonkb8
Junior
Posts: 340
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Contact:

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#16 » by brandonkb8 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:14 pm

It's not hatred to point out he was one of the worst starting point guards in the league last year, if not the worst. That's pretty much fact.


Slurp Slurp
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#17 » by DEEP3CL » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:25 pm

No reason to replace what's not broken. People here are misguided on Fish, he can still play but in limited stretches. Our problem was not having an adequate back up, bottom line Jordan sucked. His unwillingness to conform to the Triangle was his ticket out of LA. Blake will fill the role 100% better and he won't complain or pout. Case close.
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#18 » by That Nicka » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:37 pm

Fisher is one of the worst starting PGs but I think Blake can be one of the best backup PGs so we will end up being fine in that department (better than we've been in recent years)
ChampagnePapa
Sophomore
Posts: 130
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 24, 2010

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#19 » by ChampagnePapa » Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:11 am

I still don't understand why people rip on Fisher. That's like saying Shaq is not what he used to be. Obvious people. The guy is smart on the floor, rarely takes an ill advised shot, willing to make the pass and accept his role as a facilitator and ball mover with a few scoring opps sprinkled in. His D has been largely overblown. He draws charges with the best of them. With that alone he is forcing plenty of turnovers. "he can't guard fast PGs"...really? Because everyone else in the league is just shutting down Deron, Paul, Westbrook and Rondo, right? That's like calling Kobe finished because Durant got the best of him at the end of game situation vs. OKC. A mismatch is exactly that, a mismatch, it doesnt always mean the player is trash.

I am not saying the guy is an All Star, but when options 1-4 read Kobe, Pau, Bynum, Artest, the man is not going to put up numbers. So all these posts I keep reading talk about "he's a great presence and does the little things but doesnt do much on the court" is really being look at the wrong way, there's a reason why the guy is not putting up crazy numbers and I don't think anyone expected him to when the Lakers signed him. At 3 million + a year in this NBA market...I'll take it. When the position is expected to get about 4-5 shots a game, its not a big deal who is in that spot, but I am sure glad it will be Derek Fisher and not some Smush Parker experiment.,
xkirruax
Banned User
Posts: 950
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 05, 2010

Re: Kupchak: Fisher will remain starter 

Post#20 » by xkirruax » Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:50 am

ChampagnePapa wrote:I still don't understand why people rip on Fisher. That's like saying Shaq is not what he used to be. Obvious people. The guy is smart on the floor, rarely takes an ill advised shot, willing to make the pass and accept his role as a facilitator and ball mover with a few scoring opps sprinkled in. His D has been largely overblown. He draws charges with the best of them. With that alone he is forcing plenty of turnovers. "he can't guard fast PGs"...really? Because everyone else in the league is just shutting down Deron, Paul, Westbrook and Rondo, right? That's like calling Kobe finished because Durant got the best of him at the end of game situation vs. OKC. A mismatch is exactly that, a mismatch, it doesnt always mean the player is trash.

I am not saying the guy is an All Star, but when options 1-4 read Kobe, Pau, Bynum, Artest, the man is not going to put up numbers. So all these posts I keep reading talk about "he's a great presence and does the little things but doesnt do much on the court" is really being look at the wrong way, there's a reason why the guy is not putting up crazy numbers and I don't think anyone expected him to when the Lakers signed him. At 3 million + a year in this NBA market...I'll take it. When the position is expected to get about 4-5 shots a game, its not a big deal who is in that spot, but I am sure glad it will be Derek Fisher and not some Smush Parker experiment.,

Lol this is going to be so much fun killing this Fisher fan so many stuff he said that is way wrong

If by rare take ill advised shot you mean he dosnt do break away 3- 1 pull up 3pt bricks then right oo wait he dose atleast twice a game.

If by willing to make the pass means only pass it to kobe right after he passes the 1/2 court and shots anything else that comes close to him seeing how he shot the 7th most shot last years for the lakers.

Lol what you was saying would be true if aposing PG didnt adv Magic type numbers vs the Lakers so no he "D" is not ever stated

Your right a Mismatch is a mismatch yet every pg in the league has a field day vs fisher.

So your saying cuz our other 4 are so great its ok to have a scrub how dose that make any sence at all. Shouldnt you be trying 2 have the 5 best on at all times?

what your saying he is expected to take 3 - 4 shots a yet he took 7.5 ontop of that this is how bad fisher is he shot the 7th most shots per game while having the 10%th ranked FG% on the team

the guy beat out Morrison by .003% from the FG% last year you know how pathetic that is?

Return to Los Angeles Lakers